Channel
@mukkarinhazari
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
599subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002736200717 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mukkarinhazari |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mukkarinhazari |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:59 | 599 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 600 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 600 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
216 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 64 | 29.6% | |
| 👍 | 36 | 16.7% | |
| 💯 | 27 | 12.5% | |
| 🍓 | 24 | 11.1% | |
| 🤬 | 21 | 9.72% | |
| 💔 | 17 | 7.87% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 3.70% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 3.70% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 2.31% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 1.39% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.463% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.463% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.463% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 216reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 12 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
После того как нусейриты (сторонники партии «Баас») и носители зловещих чалм (режимные религиозные деятели) усердно преследовали учёного-хадисоведа Мухаммада Насируддина аль-Албани, изгнали его с родины, а затем преследовали, сажали в тюрьмы, убивали и изгоняли его учеников повсюду, — вот теперь ученики шейха аль-Албани и его почитатели вновь собираются в исламском Дамаске. Они рассказывают историю шейха и изучают ег…
❤15👍6⚡1✍1
«У меня для вас только меч»: трагедия непокорного эмира Это история о князе-герое Аль-Камиле Мухаммаде аль-Айюби (да помилует его Аллах) — правителе региона Майяфарикин (современная Турция). Его войска контролировали восток Турции, северо-запад Ирака и северо-восток Сирии. Он был справедлив и любим своим народом. Историк аз-Захаби говорил о нем: «Он был молодым, разумным, храбрым, внушающим благоговение, благодетел…
👍13❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3
📜 Исторический отрывок Год 463-й по хиджре (1070–1071 гг. н.э.). После падения его королевства Кастилия, изгнанный собственным братом Санчо, Альфонсо VI нашёл убежище в мусульманском городе Толедо. Он прибыл ко двору его правителя, царя аль-Мамуна, который принял беглеца с небывалым почтением. Аль-Мамун оказал Альфонсо щедрый приём, окружил его почётом и заботой, а когда час разлуки настал — с миром отпустил обрат…
❤7💯1
Photo, posted without a caption
💔3
Имам британской короны: как один человек изменил ход войны в Афганистане Цель была ясна Отвратить людей от джихада. Убедить их, что сражение с силами НАТО — это «смута (фитна), в которой нет блага», «путь к погибели», «доля хариджитов и еретиков». Он твердил, что их долг — «повиновение правителю (вали аль-амр) Хамиду Карзаю», которого назначила Америка. Выход против него — заблуждение. А тот, кто погибнет в борьбе…
🍓8💯7
Имам на службе Её Величества Когда атаки на британские войска в Афганистане усилились, британская армия прибегла к помощи человека по имени Асим Хафиз (Asim Hafiz), известного также как «имам Асим». Британец пакистанского происхождения, он имел воинское звание и передвигался в своей обычной исламской одежде, направляясь в мечети и на рынки. 👇👇👇👇
🤬5🤯3🍓1
Абу Зубейр Дагестани разбирает заявления Мурада Исмаилова и анализирует, как религиозная риторика используется против сторонников шариата и в интересах российской государственной пропаганды. В выпуске: — нападки на мусульман, желающих шариат — оправдание российской политики исламскими терминами — вопрос оккупации мусульманских земель — религиозное прикрытие государственной пропаганды ▶️ СМОТРИТЕ ВЫПУСК @sahwa_prod
👍6🍓1
Сокровища, которые не накормили Когда в Египте наступил «мучительный год» (аш-шидда аль-мустансария) и бедствия египтян достигли предела, одна женщина вышла на люди, неся свои жемчуга и драгоценности. Она стала взывать к толпе: «Кто возьмёт у меня эти сокровища и даст мне взамен пшеницу?» Но не нашлось никого, кто согласился бы на такой обмен. Тогда женщина воскликнула: «Если эти драгоценности бесполезны для мен…
❤9🍓7💯1🙏1
Photo, posted without a caption
🍓3❤1
Зуавы: элитная пехота, созданная Францией из предателей-Алжира Происхождение Когда Франция оккупировала Алжир в 1830 году, французы обнаружили там османские казармы, в которых несли службу алжирские солдаты. Это была армия, обученная по европейскому образцу: алжирские правители готовили её на смену янычарам после их разгрома. В августе 1830 года командующий французскими силами быстрого реагирования, занявшими горо…
🤬6🍓1
За свои заслуги Франция установила зуавам статую под мостом Альма в Париже — для измерения уровня воды в Сене. Полное затопление статуи служит сигналом опасного наводнения. Так колонизатор увековечил своих слуг жалкой статуей на дне сточных вод — символический жест, выражающий презрение к ним и их «естественное место» на низшей ступени человеческой иерархии.
💯7🤣5🍓1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mukkarinhazari. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 542,788 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@mukkarinhazari named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Abu Huzeyfa Kazvini” (@mukkarinhazari), 599 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mukkarinhazari.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.