初次兼職鄰家妹~⤵️點擊看資料 夢璐 155 C 45 23歲 #蜜桃私心推 感謝熟客大哥~想念了很久的年輕正妹~這次終於有空來~見到之後直接就說這個可以 蜜桃超感謝這次機會有給到我~😘 #北部客評 #台北客評 #新北客評 視覺年齡:25 身高:158 體重:50 身型:小隻馬 長髮或短髮:長髮 姐妹的優點:慢熟健談好聊天! 是否有奶水:沒約奶水媽媽可不填或填否 罩杯大小/是否KG:C/否 聊天互動度:冷豔慢熟 服務參與度:剛出來的大學生,剛見面就看到健康的小麥色肌膚,讓人感覺到有點羞澀,打過招呼後直接到浴室洗過澡後各自到房間內後妹妹先塗了潤滑後,上了床摟著她親著這時手往下滑到妹妹外陰時發現已經開始慢慢的流出淫水,這時我先慢慢的先一指伸進小淫穴裡發現到~那是先前沒摸過的柔軟肌膚充滿著小穴內,但往豆豆位置輕按時發現妹妹還是想直接跳過前戲口完女下,就問他或是可以試著在上面搖到結束,但妹妹表示不太會在上面服務只能女下 刺青或抽煙:左…

Channel
蜜蜜回饋本💗
@mitao786
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
347subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002608886132 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mitao786 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mitao786 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:59 | 347 | +2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:23 | 345 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 340 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 340 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:40 | 339 | first reading |
Engagement
4 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.6%
- avg views ÷ 347 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 50.8
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 4 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 4 (6 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 203 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
纖瘦反差騷貨~⤵️點擊看資料 雨希 166 C 46 27歲 感謝熟客大哥~ 一如既往的信任,有一次直接讓蜜桃安排~果然結果也沒有讓他失望呢! #北部客評 #台北客評 #新北客評 視覺年齡:27-28 身高:165 體重:40+ 身型:身形修長、維瘦 長髮或短髮:長髮 姐妹的優點:很騷、很主動 是否有奶水:否 罩杯大小/是否KG:B 聊天互動度:100% 服務參與度:100% 刺青或抽煙:有一點刺青 整體滿意度:100% 是否會回約:會 姐妹需要改進的地方:無 蜜桃需要改進的地點:無 跟姐妹的約會小分享: 剛進門初次見面就覺得不錯,繳完水費後就去簡單洗個澡,還順便漏浴缸打篹結束一起泡個澡, 首先在床上摸摸親親,親吻撫摸的過程能感受到她有點害羞,覺得很可愛,摸著摸著有水不斷溢出,讓我心頭的逐漸熱起來。 開始吸的時候,上下先來回舔之後在入口慢慢吸,之後漸漸加快速度且吸得很賣力,有種要被吸乾的感覺, 吸到一半時,她的火像是被點燃般…
敏感水多奶水媽媽~⤵️點擊看資料 👩🏻娜娜:165-D-50-25歲 哥哥剛出院就迫不及待來卡位,大讚:吸到溫熱奶水那一刻真的太神了!裡面又緊又會吸! #無門檻奶水媽媽客評 視覺年齡:24歲(完全看不出已經生過寶寶) 身高:165 體重:50 身型:高挑勻稱,比例極佳 長髮或短髮:長髮 姐妹的優點:極品奶水媽媽 是否有奶水:是 罩杯大小/是否KG:D-E奶 聊天互動度:滿分! 服務參與度:滿分! 刺青或抽煙:無 整體滿意度:滿分! 是否會回約:會 姐妹需要改進的地方: 蜜桃需要改進的地點: 跟姐妹的約會小分享:手剛開完刀出院,手還不太利索但實在太想皮了,看到蜜桃這有奶媽娜娜報班,立馬卡位!門一打開,皮膚保養的很好,素顏也不會不好看。交了水費梳洗後上床,一陣熱吻愛撫後,娜娜主動示意想被親吻秘密花園,我便仔細探尋了一番,過程中娜娜的小手也沒閒著,溫柔挑逗著我的小老弟,還能感受到她的奶香,我也順勢湊了上去,稍微一吮吸就有吸到了滿口奶…
H罩杯狂野辣妹~⤵️點擊看資料 佳蓉 161 52 H 26歲 無敵飢渴大UU辣妹!出水後居然還把雞雞塞回去自己幹,爽到直接跪服! 想要體驗被大奶妹塞回去榨乾的哥哥快私訊蜜桃預約~~ #北部客評 #台北客評 #新北客評 視覺年齡:25歲 身高:160 體重:50+ 身型:肉感巨乳 長髮或短髮:長髮 姐妹的優點: 胸部超級巨大且手感非常柔軟,床上超狂野!出水後還會主動把雞雞塞回去自己幹 罩杯大小/是否KG:真H奶 聊天互動度:態度溫柔,,相處起來非常舒服。 服務參與度:100% 刺青或抽煙:無 整體滿意度:滿分! 是否會回約:肯定會! 姐妹需要改進的地方: 蜜桃需要改進的地點:蜜桃推薦的從不讓人失望 跟姐妹的約會小分享:開門見到佳蓉我就表示OK,然後挽著我的手帶我進房間。洗完澡後抱著佳蓉在床上摸摸親親,她舌頭非常柔軟,會一直吸咬我的嘴唇,味道甜甜的。 佳蓉的大UU手感真的超級柔軟!我的頭都可以埋進去!小穴外觀好看、乾淨沒有味道,…
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @mitao786. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 233,332 of 1,584,486entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“蜜蜜回饋本💗” (@mitao786), 347 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mitao786.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.