Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for نقد کتاب وهم الحاد

Channel

نقد کتاب وهم الحاد

@naghdemolhed

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

297subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001206265488
TypeChannel
Username@naghdemolhed
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 5 July 2019— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/naghdemolhed

Growth

296297296.57 August 2026 — 296 subscribers7 August 2026 — 296 subscribers14 August 2026 — 297 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 296–297 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 09:57297+1
7 Aug 2026, 10:00296no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:01296first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 July 2019the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

19 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1052.6%
👏526.3%
👎210.5%
15.26%
🤣15.26%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2019 to 29 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jan 2026, 19:50 UTC107 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

┄┅━✵𖣐﴾﷽﴿𖣐✵━┅┄ °بِسۡــمِ‌رَبّ‌النــّور... 🔘لیـنڪ ڪلیه مطالب ڪانال جهت دسترسی آسانتر ✪ ڪلیـڪ ڪنید ⇩⇩ 🔺 مقدمه نقد کتاب توهم الحاد 🔺ناکارآمدی نظریه تکامل از نظر دانشمندان 🔺کدام علما مورد نظر همبوشی اند؟ 🔺نقد غیرعلمی نظرات دیگران در زمینه تکامل 🔺تکامل نوع به معنی تکامل انواع نیست 🔺جهل همبوشی به تکامل 🔺نظر آیت الله سیستانی 🔺نظر آیت الله کورانی 🔺جهل همبوشی در نقد دیگران 🔺نظر آیت الله شیرازی 🔺دو ادعا کاملا از روی جهل و بی

1

11 Apr 2024, 10:23 UTC747 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @PayehayePooshalyPhoto

⌛️ پایان مهلت مناظره ✅ احمد بصری گمان می‌کند برای بارداری حضرت مریم توجیهی علمی یافته 👈 اما با مراجعه به متخصصین ژنتیک می‌فهمیم که سخنان وی کاملا غیر علمی است💯 🎞 در سال 1398 هـ.ش کلیپی با همین موضوع تدوین و منتشر گردید که در ایــنــجــا می‌توانید آن را مشاهده کنید. 😇 پس از گذشت چند سال، در تاریخ 16 فروردین 1403 هـ.ش یکی از پیروان احمد بصری به دفاع از سخنان وی برآمده و گاف فراموش شده احمد را دوباره برایمان زنده می‌

👏2

8 Apr 2024, 10:18 UTC593 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @PayehayePooshalySticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

6 Apr 2024, 07:35 UTC607 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @PayehayePooshalySticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

5 Apr 2024, 08:09 UTC610 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @PayehayePooshalyPhoto

💥 مناظره / دکتر غلامی ◈ موضوع: بررسی سخنان احمد بصری پیرامون بارداری حضرت مریم 🙏 امیدواریم پیروان فرقه مدعی یمانی هر چه زودتر نماینده خویش را معرفی نمایند. ⏳ مهلت معرفی نماینده 5 روز 🔹مکان مناظره: گروه تلگرامی انصارالمهدی/موعود ✅ آی دی هماهنگی: ⚙️ https://t.me/PayehayePooshaly_bot ⛔️ لطفا از کامنت کردن سخنان بیهوده و بهانه‌های بنی اسرائیلی اجتناب شود. ▫️

👏3

21 May 2023, 13:32 UTCviews —

نقد کتاب وهم الحاد pinned «┄┅━✵𖣐﴾﷽﴿𖣐✵━┅┄ °بِسۡــمِ‌رَبّ‌النــّور... 🔘لیـنڪ ڪلیه مطالب ڪانال جهت دسترسی آسانتر ✪ ڪلیـڪ ڪنید ⇩⇩ 🔺 مقدمه نقد کتاب توهم الحاد 🔺ناکارآمدی نظریه تکامل از نظر دانشمندان 🔺کدام علما مورد نظر همبوشی اند؟ 🔺نقد غیرعلمی نظرات دیگران در زمینه تکامل 🔺تکامل نوع به…»

