Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🇹🇼夢夢台灣中價位茶💰6K-8K賴mcmc88

@mm090224

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

206subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003743336036
TypeChannel
Username@mm090224
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mm090224

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 7 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

197206201.56 August 2026 — 197 subscribers7 August 2026 — 197 subscribers7 August 2026 — 199 subscribers14 August 2026 — 206 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 196–207 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 07:06206+7
7 Aug 2026, 06:35199+2
7 Aug 2026, 04:33197no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:30197first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.8%
avg views ÷ 206 subscribers
Avg views / post
79.8
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.617%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held13 (21 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total1,038
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 08:28 UTC9 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @xr956Photo

💖 中部新妹無照推薦(已試車)💖 今天幫大家整理一波中部近期超推的新妹~ 全部都是客人已試車過的真實評價 價格香、妹妹讚,身材資訊也都是準確的哦! 都是客人試車後親身回饋的真實資訊與評價 想約的可以直接私訊夢夢 夢夢📱TG: @mm0902 夢夢📱LINE:mcmc88或621158 夢夢⭐ Gleezy 搜mcmc88 📱論壇 www.alice8833.com ✔️一鍵加入性福樂園🍑⬇️ https://t.me/addlist/ADJkF2PPZQxjYTM1

5 Aug 2026, 08:28 UTC7 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @xr956Photo

💖 南部新妹無照推薦(已試車)💖 今天幫大家整理一波南部近期超推的新妹~ 全部都是客人已試車過的真實評價 價格香、妹妹讚,身材資訊也都是準確的哦! 都是客人試車後親身回饋的真實資訊與評價 想約的可以直接私訊夢夢 夢夢📱TG: @mm0902 夢夢📱LINE:mcmc88或621158 夢夢⭐ Gleezy 搜mcmc88 📱論壇 www.alice8833.com ✔️一鍵加入性福樂園🍑⬇️ https://t.me/addlist/ADJkF2PPZQxjYTM1

5 Aug 2026, 08:27 UTC7 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @xr956Photo

💖 雙北新妹無照推薦(已試車)💖 今天幫大家整理一波雙北近期超推的新妹~ 全部都是客人已試車過的真實評價 價格香、妹妹讚,身材資訊也都是準確的哦! 都是客人試車後親身回饋的真實資訊與評價 想約的可以直接私訊夢夢 夢夢📱TG: @mm0902 夢夢📱LINE:mcmc88或621158 夢夢⭐ Gleezy 搜mcmc88 📱論壇 www.alice8833.com ✔️一鍵加入性福樂園🍑⬇️ https://t.me/addlist/ADJkF2PPZQxjYTM1

2 Aug 2026, 04:58 UTC21 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @xr956Photo

我這個年紀 可以沒有愛情 但不能沒有業績! 每分鐘都在線,每一則訊息、每一筆安排,都是我靠自己撐起來的成績單 各位大老闆來密我吧 3000 4000 5000也是愛 夢夢📱TG: @mm0902 夢夢📱LINE:mcmc88或621158 夢夢⭐ Gleezy 搜mcmc88 📱論壇 www.alice8833.com ✔️一鍵加入性福樂園🍑⬇️ https://t.me/addlist/ADJkF2PPZQxjYTM1

31 Jul 2026, 11:47 UTC28 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @xr956

#特價秒殺妹 💰元元 160cm E奶 25歲 職業:在職護理師 #特價6000 💰甜心 160cm D奶 20歲 職業:在校學生 #特價7000 💰北北 157cm C奶 19歲 職業:花店妹 #特價6000 💰小莉 160cm B奶 18歲 職業:在校學生 #特價12000 💰嘉琪 165cm C+奶 25歲 職業:花旗櫃姐 #特價6000 💰艾菲 164cm E奶 25歲 職業:百貨櫃姐 #特價7000 💰比比 158cm C奶 18歲 職業:在校學生 #特價8000 💰小燕 164cm C奶 27歲 職業:秘書 #特價4000 💰琪琪 162cm D奶 25歲 職業:幼教老師 #特價5000 夢夢📱TG: @mm0902 夢夢📱LINE:mcmc88或621158 夢夢⭐ Gleezy 搜mcmc88 📱論壇 www.alice8833.com ✔️一鍵加入性福樂園🍑⬇️ https://t.me/ad

