Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 色慾美魔女😋

Channel

色慾美魔女😋

@mm8754

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

759subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002592524867
TypeChannel
Username@mm8754
Description☎️蜜桃聯絡方式: LINE:nyum7 Gleezy:mmm2587 Telegram1️⃣ @mitao869 Telegram2️⃣ @MM6483 🍑蜜桃更多頻道: 美魔女 t.me/mm8754 巨乳控 t.me/Chest863 奶水媽媽 t.me/mother987 單親媽媽 t.me/mitao855 客評查看 t.me/mitao786
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/mm8754

Growth

7598 Aug 2026, 00:31 — 759 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 01:50 — 759 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 00:318 Aug 2026, 01:50
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 758–760 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 01:50759no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:31759first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.5%
avg views ÷ 759 subscribers
Avg views / post
118
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held8 (31 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total941
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
905
Videos
2
Links
376

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
150.0%
👍150.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTC78 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

眼睛會勾人的小女人~⤵️點擊看資料 寶兒 165 E 50 38歲 感謝今天熟客哥哥相信蜜桃的推薦,直接聽蜜桃的安排~開箱 眼神會勾人、女友感封頂 的健美大奶天菜! #北部 #台北客評 #新北客評 客評詳情👀 t.me/mitao786/691

👍1

5 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC96 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

今日更多資訊 請看⤵️ https://t.me/mitao855

1

5 Aug 2026, 08:56 UTC145 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

性感御姐,身材比例好 漂亮又放得開,全程主動高配合 從浴室和你玩到床上,從小頭吃到蛋蛋 寶兒 165 E 50 38歲 #北部 #台北推薦 #新北推薦 客評👇點擊查看 🫧點我查看表哥評論-1 ㊙️ 預約諮詢⤵️ 蜜桃LINE:nyum7 蜜桃Gleezy:mitao85 蜜桃Telegram①: @MM6483 蜜桃Telegram②: @mitao869 台灣桃花源總群指引💘 @T_ttzy

3 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC115 viewsread 8 August 2026

性感氣質熟女~⤵️點擊看資料 芸曼 158 48 E 36歲 哥哥大讚:截至目前約過身材最好的!進門直接當廢人,連洗澡擦乾都不用動手,還送超強舌功+主動按摩! #北部客評 #新竹客評 客評詳情👀 t.me/mitao786/670

3 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTC126 viewsread 8 August 2026

雙飛服務控天花板~⤵️點擊看資料 凱莉 35歲 163 D 47kg 雅芬 34歲 160 C 45kg 左擁右抱尊榮感拉滿!雙胸漫游+三人舌吻+面騎品茗,這輩子沒體驗過這麼爽的雙飛! 想要一次體驗兩位成熟姐姐雙重包覆的哥哥,手腳要快,趕快敲蜜桃卡位安排唷😘 #雙飛 #雙飛客評 客評詳情👀 t.me/mitao786/661

2 Aug 2026, 16:53 UTC131 viewsread 8 August 2026

豐潤人妻天菜~⤵️點擊看資料 美英 158 52 D+ 40歲 一起洗澡還幫忙溫柔搓背!床上水流不止,狂讚你厲害,直接排進哥哥約過妹子的前三名! #中部客評 #台中客評 客評詳情👀 t.me/mitao786/661

1 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC102 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ttuuauPhoto

【新手必讀】約妹須知與預約規則指南‼️ 桃花源 致力於提供透明、高品質的服務。 為了避免雙方認知落差 耽誤彼此寶貴的時間與車馬成本 請首次預約的哥哥仔細閱讀以下說明。 ‼️為什麼我們不接 現場猶豫刁難客 ⚠️ 這位哥哥預約後,妹子已按時抵達旅館附近,但哥哥卻在現場卡了近 30 分鐘不願開房。 ⚠️當然蜜桃必須聲明: ✅一切消費都是建立在雙方自願情況下完成的 蜜桃這邊沒有強買強賣‼️一切消費的前提: 都是你們見到人滿意之後再付款‼️ ‼️不接受見到妹妹成交了,甚至已完成服務之後的退款需求‼️】 ⚠️一下拿手機偷拍照片問這是妹子嗎? 遲遲不上樓。最後只能遺憾取消,白白耽誤妹子的時間。 ‼️為什麼我們會堅持 開房後妹子才上去?⚠️ 1️⃣ 保護妹子與客人的隱私與安全 ❗️應召外送不同於定點,外送妹子隻身前往陌生地點,確保有登記好的房間是妹子最基本的安全保障。 ❗️避免妹子在大廳/路邊傻等,引來櫃檯關注或路人側目,這對客人與妹

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @mm8754. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 365,960 of 1,584,733entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“色慾美魔女😋” (@mm8754), 759 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mm8754.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.