Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for نهالنامه

Channel

نهالنامه

@nahalname

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

459subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 27 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001879560851
TypeChannel
Username@nahalname
Description🌱این کانال برای توئه که هنوز به بلند شدن بعد از افتادن باور داری؛ با نوشته‌هایی برای دل، کتاب‌هایی برای ذهن، و امیدی برای ادامه دادن.🌱 کانال کتاب های صوتی انگلیسی: 🎧 @booknahal
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded27 September 2026
Last confirmed live27 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/nahalname

Growth

45927 Sept 2026, 06:48 — 459 subscribers27 Sept 2026, 07:22 — 459 subscribers27 Sept 2026, 06:4827 Sept 2026, 07:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 458–460 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Sept 2026, 07:22459no change
27 Sept 2026, 06:48459first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
51.2%
avg views ÷ 459 subscribers
Avg views / post
235
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held18 (1 August 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total2,350
Reactions total186
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 07:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
472
Videos
245
Links
77

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
27s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

365 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤20155.1%
💔4712.9%
👍369.86%
😍195.21%
🕊154.11%
😭123.29%
🤬123.29%
🍓113.01%
👏71.92%
🥰30.822%
⚡20.548%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 365 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Sept 2026, 16:28 UTC73 views8 reactionsread 27 September 2026
File

پلنر ماهانه و ساعتی ماه اکتبر تقدیم با عشق 🌺 روزهای جمعه داخل پلنر ساعتی لحاظ نشدن اگه جمعه ها کار کردین به روزای قبلی اضافه کنین🌱 دوتا گربه کدو به سر خنگولم براتون اضافه کردم😂 @nahalname 🌱

❤7😍1

18 Sept 2026, 15:00 UTC176 views18 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @Bayanz

در بچگی هرگاه معنی لغت انگلیسی‌ای را از پدرم می‌پرسیدم، به دیکشنری قطوری که توی کتاب‌خانه‌اش داشت اشاره می‌کرد. می‌گفت «اگه من فوری بهت جواب بدم دو دقیقه بعد یادت می‌ره، ولی اگه خودت بری معنی‌شو دربیاری یادت می‌مونه، چارتا چیز اضافه هم یاد می‌گیری». من از این رویکردش کلافه می‌شدم ولی نیت خیرخواهانه‌اش را درک می‌کردم. اولین‌بار که دیکشنری قطور آکسفورد را آوردم، بهم یاد داد چطور به ترتیب الفبا یک کلمه را در آن پیدا …

❤13👏5

17 Sept 2026, 11:02 UTC299 views31 reactionsread 27 September 2026

بچه‌ ها، من از دی‌ ماه تا الان مطلقا توی کانال نهالبوک کتاب نذاشتم. خودم اما تقریبا همیشه یه کتاب دستم بوده، فقط این مدت معرفیشون نکردم. میخواستم ببینم هنوز دوست دارین معرفی کتابام رو ادامه بدم و دوباره بذارمشون توی کانال؟ راستش نمیدونم حال و هوای شما این روزا چطوره. بعضیاتون میگین دیگه انگیزه‌ کتاب خوندن ندارین یا حوصلش رو ندارین. ولی برای من، کتاب خوندن همیشه یکی از بهترین راها برای فرار از واقعیت بوده. نه از اون…

👍31

14 Sept 2026, 11:37 UTC207 views25 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

نگرانِ آمدنِ خزان باشم؟ مگر در باغ ما گلی مانده؟؟ لاله‌های وطنم را سرمای زمستان باخودش برد🕊🖤 @nahalname 🌱

💔20😭3❤2

7 Sept 2026, 16:10 UTC296 views11 reactionsread 27 September 2026

چقد جادوهاتون قشنگه 🥹🥹🥹 چقد قشنگین همتون آخه 🥹🥹😍😍😍

❤11

7 Sept 2026, 13:59 UTC288 views18 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

من عزیزم، میدونم خسته‌ ای. لازم نیست همیشه قوی باشی. فقط قول بده این روزهای سخت رو به آخر خط تعبیر نکنی. یه روز به عقب نگاه میکنی و میفهمی همین روزهایی که فکر میکردی دارن شکستت میدن، داشتن ازت آدم قویتری میساختن. پس فعلا فقط ادامه بده. آروم، خسته، با ترس… ولی ادامه بده. باشه؟ پ. ن: اینو از chatgpt بپرسین ببینین چی جوابتون رو میده به منم بگین چی گفت 🥺 #نهالنوشت @nahalname 🌱

❤16🍓2

6 Sept 2026, 21:55 UTC265 views21 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

‌ چند ستاره‌ی دیگر باید افول کند،‌ تا این صبح بدمد؟! @nahalname 🌱💔

💔14😭7

4 Sept 2026, 05:04 UTC293 views29 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

یهو به خودت میای و میبینی عدد سنت بیشتر از چیزیه که توی ذهنت برای خودت تصور کرده بودی. بعد شروع میکنی به مقایسه کردن. با هم‌ سن‌ و سالات، با آدمایی که زودتر رسیدن، با اون نسخه‌ ای از خودت که قرار بود تا الان خیلی چیزها رو داشته باشه،خیلی جاها رفته باشه.... من اصلا حسود نیستم. ولی بعضی وقتا این حس میاد سراغم که «خب... پس چرا من نه؟» ولی بعد یادم میفته زندگی مسابقه‌ نیست که یه خط پایان مشخص داشته باشه. خیلی اتفاقایی…

❤28🍓1

3 Sept 2026, 12:53 UTC223 views10 reactionsread 27 September 2026
File

آهنگ کلیپ قبلی @nahalname 🌱

❤10

3 Sept 2026, 12:51 UTC230 views15 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

ما بهش ميگيم نشخوار فکری خارجیا میگن: overthink ولى عبد الوهاب الرفاعی میگه: در سرم جنگ های زیادی است که تنها کشته اش منم... @nahalname 🌱

💔13❤1🍓1

28 Aug 2026, 10:24 UTC302 views18 reactionsread 27 September 2026
File

پلنر ماهانه و ساعتی ماه سپتامبر تقدیم با عشق 🌺 روزهای جمعه داخل پلنر ساعتی لحاظ نشدن اگه جمعه ها کار کردین به روزای قبلی اضافه کنین🌱 @nahalname 🌱

❤15🍓3

19 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC419 views24 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

فکر کنم دلیل اینکه انقدر کتابای قدیمی رو دوست دارم، فقط خود کتاب نیست. همیشه وقتی یه کتاب مثلا ۵۰ ساله دستم میگیرم، با خودم فکر میکنم اولین بار کی خریدتش؟اون روز چند سالش بوده؟ با چه شوقی از کتاب‌ فروشی آوردش خونه؟کجاها خوندش؟ توی چه خونه‌ ای؟ کنار چه آدمایی؟ لابه‌ لای همین صفحه ها چه اتفاقایی برای صاحبش افتاده؟چند نفر بعد از اون دستشون به این کتاب خورده؟اون آدما الان کجان؟ هنوز زنده هستن؟ چرا کتاب بالاخره از زندگیشو…

❤19🥰3🍓2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @nahalname. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“نهالنامه” (@nahalname), 459 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nahalname.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.