Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

西安资源黑榜

@mmheibang

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

705subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002656638709
TypeChannel
Username@mmheibang
Created16 May 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mmheibang

Growth

705708706.57 August 2026 — 708 subscribers8 August 2026 — 708 subscribers14 August 2026 — 705 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 705–708 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 15:46705-3
8 Aug 2026, 03:34708no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:18708first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 16 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

29 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2689.7%
😁26.90%
👍13.45%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 16 May 2025 to 27 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 May 2026, 15:41 UTC692 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⁣1️⃣被骗时间:2026/5/27 2️⃣被骗位置:上门服务,家中 3⃣被骗课费:900 4️⃣被骗经过:自称是个人但其实是中介,人来了后选了一个小时服务,结果十五分钟就非要走,说她没力气不做了,中介不仅不给任何说法,还直接删除屏蔽 5⃣骗子信息:苏宝@shisubaobao 友情提醒: 不见人,不服务,不付费 标签:#西安市 💟配图详见评论区 |客服 @xazhibot

21 May 2026, 10:11 UTC733 viewsread 7 August 2026

🔍筛选条件 🏢城市:#西安市,#咸阳市,#宝鸡市 🏠地区:#高新区,#曲江新区,#雁塔区,#碑林区,#未央区,#莲湖区,#新城区,#长安区,#灞桥区,#其他区

21 May 2026, 10:09 UTC706 viewsread 7 August 2026

⁣1️⃣被骗时间:2026/5/18 2️⃣被骗位置:未央区 3️⃣被骗课费:说先给定金开房 4️⃣被骗经过:QQ加好友,然后发了课表跟位置,说让外面开房间做,然后说她先去开房间等我,让发口令红包她去订房间,然后房间费用从课费里面抵扣,然后最后钱收了把我拉黑了。 5️⃣骗子信息:QQ:1825797461 与你号:18605213ymjugx 友情提醒: 不见人,不服务,不付费 标签:#西安市,#未央区 💟配图详见评论区 |客服 @xazhibot

19 Nov 2025, 09:03 UTC≈2,880 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⁣1️⃣被骗时间:2025/11/1 2️⃣被骗位置:九锦台,她说她晚上在这白天在未央区 3⃣被骗课费:被骗100定金 4️⃣被骗经过:交了定金到位置后说下来接我要我先验证,还发她自己在榜上的评价,(我怀疑是假的)不验证的话就先付钱再服务,我没见到她面,最后发了一堆个体工商户的码让我付钱,我说把定金退我,她发了个口令红包,但是是假的,而且迅速删除信息,后面就拉黑我了 5⃣骗子信息:电报 @keke6261 友情提醒: 不见人,不服务,不付费 标签:#西安市,#未央区 💟配图详见评论区 |客服 @xazhibot

👍1

28 May 2025, 10:37 UTC≈6,370 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⁣⁣1️⃣被骗时间:2025/4/9 2️⃣被骗地点:未央区的都市花园酒店 3⃣被骗金额:2000 4️⃣被骗经过:说好的包夜2000,来了呆了4个多小时,睡了3小时,接了个电话走了,让退一部分钱也不退,打电话不接,说她也算呆了4小时 5️⃣骗子信息:@Lameiziya 爱吃香菜 友情提醒: 不见人,不服务,不付费 标签:#西安市,#未央区 💟配图详见评论区 |客服 @xazhibot

7

28 May 2025, 10:34 UTC≈5,600 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⁣⁣1️⃣被骗时间:2025/4/22 2️⃣被骗地点:高新区 3⃣被骗金额:150 4️⃣被骗经过:网名雅琪,说是本人自聊,见面不是本人直接走,结果说是不给手机号码的话,需要收100定金,之后来了个大妈,说是100是给的别人,还需要给50路费。 5️⃣骗子信息:暂无 友情提醒: 不见人,不服务,不付费 标签:#西安市,#高新区 💟配图详见评论区 |客服 @xazhibot

2

28 May 2025, 09:48 UTC≈4,900 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⁣1️⃣被骗时间:2025/4/23 2️⃣被骗地点:未央区广丰花园1号楼 3⃣被骗金额:100 4️⃣被骗经过:骗子先收定金约课,到地点后必须要付清尾款才能知道具体位置,我来之前问过可以用现金不,他说可以,到了后就不行,中间又说退我我说可以,然后就开始套路了,先发女生的语音说不相信就算了,我还是让退,从微信到支付宝到银行卡他都说不行他被风控了,我说各退一步换个套餐,把剩下的转过去了,不说房间,还让我交2000保证金,然后我就让他退款,最后就消失拉黑我了 5️⃣骗子信息: 电报 @xiaozhi6665 友情提醒: 不见人,不服务,不付费 标签:#西安市,#未央区 💟配图详见评论区 |客服 @xazhibot

5

28 May 2025, 09:47 UTC≈4,200 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⁣1️⃣被骗时间:2025/4/23 2️⃣被骗地点:未央区 3⃣被骗金额:100 4️⃣被骗经过:骗子先收定金约课还能视频验证所以就背骗了,具体是先让你加群发红包后,让你退群他在加你,退了后就吧消息记录全删了,频道也拉黑了,频道找不见了,他还有个叫我的课房的,在哪个群里叫06梦倩说过开课,是个萝莉 5️⃣骗子信息: 电报 @chszi523 友情提醒: 不见人,不服务,不付费 标签:#西安市,#未央区 💟配图详见评论区 |客服 @xazhibot

4

28 May 2025, 09:04 UTC≈3,710 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⁣1️⃣被骗时间:2025/5/20 2️⃣被骗地点:未央区 3⃣被骗金额:900 4️⃣被骗经过:这个和之前骗子一样,订金先收900,但没有付其余尾款,约好时间后,再要求付尾款,未达到目的,就删记录删好友,同样课表也有报告怀疑是刷帖。 5️⃣骗子信息:@xiaozhi6665 友情提醒: 不见人,不服务,不付费 标签:#西安市,#未央区 💟配图详见评论区 |客服 @xazhibot

2

19 May 2025, 13:14 UTC≈3,640 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📋频道说明 这里发布骗子黑榜等资源,助你避免高风险资源! 📋娱乐导航 资源导航 资源分享 资源红榜 丝足尊享 资源报告 资源黑榜 车队中转 夜店甄选 快餐优享 外卖优选 舞厅娱乐 酒吧商K 新奇体验 足疗洗浴 两性天地 字母资源 科技分享 活动中心 网销经理 备用车队 书香文阁 车队大群 丝足大群 开车搜索 车队总群 丝足总群 陕西车队 扫街总群 砂舞总群 夜店总群 足浴总群 新奇总群 字母总群 快餐总群 上课通告 广播电台 群组导航 频道导航 客服中心

6😁2

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @mmheibang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 412,820 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“西安资源黑榜” (@mmheibang), 705 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mmheibang.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.