🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道

Channel
西安资源导航
@iqimm
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
15,903subscribers
-152 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001949382009 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @iqimm @mmpindao |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 26 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iqimm |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:55 | 15,903 | -12 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:37 | 15,915 | -7 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:35 | 15,922 | +3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:44 | 15,919 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 15,919 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:32 | 15,920 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 15,924 | +7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:21 | 15,917 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:40 | 15,918 | -9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:51 | 15,927 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:12 | 15,925 | -137 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:25 | 16,062 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:27 | 16,065 | +10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 16,055 | first reading |
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 26 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.65%
- avg views ÷ 15,903 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,530
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.036%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (26 April 2023 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,137 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
2,664 reactions across 18 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1,226 | 46.0% | |
| ❤ | 909 | 34.1% | |
| 👎 | 294 | 11.0% | |
| 👏 | 67 | 2.52% | |
| 🔥 | 64 | 2.40% | |
| 😁 | 43 | 1.61% | |
| 🥰 | 34 | 1.28% | |
| 🤷 | 5 | 0.188% | |
| 🍾 | 3 | 0.113% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.113% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 0.075% | |
| 😐 | 2 | 0.075% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.075% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 0.075% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.075% | |
| 🎅 | 1 | 0.038% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.038% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.038% | |
| 😘 | 1 | 0.038% | |
| 😴 | 1 | 0.038% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.038% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,664reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 26 April 2023 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
❤1
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
❤1
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
👉西安资源导航地图 📍车队群组导航 📍车队频道导航 📍优选门店导航 📍车队友群导航 📍优选老师导航 📍红榜老师导航 📍公榜老师导航 📍热门资源导航 📍活跃老师导航 📍特惠活动导航 📍车队客服导航 📍网销经理导航 📍夜店资源导航 📍丝足资源导航 📍舞厅资源导航 📍车队备用导航 📍常见问题导航 标签:#西安,#资源,#导航,#地图,#群组,#频道 💟中转 @xasio |客服 @xazhibot
❤9👍4😁1
👉西安丝足资源导航 📋丝足资源说明 1️⃣方便车友快速获取丝足资源; 📍高新区 👄[樱花丝艺] 👄[魅惑丝艺] 📍曲江新区 👄[龙椅选妃] 📍雁塔区 👄[纤姿丝艺]👄[鑫源抓龙筋] 👄[多米抓龙筋] 📍碑林区 👄[西米私影]👄[熟妇诱惑] 👄[觅爱时光] 📍未央区 👄[青舍丝足]👄[幼鱼丝足] 👄[绿茶全裸]👄[悦享丝艺] 👄[觅爱时光]👄[安安丝足] 👄[探秘花界]👄[桃舍小屋] 👄[小小丝足] 📍莲湖区 敬请期待...... 📍新城区 敬请期待...... 📍长安区 敬请期待...... 📍灞桥区 👄[鑫源抓龙筋] 📍其他区 敬请期待...... 🕒更新时间:2026/05/21 标签:#西安,#丝足,#资源,#导航 💟中转 @xasio |客服 @xazhibot
