Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for بَیان

Channel

بَیان

@Bayanz

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,849subscribers

+391 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001096710274
TypeChannel
Username@Bayanz
Descriptionمی‌خوانم. می‌نویسم. ایکس (توییتر سابق): https://x.com/farzad_bayan اینستاگرام: https://instagram.com/farzad.bayan
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Bayanz

Topic

Job listings — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,4508,8498,649.56 August 2026 — 8,458 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,458 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,457 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,455 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,450 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,454 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,476 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,483 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,484 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,491 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,500 subscribers4 September 2026 — 8,502 subscribers9 September 2026 — 8,504 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,502 subscribers17 September 2026 — 8,510 subscribers25 September 2026 — 8,578 subscribers4 October 2026 — 8,622 subscribers10 October 2026 — 8,666 subscribers14 October 2026 — 8,676 subscribers17 October 2026 — 8,669 subscribers20 October 2026 — 8,674 subscribers23 October 2026 — 8,685 subscribers26 October 2026 — 8,691 subscribers1 November 2026 — 8,792 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,832 subscribers7 November 2026 — 8,831 subscribers11 November 2026 — 8,849 subscribers6 August 202611 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 98 days, net +391. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,390–8,909 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 13:208,849+18
7 Nov 2026, 10:568,831-1
4 Nov 2026, 01:088,832+40
1 Nov 2026, 06:188,792+101
26 Oct 2026, 09:468,691+6
23 Oct 2026, 02:008,685+11
20 Oct 2026, 02:478,674+5
17 Oct 2026, 02:288,669-7
14 Oct 2026, 12:468,676+10
10 Oct 2026, 17:188,666+44
4 Oct 2026, 20:398,622+44
25 Sept 2026, 08:168,578+68
17 Sept 2026, 04:598,510+8
13 Sept 2026, 07:168,502-2
9 Sept 2026, 19:208,504+2
4 Sept 2026, 19:198,502+2
31 Aug 2026, 23:598,500+9
28 Aug 2026, 18:528,491+7
25 Aug 2026, 13:388,484+1
22 Aug 2026, 14:278,483first reading

Engagement

39 posts held, back to 12 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
75.5%
avg views ÷ 8,849 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,680
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 39 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held39 (12 February 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total53,424
Reactions total2,981
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 00:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
176
Videos
104
Links
222

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
42s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

11,628 reactions across 39 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤11,628100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,628 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 12 February 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (50.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 22:20 UTC694 views39 reactionsread 13 November 2026

جامعه‌شناس آلمانی، فیلیپ اشتاین‌من روی «پارادوکس ادغام» مهاجرها پژوهش کرده. این پارادوکس از این قرار است: مهاجرهایی که تحصیلات بالاتری دارند، بیشتر از مهاجرهای کم‌سوادتر احساس می‌کنند که به خاطر قومیت و ملیت‌شان مورد تبعیض قرار می‌گیرند. در توضیح این پارادوکس دلایلی از جمله آگاهی بیشتر، حضور بیشتر در جامعه، انتظارات بالاتر خود فرد و... در افراد تحصیل‌کرده ذکر شده است. البته دلایل برای مهاجرهای ترک و لهستانی متفاو…

❤39

10 Nov 2026, 09:07 UTC≈3,070 views336 reactionsread 13 November 2026

مصاحبه‌ای با مدیرعامل Shopify گوش می‌دادم، به نکته‌ی خوبی اشاره کرد. گفت این روزها برخلاف گذشته، خروجی کاری زیاد و طولانی نشانه‌ی تنبلی است. ایمیل‌های بلند و گزارش‌های طولانی. متون درازی که مشخص است طرف خودش حتی یک دور هم نخوانده. هوش مصنوعی تمایل آزاردهنده‌ای به حرافی دارد. برخلاف دورانی که «مفصل» بودن نشانی از پرکار بودن به‌حساب می‌آمد، این روزها اختصار نشانه‌ی وقت گذاشتن است. @bayanz

❤336

1 Nov 2026, 12:35 UTC≈5,730 views357 reactionsread 13 November 2026

اینا با این که خیابون دست کسی جز خودشون باشه مشکل دارن. بقیه حرفاشون بهونه‌ست.

❤357

31 Oct 2026, 15:45 UTC≈5,950 views332 reactionsread 13 November 2026

حالا کاری هم نداریم که خود هالووین اساساً بیش از ۲۰۰۰ سال پیش از انگلستان و ایرلند آغاز شد و به کشورهای دیگه‌ی دنیا رسید و امروزه در آمریکا حتی از خود انگلیس هم جدی‌تر گرفته می‌شه، به همین جهت خیلی‌ها فکر می‌کنند یک فرهنگ آمریکاییه - که البته اشتباه هم فکر نمی‌کنند. ریشه‌اش آمریکایی نیست، اما بعد از ۲ هزار سال یک فرهنگ آمریکایی «هم» محسوب می‌شه. کما این که فرهنگ انگلیسی و جزوی از فرهنگ خیلی کشورهای دیگه هم هست. فرهنگ…

❤332

31 Oct 2026, 14:08 UTC≈11,300 views600 reactionsread 13 November 2026

یکی نوشته چرا هزینه گریم هالوین رو نمی‌دین برای بچه‌های سیستان بلوچستان کفش بخرید؟ یکی دیگه گفته چرا برای هالووین حوصله دارین، ولی نوروز که میشه یادتون میاد این زندگی به درد نمی‌خوره؟ اینطوریه که فرهنگ می‌میره. یکی دیگه به تسمخر گفته «اسلام اشکال داره چون از اعراب اومده اما هالووین اشکالی نداره چون از کون نشورهای اروپاییِ سفید اومده» به‌طور کلی یه عده از هم‌وطنان از شادی کردن انسان ایرانی نفرت دارند. نمی‌تونن واض…

