Parenting & family — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
30 measurements spanning 44 days, net -1,182. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 92,561–94,097 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 03:55
92,738
-143
18 Sept 2026, 21:01
92,881
-73
16 Sept 2026, 15:37
92,954
-42
14 Sept 2026, 17:02
92,996
-45
13 Sept 2026, 00:21
93,041
-59
11 Sept 2026, 03:40
93,100
-57
8 Sept 2026, 04:22
93,157
-82
5 Sept 2026, 03:56
93,239
-60
3 Sept 2026, 10:08
93,299
-47
2 Sept 2026, 02:15
93,346
-31
1 Sept 2026, 05:26
93,377
-52
31 Aug 2026, 03:44
93,429
-17
30 Aug 2026, 00:12
93,446
-34
28 Aug 2026, 22:04
93,480
-33
27 Aug 2026, 23:02
93,513
-56
26 Aug 2026, 20:04
93,569
-38
25 Aug 2026, 17:28
93,607
-15
24 Aug 2026, 18:03
93,622
-8
23 Aug 2026, 02:24
93,630
-14
21 Aug 2026, 16:57
93,644
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 89 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.4%
avg views ÷ 92,738 subscribers
Avg views / post
16,100
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.24%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 September 2026
Posts held
13 (6 August 2026 – 15 September 2026)
Views total
96,800
Reactions total
1,200
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Sept 2026, 11:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,940
Videos
≈3,810
Links
≈161
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
8m 39s
Average length
1m 27s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,339 reactions across 13 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,612
78.2%
👍
228
6.83%
🎉
205
6.14%
🔥
151
4.52%
🥰
64
1.92%
😍
31
0.928%
😁
23
0.689%
👏
10
0.299%
🤔
9
0.27%
😱
2
0.06%
🙏
2
0.06%
👌
1
0.03%
😢
1
0.03%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,339 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 15 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
20
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 13 we hold a reading for · 54%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mommy_to_eva. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 15 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
7.69%
1 of 13 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
19,700
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
12,900
over 12 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqvmHSJf
1
3 September 2026
3 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 15 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Что делать, когда тревожно, есть вопросы, а пойти к психологу возможности нет🫂
Читать блог Вики Дмитриевой✊
Я уже много лет смотрю весь её контент, да и все интервью с ней😁 Мне очень понятна и интересна Вика как человек и конечно как психолог.
Многое беру и внедряю в жизнь, начиная от дружбы и заканчивая детьми.
Вика Дмитриева - семейный психолог, многодетная мама. В блоге разбирает жизненные ситуации и голосом б…
«Я вас всех ненавижу»🙃 Сейчас Еве 10 и я уверена, что никогда это не услышу, но еще не вечер😂
Я не была готова к тому, что однажды посмотрю на свою десятилетнюю дочь и пойму - передо мной уже подросток🙄
Нет, не полностью. И в этом как раз вся сложность.
Еве 10. Она может за 5 минут превратиться из весёлого ребёнка, который скачет по дому и смеётся над какой-нибудь ерундой, в человека с таким выражением лица, будто…
🌍📚Когда мы только начали всерьёз думать о переезде в Турцию, я сразу подумала о школе.
Первое, что пришло в голову, а почему бы детям не учиться в турецкой школе и параллельно продолжать обучение в российской онлайн-школе?
Ведь мы переезжаем не на каникулы. Мы хотим жить в другой стране, поэтому детям важно интегрироваться в новую среду, учить турецкий язык, общаться с местными детьми, но при этом можно не терять рос…
Сбривали брови?🤣 Я да😁
Мне бы сыворотку такую тогда..
Я отрастила свои ресницы с помощью популярной сыворотки от TopLash. Наносила всего 1 раз на ночь.
Через 21 день использования я уже увидела первые результаты😍 Реснички стали густые, начали расти новые. Уже через 1,5-2 месяца длина ресниц достигала максимум🔥
Самое главное, что эта сыворотка подходит и для тех, у кого чувствительные глаза. Она не содержит гормонов…
Подарили Еве очки Ray Ban с камерой, она давно о них мечтала. Эта шикарная копия появилась в нашем любимом магазине. Мы уже брали наушники Мие, стайлер Еве. Все прекрасно работает🤗
С очков можно👇
📸Делать фото
📹Записывать видео
🎶Слушать музыку и управлять громкостью прямо с очков, переключать треки, ставить на паузу
☎️Принимать вызовы и разговаривать через очки, благодаря встроенному микрофону и динамику
Очки в отли…
Вы не представляете, как тяжело мне досталась эта красивая девочка😍
Сначала целый год я не могла забеременеть. А когда наконец увидела две полоски, почти сразу начался сильнейший токсикоз🤢 Первые три месяца беременности я бесконечно лежала на сохранениях. Мне было страшно, потому что беременность первая, ты вообще не понимаешь, что нормально, а чего нужно бояться. Я вообще не могла есть и жила на капельницах.
Мы оч…
❤364🎉72🥰31👍15🔥10🙏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @mommy_to_eva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Варенички @varenikivtelege · 30,486 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 7 September 2026
Andreamamik LIVE @andreamamikk · 44,496 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 28 August 2026
zaremka.family👨👩👦 @zaremka_sai · 68,005 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 20 August 2026
yanka_blog @yankablogg · 26,859 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 31 here — alongside 30 others — read 11 September 2026
alenka.morozik @alenkamorozik · 101,160 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
Любава и Алёша Фитнес-семья @goodiets · 45,499 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 31 August 2026
Natasha.ffb @natasha_ffb_tyt · 39,585 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 30 August 2026
Кристина Русинович @russinovich_kristina · 132,422 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 6 September 2026
Крис блог🍿 @p_s_krisss · 89,914 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 17 August 2026
Ирина Смирнова @IrinaSmirnova1 · 190,510 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 August 2026
Томаблум и по-бырику @bloom_tomabloom · 31,287 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 6 September 2026
Алена и Марк @alena_ily · 23,530 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 18 September 2026
Катя ин Майами @katarina_elenik · 50,702 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 28 August 2026
АНАСТАВАНГА @anastavanga · 47,461 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
Didenko.katerina @provizordidenko · 57,483 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 23 August 2026
Lyalya_frutti @lyalya_frutti_channel · 52,705 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 24 August 2026
❤️🔥istinaglagolova Life❤️🔥 @istinaglagolova · 41,751 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 29 August 2026
Тоня Сальникова @pptonya · 113,552 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 14 August 2026
Та самая Ksuuuuu @ksuuuuu_govorit · 21,810 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 22 September 2026
Переверзева вещает @pereverzeva_live · 47,137 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 26 August 2026
Ольга Гажиенко @olgagajienko1 · 49,309 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 25 August 2026
LERADANYA_life @leradanya_lifeee · 212,647 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 25 August 2026
Kvadromama @marinka_kvadromama · 45,050 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 27 August 2026
Mariya_Allabyan @Mariya_Allabyan · 66,409 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“mommy_to_eva” (@mommy_to_eva), 92,738 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mommy_to_eva.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.