Channel
@morticiasmith228
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
12subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003316865133 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @morticiasmith228 |
| Description | ох блин |
| Created | 9 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/morticiasmith228 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 12 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:42 | 12 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 11 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (9 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 177 |
| Reactions total | 22 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 05:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
22 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 14 | 63.6% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 13.6% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 13.6% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 4.55% | |
| 😇 | 1 | 4.55% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😟:: Ох, эм, это было быстро. . . Уже прилетел первый вопрос. Я и звезду поймать могу ! Шучу. Ладно. 📩 – Как относишься к другим Морти????? Так и думала, что спросите о других Морти. Но знаете, большинство из нас игнорят друг друга, даже не здороваясь. Мы, типо, принимаем существование огромного количества самих себя и просто забиваем. Если нас посадить в одно помещение и сказать « Хей, Морти » — обернутся все, …
❤🔥3
😟:: Воу, вас уже так много. . . Если вы не угараете надо мной, значит, интересуетесь ? Давайте устроим вопрос-ответ ! Видела, что это часто делают на всяких телешоу, поэтому. . . почему бы и нет ? Напишите мне что-нибудь. . . 🤗
❤🔥2😇1
😟:: Очередное подключение! Сегодня получилось стащить пространственную пушку. Почему-то мне показалось, что будет круто, если я свожу Джессику на рейд по вселенным и, ну, она типо будет впечатлена ииии. . . 🔇Всё пошло не по плану. Меня БУКВАЛЬНО вывернуло наизнанку и повезло, что Рита подоспела вовремя ! ! ! ( и надавала мне пиздюлей. . . ) Теперь Джесс не хочет со мной пересекаться, но я её не виню.😭 Стрёмно см…
🕊3👀2❤🔥1
😟:: Доброе утро, наверное ? ? ? 😇 Не думала, что вести канал почти то же самое, как писать в своём личном дневнике. Обычно, такие вещи я забрасываю, но вы даже ставите сердечки на мои сообщения, значит, кому-то есть дело до постов четырнадцатилетки ? ? ? ( местами это крипово. . . ) 💬 Кстати ! ! ! Кто-то всё же и написал мне, пускай и не на почту. И это. . . Ох, блин. Морти ! Это даже ожидаемо, но не то что …
❤🔥1
😟:: p.s. тупое слово, забудьте о том, что я его написала
😟:: напишите мне на почту, пожалуйста ! ! ! Хочу с кем-то початиться. 🤍 Рита до сих пор не освободилась, а мне очень скучно . . . Смотреть межвселенское кабельное с мамой хуже пытки, так что . . . Вы же можете мне накидать мемасиков с Ди Каприо или типо того ? ? ? 🤔 ладно, идея херня, сделайте что-то другое. . . Ну, в общем, а я вам расскажу про то, как мистер Голденфольд чуть не обоссался на уроке, когда увидел н…
❤🔥1
😟:: ээээ, привет ещё раз ? ? ? Не знаю, что обычно рассказывают в таких каналах, но А А А А А ! ! ! 😫 Сегодня я опять упала с постели, потому что Рита стащила меня с неё и потащила по своим делам. У меня огромная шишка на лбу теперь ! ! Ну серьёзно, она размером с мою вторую голову ! ( p.s. надеюсь, что у меня реально не отрастёт вторая. . . )🤩 Лишь бы Джессика не увидела меня с ней. . . 🤩 🤔 Хотя, можно по…
❤🔥3
Sticker, posted without a caption
😟:: ВАШУ Ж МАТЬ, ТАК ВЫ НЕ БОТ ? ? ? 😰 эм. . . стоит ли мне извиняться или типо того? Ладно, забейте. Давайте начнём с начала ? 🦋 Меня зовут Мортиша, Мортиша Смит. Вы наверняка знаете меня, как одну из альтернативных версий Морти и бла-бла-бла. 🤩 Но пока вы ещё не пролистали ленту дальше и остановились на моём канале, поймите, что все Морти – индивидуальны ! Не бывает кого-то хуже или лучше, более полезного и м…
❤🔥3⚡1👀1
😟:: ох блин, вы хотите пообщаться со мной ? это, типо, немножко стрёмно. 🤔 Рита сказала пользоваться вашим вниманием, пока она занята, ведь вы всё равно запрограмированная ею хрень (хотя я и сомневаюсь), так что. . . (´_ゝ`) . . . всё нормуль наверн? 🤩 📞ладно, давайте лучше поговорим о важном!!!? ➤ чат со мной ➤ важная инфа (ОЧЕНЬ советую прочитать) ➤ буст моего мегакрутого канала !!!
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @morticiasmith228. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,389,978 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝘔𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘢’𝘴 𝘥𝘪𝘢𝘳𝘺 / 𝘎𝘌𝘛 𝘖𝘜𝘛 𝘔𝘖𝘔 !!!!” (@morticiasmith228), 12 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/morticiasmith228.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.