❤15👍1
👉西安舞厅资源导航 📋舞厅资源说明 1️⃣方便车友快速获取舞厅资源; 📍高新区 敬请期待...... 📍曲江新区 敬请期待...... 📍雁塔区 💃[金卡罗] 📍碑林区 💃[舞悦嘉和]💃[红河谷] 📍未央区 💃[九儿]💃[金苹果] 📍莲湖区 敬请期待...... 📍新城区 敬请期待...... 📍长安区 敬请期待...... 📍灞桥区 敬请期待...... 📍其他区 敬请期待...... 🕒更新时间:2025/11/26 标签:#西安,#舞厅,#资源,#导航 💟中转 @xasio |客服 @xazhibot
❤8👍1
👉西安夜店资源导航 📋夜店资源说明 1️⃣方便车友快速获取夜店资源; 📍高新区 ♦️[高新星探CLUB]♦️[北海道] 📍曲江新区 ♦️[青柠高端] 📍雁塔区 ♦️[梦LUXURY] 📍碑林区 敬请期待...... 📍未央区 敬请期待...... 📍莲湖区 ♦️[凤舞]♦️[夜上海] 📍新城区 ♦️[唐人] 📍长安区 ♦️[春澜会馆] 📍灞桥区 敬请期待...... 📍其他区 敬请期待...... 🕒更新时间:2025/11/26 标签:#西安,#夜店,#资源,#导航 💟中转 @xasio |客服 @xazhibot
❤9👍1
👉西安车队群组&频道备用 📋车队群组备用导航 👉西安车队备用 👉西安丝足备用 👉陕西娱乐备用 👉开车搜索备用 👉上课通告备用 👉西安足浴备用 👉西安扫街备用 👉西安新奇备用 👉西安砂舞备用 👉西安字母备用 👉西安快餐备用 👉西安夜店备用 📋车队频道备用导航 👉资源分享备用 👉资源红榜备用 👉丝足尊享备用 👉资源报告备用 👉资源黑榜备用 👉夜店甄选备用 👉外卖优选备用 👉快餐优享备用 👉舞厅娱乐备用 👉酒吧商K备用 👉新奇体验备用 👉扫街资源备用 👉足疗洗浴备用 👉字母资源备用 👉陕西资源备用 👉陕西娱乐备用 标签:#陕西,#西安,#车队,#群组,#频道,#备用 💟中转 @xasio |客服 @xazhibot
❤266👍8🤯2💩1😁1
👉西安车队客服导航 📋负责投稿上榜和常见问题等 ✈️客服小智 @xazhibot 📋负责推广合作和招商咨询等 ✈️客服小唐 @xaservicebot 标签:#西安,#车队,#客服 💟中转 @xasio |客服 @xazhibot
❤15👍6
👉西安公榜老师导航 📋公榜老师说明 1️⃣近期新上榜老师资源; 2⃣CJ风险性较高; 📍高新区 ⚠️[六六]⚠️[小糯米]⚠️[冰冰] ⚠️[梦芯]⚠️[小可爱]⚠️[梦欲] ⚠️[瑶妹儿]⚠️[风灵]⚠️[湘湘] ⚠️[依依]⚠️[初恋]⚠️[苏苏] ⚠️[喜糖]⚠️[伊柠]⚠️[静书] 📍曲江新区 敬请期待...... 📍雁塔区 ⚠️[可欣]⚠️[金宝宝]⚠️[凡凡] ⚠️[瑶瑶]⚠️[糖果]⚠️[韩菲] ⚠️[叶子]⚠️[奶酪]⚠️[美宸] ⚠️[林薇]⚠️[丽莎]⚠️[洋洋] ⚠️[甜蜜蜜]⚠️[暖茶]⚠️[丹丹] ⚠️[朵儿]⚠️[悦儿]⚠️[小婉] ⚠️[安瑾]⚠️[笑笑]⚠️[大白兔] ⚠️[奶茶妹]⚠️[洁洁]⚠️[荷月] ⚠️[嘉莹]⚠️[可乐]⚠️[崽崽] 📍碑林区 ⚠️[柒玥]⚠️[小雨]⚠️[晓敏] ⚠️[新儿]⚠️[团团]⚠️[欣怡] ⚠️[媛媛]⚠️[小…
❤82👍22👎2👏1🤔1🥰1😴1
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @iqimm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 122,035 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@unuhi · 6,60016 posts西安两性天地
@lxtiandi · 3,6117 posts西安资源红榜
@iqiaa · 12,7925 posts西安资源报告
@sxwenge · 3,4415 posts西安夜店甄选
@ydhuisuo · 6,2073 posts西安丝足尊享(备用)
@immsizu · 101 post西安资源分享(备用)
@ixashare · 131 post西安酒吧商K
@jiubalist · 6221 post西安科技分享
@kejishare · 5941 post西安快餐优享
@kuaicanlist · 7611 post西安资源报告(备用)
@mmbaogao · 6971 post西安资源黑榜
@mmheibang · 7051 post西安资源红榜(备用)
@mmhongbang · 211 post西安扫街资源
@saojieshare · 6851 post陕西西安资源分享
@sxfenxiang · 2,0271 post陕西西安娱乐资源
@sxyule · 1,5381 post西安新奇体验
@xqtiyan · 5871 post西安夜店甄选(备用)
@yedianlist · 5241 post西安舞厅娱乐
@yulelist · 1,4581 post西安字母资源
@zimulist · 8071 post西安足疗洗浴
@zuyushare · 7301 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@TeleTopOrg · 33,0795 posts西安资源分享
@eoopo · 6,9954 posts西安丝足尊享
@epeuu · 5,6174 posts西安资源红榜
@iqiaa · 12,7922 posts西安广播电台
@unuhi · 6,6002 posts西安活动中心
@xahuodong · 2,4422 posts西安夜店甄选
@ydhuisuo · 6,2072 posts西安舞厅娱乐
@yulelist · 1,4582 postsbeibei890213
@beibei890213 · 121 postTelegram 全国地方群联盟
@cntgg · 36,0601 post西安丝足尊享(备用)
@immsizu · 101 post西安资源分享(备用)
@ixashare · 131 post西安科技分享
@kejishare · 5941 post西安两性天地
@lxtiandi · 3,6111 post西安修车总队认证官方娱乐频道
@mexi002 · 4,2301 post西安资源红榜(备用)
@mmhongbang · 211 post陕西西安资源分享
@sxfenxiang · 2,0271 post西安资源报告
@sxwenge · 3,4411 post陕西西安娱乐资源
@sxyule · 1,5381 post西安上门洗浴会所资源频道更新
@xianvipever · 3411 post西安新奇体验
@xqtiyan · 5871 post西安夜店甄选(备用)
@yedianlist · 5241 post西安字母资源
@zimulist · 8071 post西安足疗洗浴
@zuyushare · 7301 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@iqimm named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 7 posts, 8 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 6 posts, 8 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 6 posts, 8 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“西安资源导航” (@iqimm), 15,903 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iqimm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.