4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,949–4,962 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 05:17
4,950
-4
9 Aug 2026, 19:56
4,954
-2
6 Aug 2026, 21:25
4,956
-4
6 Aug 2026, 08:47
4,960
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.16%
avg views ÷ 4,950 subscribers
Avg views / post
305
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
11 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
3,356
Reactions total
60
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 05:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
60 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
52
86.7%
💯
3
5.00%
🔥
3
5.00%
👍
1
1.67%
👏
1
1.67%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
الابتلاء في أحد معانيه، وأقول هنا أحد، لأن له من المعاني الكثير، هو جهاز لإفقاد الإنسان الثقة في كل ما سوى الله
فليس الغرض من الابتلاء تعذيب الإنسان لذاته، ولا إيقاع الضرر به لمجرد الضرر، البلاء في ظني، وفي جانب منه، يكون من أجل أن ينقل الإنسان إلى الإيمان وتحقيق التوحيد في معناه الجواني الوجداني، فالإنسان كائن يحتاج إلى التجربة حتى يتعلم الفكرة، ولا يكتفي غالبا بأن يعرفها معرفة عقلية بقدر يحتاج إلى أن يعيشها حتى ت…
كيف ساهم علم النّفس الغربي الأبيض في إرساء الفَوقية الاستعمارية :
"بالنسبة لعلماء النفس، ينبغي أن يبدأ تحويل محتوى عملنا ومصطلحاته وشروطه بالاعتراف بالدور الهائل الذي أدّاه التيار المهيمن في تخصصنا، أي علم النفس الغربي الأبيض، في إنشاء البنية التحتية الداعمة للاستعمار (Okazaki et al., 2008). ويَدين علم النفس بما حظي به من اعتراف ومكانة بارزة بوصفه جزءً من العلوم الاجتماعية الحديثة إلى دوره في بلورة منطق قائم على فكر…
نُشِرت مراجعة منهجية سنة 2025 في Iranian Journal of Psychiatry، جمعت الدراسات التي استخدمت النشاط الكهربائي للدماغ - EEG لدراسة تأثير الاستماع إلى القرآن. فحص الباحثون 236 ورقة، وانتهوا إلى 22 دراسة مستوفية للشروط.
والنتيجة العامة كانت مثيرة للاهتمام : ارتبط الاستماع إلى التلاوة في الدراسات بزيادة نشاط Alpha وTheta.
تظهر موجات Alpha (تقريبًا 8–13 Hz) عادةً بصورة أكبر أثناء اليقظة الهادئة والاسترخاء مع انخفاض الانشغ…
[رهافة] الحس والذكاء .. (٢)
أما فيما يتعلق بحاستنا الأكثر مركزية، تلك الحاسة الباطنية التي تدرك المسافة الفاصلة بين الرغبة وامتلاك المرغوب فيه، والتي ليست في حقيقتها سوى الإحساس بالمدة، أي الشعور بالزمن، الذي كان فيما مضى يكتفي بسرعة عَدْو الخيل، يبدو له اليوم أن القطارات السريعة بطيئة للغاية، والرسائل الكهربائية تجعله يكاد تموت من فرط الانتظار.
بل إن الأحداث نفسها أصبحت مطلوبة بوصفها غذاءً لا يكون أبدا حادًّا بالقد…
إليكُم ترجمةُ هذا النصّ البديع للأديب فاليري :
[رهافة] الحس والذكاء .. (١)
"لنبدأ بدراسة تلك الملكة الأساسية التي يُقابِلها كثيرون بالذكاء خطأ، مع أنها - على العكس من ذلك - القوة المحركة الحقيقية له؛ وهي الإحساس.
إذا كان إحساس الإنسان الحديث قد أصيب بخلل عميق بفعل الظروف الراهنة التي يعيشها، وإذا كان المستقبل يوحي بأن هذا الإحساس سيتعرض لمعاملة قاسية تزداد شدتها، فإن لنا أن نعتقد أن الذكاء نفسه سيتأثر تأثرا بالغًا …
Sensibilité et Intelligence .. (2)
=
Quant à notre sens le plus central, ce sens intime de la distance entre le désir et la possession de son objet, qui n'est autre que le sens de la durée, ce sentiment du temps, qui se contentait jadis de la vitesse de la course des chevaux, il trouve aujourd'hui que les rapides sont bien lents, et les messages électriques le font mourir de langueur. Enfin, les événements eux-mêmes…
Sensibilité et Intelligence .. (1)
"Commençons par l'examen de cette faculté qui est fondamentale et qu'on oppose à tort à l'intelligence, dont elle est, au contraire, la véritable puissance motrice; je veux parler de la sensibilité. Si la sensibilité de l'homme moderne se trouve fortement compromise par les conditions actuelles de sa vie, et si l'avenir semble promettre à cette sensibilité un traitement de plus en …
مسجد باريس الكبير؛
بتاريخ ٢١ صفر ١٤٤٨ الموافق ل ٥ غشت ٢٠٢٦
❤8🔥1
Signed إيمان حسباوي
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @nafsiat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 221,387 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نَفْسِيّاتٌ مَعْرفِيّة” (@nafsiat), 4,950 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nafsiat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