17 Jan 2023, 08:32 UTC≈1,190 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

┄┅═══••◆❖◆••═══┅┄ 📢 رســوایی احمد اسماعیل همبوشی در علم پزشکی 🎞 نسـخه HD ➤ سخنان اشتباه احمد همبوشی پیرامون تولد حضرت عیسی و انکار معجزه تولد ایشان 🙏 به امید بیداری هر چه زودتر عزیزان در دام افتاده 🌹🌹🌹 ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ ▓➧ @naghdemolhed ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

👍2

16 Jan 2023, 20:07 UTC≈1,590 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

┄┄┅━⊹◆◆◆⊹━┅┄┄ به نام خدا با سلام دوستان قبلا در لینک زیر فضاحت علمی بحث بارداری حضرت مریم از زبان احمد همبوشی را اثبات کردیم: https://t.me/naghdemolhed/209 🔴 و اینجا مجددا تحدی میکنم اثبات کنید دارن اسمیت دانشمند است. بماند که هیچ کلیپی هم از دارن اسمیت ندارند تنها یک صوت منتسب به ایشان است https://t.me/naghdemolhed/296 بفرمائید معجزه جهل☺️ ┄┄┅━⊹◆◆◆⊹━┅┄┄

👍1

6 Jan 2023, 09:03 UTC≈4,090 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

┄┅━✵𖣐﴾﷽﴿𖣐✵━┅┄ °بِسۡــمِ‌رَبّ‌النــّور... 🔘لیـنڪ ڪلیه مطالب ڪانال جهت دسترسی آسانتر ✪ ڪلیـڪ ڪنید ⇩⇩ 🔺 مقدمه نقد کتاب توهم الحاد 🔺ناکارآمدی نظریه تکامل از نظر دانشمندان 🔺کدام علما مورد نظر همبوشی اند؟ 🔺نقد غیرعلمی نظرات دیگران در زمینه تکامل 🔺تکامل نوع به معنی تکامل انواع نیست 🔺جهل همبوشی به تکامل 🔺نظر آیت الله سیستانی 🔺نظر آیت الله کورانی 🔺جهل همبوشی در نقد دیگران 🔺نظر آیت الله شیرازی 🔺دو ادعا کاملا از روی جهل و بی

👍5👎1

22 Aug 2020, 13:29 UTC≈2,940 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

┄┄┅━⊹◆◆◆⊹━┅┄┄ 😊دیرین دیرین... طبق اطلاعات موثق اکثر ادمینهای این گروه سواد 👈 زیر دیپلم دارند اگر غیر از این هست ‌لطفا اسم و رزومه متخصصان محترمی که ادمین هستند 😎🤥 رو بفرمائید... ┄┄┅━⊹◆◆◆⊹━┅┄┄

👍1👎1

25 May 2020, 05:39 UTC≈6,600 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

┄┄┅━⊹◆◆◆⊹━┅┄┄ 🤯تناقض در کتب احمد همبوشی: در کتاب فتنه گوساله صفحه ۵۳ احمد به👌 جنبه اعجازی بارداری حضرت مریم سلام الله به پسر اشاره می کند و میگوید: دمیدن جبرئیل باعث شکل گیری جنین در👈 رحم میشود 😑در حالیکه در کتاب وهم الحاد صفحه ۱۹۵ الی ۱۹۸، توجیهی🤫 به خیال خودش علمی( ولی کاملا غیرعلمی) برای آن می اورد و اختلالی را به ایشان نسبت می دهد که در آن 👈 رحم وجود ندارد 🤐قضاوت با شما ┄┄┅━⊹◆◆◆⊹━┅┄┄

30 Dec 2019, 14:15 UTC≈2,760 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

┄┄┅━⊹◆◆◆⊹━┅┄┄ معجزه قرن(جهل احمد همبوشی)😂🙃از وهم الحاد👇 ☺️☺️اول شما بگو در سندرمی که👈 تخمدان و رحم👉 وجود ندارد (عدم حساسیت به آندروژن و همچنین کلاین فلتر) تخمک کجا تولید می‌شود؟ 😉و کجا لانه گزینی می کند؟ 🧐 بعد در مورد تخمک‌گذاری توضیح بده😜 ┄┄┅━⊹◆◆◆⊹━┅┄┄

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @naghdemolhed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,328,870 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“نقد کتاب وهم الحاد” (@naghdemolhed), 297 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/naghdemolhed.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.