Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

МУМЦФМ

@mumcfm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,238subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001358334129
TypeChannel
Username@mumcfm
Created8 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mumcfm

Growth

1,2371,2401,238.57 August 2026 — 1,240 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,240 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,239 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,237 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,238 subscribers1,2387 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,237–1,240 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 17:361,238+1
11 Aug 2026, 01:581,237-2
7 Aug 2026, 21:161,239-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:021,240no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:491,240first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.5%
avg views ÷ 1,238 subscribers
Avg views / post
340
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held9 (20 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total3,063
Reactions total32
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

32 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1650.0%
🔥825.0%
👍721.9%
🤝13.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 12:55 UTC162 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Исследование БМР. От наличных к криптоактивам: на пути к согласованному регулированию незаконных платежей 📑 Исследование Банка международных расчетов посвящено тому, как новые платежные инструменты — криптоактивы, стейблкоины и розничная цифровая валюта центрального банка (CBDC) — меняют подход к противодействию отмыванию денег и финансированию терроризма (ПОД/ФТ) по сравнению с наличными и банковскими счетами. ✅ В

2

31 Jul 2026, 13:14 UTC149 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @fedsfm_ruPhoto

Мошенники используют фейковые телеграм-боты от имени Росфинмониторинга 📱Мошенники представляются сотрудниками Федеральной службы по финансовому мониторингу и пытаются связаться с гражданами через чат-боты в мессенджере Телеграм. Злоумышленники используют символику ведомства, а в имени чат-бота - сокращение «fedsfm», маскируясь под официальный ресурс Службы. ❗Обратите внимание, у Росфинмониторинга нет телеграм-бото

2👍2🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 17:10 UTC251 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В МУМЦФМ прошел семинар по повышению эффективности работы УНФПП по выявлению подозрительных операций 🤩 30 июля в формате видеоконференцсвязи МУМЦФМ провел семинар «Обучение УНФПП способам выявления подозрительных операций, а также особенностям и преимуществам направления качественных СПО на основе выявленных рисков и типологий ОД/ФТ», направленный на повышение эффективности национальных антиотмывочных систем и рабо

2🔥1

27 Jul 2026, 09:50 UTC318 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Завершилась программа обучения для оценщиков ЕАГ, проходившая на базе МУМЦФМ с 20 по 24 июля 🤩 В пятидневном тренинге Секретариата ЕАГ на базе Международного учебно-методического центра финансового мониторинга приняли участие свыше 30 специалистов из Беларуси, Казахстана, Кыргызстана, России, Туркменистана и Узбекистана, отвечающих за проведение процедур взаимной оценки и последующий мониторинг. Программа включала

👍4🔥2

23 Jul 2026, 17:16 UTC352 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

15 августа стартует конкурс командных проектов в сфере финансовой безопасности ⚡️ Финалисты VI Международной олимпиады по финансовой безопасности, объединившись в команды, смогут разработать и представить собственные инициативы в области финбеза. Ключевое условие участия — самостоятельность разработки: проект должен быть оригинальным и не основанным на уже существующих решениях. Авторы лучших проектов получат денеж

1

23 Jul 2026, 06:40 UTC366 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

22 июля состоялось очередное межсессионное заседание Международной ассоциации учебно-методических центров государств-членов ЕАГ ✔️ В заседании под председательством генерального директора МУМЦФМ Ивана Уварова приняли участие представители организаций-участников Ассоциации, а также приглашенные представители Секретариата ЕАГ. 📆 Участники обсудили возможность вовлечения оценщиков в обучающие мероприятия Ассоциации, а

🔥2🤝1

22 Jul 2026, 16:01 UTC284 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Опубликован июньский номер журнала «Финансовая безопасность» 🔔 50-й выпуск журнала посвящен опыту построения системы региональной финансовой безопасности. В центре внимания — формирование единого межгосударственного механизма обеспечения финансовой безопасности в регионах, вклад региональных групп по типу ФАТФ (РГТФ) и усиление их взаимодействия в рамках Глобальной сети. 🩵 В эксклюзивном интервью Президент МЕНАФАТФ

2🔥1

21 Jul 2026, 05:45 UTC275 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В Москве стартовал очередной курс Секретариата ЕАГ по обучению оценщиков в рамках подготовки к третьему раунду взаимных оценок 📎 Обучение для оценщиков Евразийской группы продлится с 20 п о24 июля на базе МУМЦФМ. Мероприятие объединяет специалистов, которым предстоит обучиться логике обновленной Методологии ФАТФ и практических подходов к оценке эффективности национальных систем ПОД/ФТ. 📆 Программа выстроена таким о

4👍1🔥1

20 Jul 2026, 17:20 UTC906 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Школа по финбезу стартовала в Университете Лобачевского 🤩 20 июля 2026 года в рамках Международного движения по финансовой безопасности в ННГУ им. Лобачевского стартовала Международная летняя школа по финансовой безопасности. Школа объединит российских и зарубежных студентов, экспертов и представителей профильных организаций для совместного обсуждения актуальных вызовов в сфере ПОД/ФТ. 👥 На торжественном открытии

3

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @mumcfm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 172,724 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“МУМЦФМ” (@mumcfm), 1,238 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mumcfm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.