Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

French Anons- 👁️EYES WIDE OPEN 🔎

@frenchanons

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

552subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002433463503
TypeChannel
Username@frenchanons
DescriptionRelais d’informations, lecture des signaux et mise en perspective de l’actualité 🔍 Eyes Wide Open, esprit critique et optimisme assumé ✨ Spread the spark 🔥
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/frenchanons

Growth

5527 Aug 2026, 18:00 — 552 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 03:36 — 552 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 18:008 Aug 2026, 03:36
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 551–553 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 03:36552no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:00552first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.9%
avg views ÷ 552 subscribers
Avg views / post
126
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held18 (29 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,146
Reactions total92
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 03:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
7,840
Videos
1,600
Links
2,740

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 05s
Average length
1m 05s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

92 reactions across 17 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4144.6%
👏1718.5%
99.78%
🍾55.43%
👌55.43%
🙏55.43%
😱33.26%
🔥22.17%
👀11.09%
😎11.09%
🤔11.09%
🥰11.09%
🥴11.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC57 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

1👍1🤔1🥴1

6 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC84 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⚡ LE COIN DES CURIEUX — ÉDITION SPÉCIALE 🗳️ UN VOTE N’EST PAS UNE TRANSACTION. Une blockchain post-quantique peut préserver un bulletin de vote. Mais peut-elle protéger une élection ? Il y a quelques jours, nous avons envoyé 0,01 ATQM d’une adresse à une autre. L’explorateur affichait l’expéditeur, le destinataire, le montant, l’heure, le bloc et les frais. La transaction devenait partie intégrante d’un registre

👍3👏1

5 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC101 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🎬 RENDEZ-VOUS DES CURIEUX Épisode 18 🛠️ Comment corriger les erreurs... sans détruire l'information quantique ? Dans l'épisode précédent... Nous avons découvert que les qubits sont extrêmement fragiles. La moindre perturbation peut provoquer une erreur. Mais alors... Pourquoi ne pas simplement vérifier régulièrement si un qubit est correct ? Le problème... C'est que mesurer un qubit modifie son état. Contrairement à

👍42👏1🙏1

5 Aug 2026, 02:54 UTC63 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @philgodlewskii4Video

HUGE announcement 🔥 October 16-18, Minsk is hosting the ATOM Global AI EXPO. 215,000 square feet of exhibition space. Over 40,000 people. More than 100 live AI projects. 30+ speakers from around the world. ATOM's projects will be front and center. Everything you've already heard about — and a lot you haven't heard about yet. The expo is three days. But for you — it could be a full guest week running October 12–18

👌1

4 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC114 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⚛️ LE RENDEZ-VOUS DES CURIEUX 🎬 Épisode 18 — Demain à 7 h 17 Dimanche, nous avons vu pourquoi les qubits sont si fragiles. La moindre perturbation peut modifier l’information qu’ils transportent… et provoquer une erreur. Avec un ordinateur classique, la solution semble simple : on regarde le bit, on repère l’erreur et on la corrige. Mais dans le monde quantique, les règles changent. 👁️ Observer directement un qubit p

👍4👏1🙏1

3 Aug 2026, 02:45 UTC125 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @StoryOfBlackBond

🇫🇷BOMBE SUR L’AUTISME : LE MENSONGE DE 30 ANS EST OFFICIELLEMENT MORT Le CDC vient de changer son site officiel : « L’affirmation “les vaccins ne causent pas l’autisme” n’est PAS basée sur des preuves. » Pourquoi ? Parce que RFK Jr. a reçu l’étude de 52 pages de nicolas Hulscher et son équipe Résultat de l’étude peer-reviewed : 79 % des études (107 sur 136) montrent un LIEN POSITIF entre vaccins et autisme / trou

4🍾4👏2😱1

2 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC151 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👍52👏2🍾1🙏1

2 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC133 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🎬 RENDEZ-VOUS DES CURIEUX Épisode 17 ⚡ Pourquoi les ordinateurs quantiques font-ils autant d'erreurs ? Dans l'épisode précédent... Nous avons découvert que le Q-Day pourrait un jour bouleverser certains systèmes de chiffrement. Mais alors... Une question s'impose. Si les ordinateurs quantiques sont si puissants... Pourquoi ne sont-ils pas déjà capables de le faire ? La réponse tient en un mot. Fragilité. Contrairemen

👍3🙏2👌1👏1

1 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC117 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⚛️ LE RENDEZ-VOUS DES CURIEUX 🎬 Épisode 17 — Demain à 7h17 Nous avons vu que les ordinateurs quantiques pourraient un jour résoudre des problèmes aujourd'hui impossibles. Alors... ❓ Pourquoi ne sont-ils pas déjà partout ? La réponse est étonnante. Chaque qubit est incroyablement puissant... mais aussi incroyablement fragile. 🌡️ Une légère variation de température. 📳 Une vibration. ⚡ Un champ électromagnétique. ☢️ Un

👍3👏1

1 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC132 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Celui qui prétend avoir définitivement terminé la recette a probablement sauté le dixième non-commandement. Être éveillé, ce n’est pas ne plus jamais se tromper. C’est apprendre à reconnaître plus rapidement lorsqu’un récit tente de penser, de ressentir ou de choisir à notre place — y compris lorsqu’il s’agit de notre propre récit.

👍5👏3👀1👌1🥰1

1 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC195 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🧭 LE COIN DES CURIEUX 😜 HORS-SÉRIE DU SAMEDI L’ÉVEIL POUR LES NULS La recette en dix non-commandements pour ne plus avaler tout cru le récit du moment. Ingrédients Une bonne dose de curiosité Plusieurs sources, y compris contradictoires Une pincée de doute Beaucoup de recul Le courage de dire « je ne sais pas encore » Un ego démontable sans outil particulier Et surtout… aucun gourou indispensable, même s’il parle t

👍6👏3👌1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @frenchanons. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 839,894 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“French Anons- 👁️EYES WIDE OPEN 🔎” (@frenchanons), 552 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/frenchanons.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.