❤600

28 Oct 2026, 00:23 UTC≈7,180 views315 reactionsread 13 November 2026

تنهایی آدم را به شبکه‌های اجتماعی می‌کشاند. مشکل اینجاست که تنها چیزی که این شبکه‌ها نیستند «اجتماعی» است. تعجبی هم ندارد که استفاده از شبکه‌های اجتماعی برای رفع تنهایی آدم‌ها را تنهاتر می‌کند. آدم‌ها از هر زمانی به هم متصل‌تر و در عین حال از همیشه تنهاترند. دوری از شبکه‌های اجتماعی هم مشکل تنهایی بشر را حل نمی‌کند، بلکه برعکس صدای تنهایی را بلندتر به گوش می‌رساند. می‌توان انتخاب کرد که حواس خود را از این صدا پر…

❤315

18 Oct 2026, 17:32 UTC≈9,300 views757 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

دو تصویر بالا را ببینید. هر از چندگاهی اینستاگرام را نصب می‌کنم و یک چرخی توش می‌زنم ببینم چه خبر است و هربار به غلط کردن می‌افتم. اولین حسی که از فضا می‌گیرم عجیب، پوچ، مهمل و حتی ترسناک است، اما انگار تا وقتی توش غرق هستی حس نمی‌کنی. دوتا عکس بالا را از یک ریلز اسکرین‌شات گرفتم و تازه صورت‌ها هم محو نبود خودم خط‌خطی کردم. یکی از تعدادی رهگذر فیلم گرفته و لباسشان را با هوش مصنوعی عوض کرده‌ که بگوید «اگه آقایون ب…

❤757

16 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC≈10,200 views245 reactionsread 13 November 2026

بعد از هزاران ویدیویی که راجع‌به دزدی شکلات‌های کیت‌کت و اسباب‌بازی‌های لگو و هزاران موضوع «داغ» دیگر توسط کانال‌های به اصطلاح مستندساز در یوتوب انگلیسی ساخته شد، بالاخره یکی هم پیدا شد که به کشتار ۱۸ و ۱۹ دی در ایران بپردازد: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcr6iOOO2eM + البته به خاطر داریم که کسانی مثل جانی‌هریس قبلاً به مسئله‌ی ایران پرداخته‌اند، منتها از زاویه‌ی جمهوری‌اسلامی‌پسند ماجرا. ویدیوهایی مثل این که با…

❤245

13 Oct 2026, 07:41 UTC≈8,210 views409 reactionsread 13 November 2026

کسی نوشته: «خوشبختانه مشروب خوردن هم داره همون روند نزولی قلیون کشیدن رو طی می‌کنه. اول جاشو تو استوری ها از دست داد و بعد هم میل به خوردنش کم شد. تشکر از نسل زد که داره زندگی سالم و صحیح رو به ما دیکته می‌کنه.» این که نسل Z نسبت به نسل‌های گذشته الکل کمتری مصرف می‌کند حرف غلطی نیست و حداقل با آمارهایی که از آمریکا داریم جور درمی‌آید. اما این که کاهش مصرف الکل در نسل Z را یک خبر خوب بدانیم و آن را الزاماً نشانه‌ی «…

❤409

7 Oct 2026, 09:05 UTC≈11,600 views432 reactionsread 13 November 2026

آدم‌ها می‌گویند عاشق تنهایی‌اند، و بعد در خلوت خود حین غذا خوردن ویدیوی یوتوب یا سریال می‌بینند، در حین شستن ظرف‌ها پادکست گوش می‌کنند، و قبل خواب سوشال‌مدیا اسکرول می‌کنند. ــ بیان @bayanz

❤432

30 Sept 2026, 10:44 UTC≈10,500 views224 reactionsread 13 November 2026

قاعده‌ی شبکه‌های اجتماعی تا سال‌ها این بود که همه‌چیز واقعی است، مگر خلافش ثابت شود که فیک است. قاعده دارد معکوس می‌شود: همه‌چیز فیک است مگر این که خلافش ثابت شود که واقعی است. بسیاری از نهادهای راستی‌آزمایی هنوز هم بر اساس رویکرد «تایید منفی» (negative verification) کار می‌کنند. یعنی اگر نشانه‌ای از ساختگی بودن یک محتوا پیدا نکنند، فرض می‌گیرند که واقعی است. یعنی عدم یافتن مدرک تقلب = صحت محتوا. این قاعده دیگر …

❤224

28 Sept 2026, 22:40 UTC≈10,500 views349 reactionsread 13 November 2026

گاهی آدم حسرت می‌خورد که به خاطر فلان اشتباه، انتخاب یا ویژگی، فرصتی را در زندگی از دست داده است. باور من این است که ما فقط همان کسی که بودیم می‌توانستیم باشیم. در هر لحظه، زندگی جز آنچه بوده نمی‌توانسته باشد. پذیرش این موضوع دشوار اما رهایی‌بخش است. ـــ بیان @bayanz

❤349

Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @Bayanz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Bayanz edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @Bayanz as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
3 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 months
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Mar 2026, 10:21 UTCAnonymous Poll1,180 voters approx.

در نگاه اول، کدام‌یک از دو خبر بالا برای شما باورپذیرتر است؟

  1. خبر شماره ۱21%
  2. خبر شماره ۲64%
  3. هر دو به یک اندازه باورپذیرند15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 12 February 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ADHD FARSI | روانشناسی
@adhdbefarsi · 22,062
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 September 2026
اَميرعلى قِ
@amiralichannel · 68,073
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
Anki Decks
@AlienAnkiDecks · 19,699
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 3 October 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“بَیان” (@Bayanz), 8,849 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bayanz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.