Channel
@mmfblockchaincrypto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
124subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003792056126 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mmfblockchaincrypto |
| Description | Posts include definitions and explanations about blockchain, how to understand all things crypto, defi, Quantum computing and more. This is not all encompassing research. Posts don’t mean endorsement. LEARN. I am not a financial advisor. Entertainment pur |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 22 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mmfblockchaincrypto |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 124 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:52 | 124 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 22 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (22 June 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 522 |
| Reactions total | 24 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 02:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
32 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 40.6% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 34.4% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 15.6% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 6.25% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 3.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🏆 The International Olympiad in AI finished yesterday in Astana. 🇷🇺 The Russian team took first place in the team competition, and Artem Gorokhov from my home city won the individual event. Well done! 💪 🇰🇿 I'm equally happy for the host country, Kazakhstan, whose Dauzhan Beketov took the second-highest individual score.👏 📩We're in touch with the organizers to deliver the winners' prizes from Telegram ($106,500+) s…
🍎 Last night, Apple briefly removed Telegram from the App Store because a single user had planted illegal pornographic content in a public group chat. ⬅️ Telegram was restored within hours. But I want to explain what happened — to warn other app developers and help protect online communities from similar attacks. 🧹Because Telegram quickly removes illegal content from public groups using user reports, AI filters, co…
👍2🔥1
⚡ THE CURIOUS CORNER Special Edition Is America Preparing to Reach Q-Day… And Survive It? What happens when the same government starts building fault-tolerant quantum computers — while ordering its most sensitive systems to replace the encryption they may one day break? This is no longer hypothetical. It is now a national schedule. Special thanks to @mmfons Her latest post gave us one thread to pull: “They are for…
👍3❤1🤔1
On June 30, 2026, the NSA and US Army announced new QuantumEAGLe initiative under Trump’s Quantum executive order. They are formalizing the ecosystem. https://www.nsa.gov/Press-Room/Press-Releases-Statements/Press-Release-View/Article/4529557/nsa-devcom-army-research-office-launch-quantumeagle-initiative/
❤2
U.S. seizes $2.12M crypto wallet linked to investment scam - AMBCrypto https://ambcrypto.com/u-s-seizes-2-12m-crypto-wallet-linked-to-investment-scam/
👌1🔥1
X launches peer-to-peer money transfer feature, but crypto is notably absent https://cryptobriefing.com/x-launches-peer-to-peer-money-transfers/
Digital Wallet Basics - Q&A 💜 As digital assets and blockchain technology continue to evolve and play a larger role in our financial system, many people are asking basic questions about digital wallets. Even if you’re not interested in buying digital assets right now, understanding the fundamentals can give you valuable exposure. Here are some common Q&A's: Q: Do I need a digital wallet now? A: No. You do not ne…
❤1
⚡ THE CURIOUS CORNER Special Edition ❓Everyone Talks About Non-Custodial Wallets... But What Does That Actually Mean? Telegram recently announced its ambition to integrate a native non-custodial crypto wallet directly into its application. At the same time, several blockchain projects are introducing or testing their own wallets. Rather than focusing on one announcement, let's use these developments as an opportunit…
❤3
One of the companies was founded in 2010. Research has been going one before that one for decades. 👇 Great find Ladybug’sTruth!
I’m just gonna leave this right here. This is today’s article.. Let’s just pray the good guys have this, but it is interesting that Belarus is close to Russia.. Very interesting https://quantumzeitgeist.com/russia-quantum-computing-companies/ I have a question for you. A quantum computers doesn’t exist then why is there a catalogue for them?
👍1
⚡ THE CURIOUS CORNER Special Edition ❓ QFS: Are We Already Living It Without Realizing It? For years... Three letters have sparked endless debates. QFS. For some, it represents hope. For others, skepticism. For many... it has become a symbol onto which everyone projects their own expectations. But what if we've been asking the wrong question all along? Many people imagine a new financial system as a single event. A…
❤1
⚡ THE CURIOUS CORNER Special Edition ❓ Why would a blockchain choose NOT to launch on traditional exchanges? Yesterday, ATQM made an announcement that surprised many people. The project confirmed it would not launch on traditional cryptocurrency exchanges. Instead, it plans to introduce its own marketplace. That raises a much more interesting question than whether this is a good or bad idea... Why do exchanges exi…
👍4❤1🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @mmfblockchaincrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mmfons/ blockchain,crypto,Quantumcomputing” (@mmfblockchaincrypto), 124 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mmfblockchaincrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.