31 Jul 2026, 11:47 UTC31 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @xr956

搶約 高中生 高中生 高中生 #雙北推薦 (高中生) 安樂高中 星星 150-38-A 18歲(7500) 育成高中 小樂 148-39-b 18歲(8000) 中和高中 心力 155-40-C 18歲(10000) 辭修高中 拉拉 165-50-E 18歲(12000) 文德高中 瑞瑤 160-45-C-18歲(10000) #新竹推薦(高中生) 光復高中 蘭兒 148-35-A-18歲(6000) 東泰高中 米莉 155-42-B-18歲(5000) 建工高中 可愛 160-48-D-18歲(8000) 竹東高中 思樂 150-43-A-18歲(6000) 信德高中 秀秀 156-45-C-18歲(6000) #台中推薦(高中生) 清水高中 曉艾 153-38-A-18歲(5500) 東山高中 朱迪 160-42-A-18歲(5000) 弘文高中 米娜 157-46-D-18歲(6000) 長億高中 西施 150-

21 Jul 2026, 12:57 UTC164 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔈夢夢推薦 NT$ 6000 👧 汐汐 162cm D+奶 23歲 46kg 📍#夢夢雙北新竹推薦 深吻全身、面對面騎乘、粉足服務、甜蜜中出 一句話: 哥哥…然然的騷逼已經濕成河了,快讓我面對面騎你狂扭腰,扭到你把熱精全部射滿我子宮~ 💝一天3位名額 🍑全台喝茶班表: @Lnana0909 🍑北中南班表 :@xr956 📱LINE:mcmc88 📱LINE:621158 ⭐ Gleezy 搜mcmc88 📱TG: @mm0902 📱TG: @LINE621158 📱TG: @yy5233 📱論壇 www.alice8833.com ✔️一鍵加入性福樂園🍑⬇️ https://t.me/addlist/ADJkF2PPZQxjYTM1

21 Jul 2026, 12:55 UTC162 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔈夢夢推薦 NT$ 8000 👧 Coco 166cm E奶 28歲 47kg 📍#夢夢高雄台南推薦 性感火辣 騷到極點 膚白皙光滑有體香 穴緊 水超多 敏感 叫聲淫蕩 柔軟度又好 玩得很開 💝一天3位名額 🍑全台喝茶班表: @Lnana0909 🍑北中南班表 :@xr956 📱LINE:mcmc88 📱LINE:621158 ⭐ Gleezy 搜mcmc88 📱TG: @mm0902 📱TG: @LINE621158 📱TG: @yy5233 📱論壇 www.alice8833.com ✔️一鍵加入性福樂園🍑⬇️ https://t.me/addlist/ADJkF2PPZQxjYTM1

21 Jul 2026, 12:54 UTC85 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔈夢夢推薦 NT$ 6000 👧 小韻 166cm D奶 23歲 46kg 📍#夢夢台中烏日推薦 甜美氣質上班族,笑起來很有親和力,聊天不尷尬。互動溫柔主動,會觀察對方需求,整體偏女友感路線,陪伴感很足。 💝一天3位名額 🍑全台喝茶班表: @Lnana0909 🍑北中南班表 :@xr956 📱LINE:mcmc88 📱LINE:621158 ⭐ Gleezy 搜mcmc88 📱TG: @mm0902 📱TG: @LINE621158 📱TG: @yy5233 📱論壇 www.alice8833.com ✔️一鍵加入性福樂園🍑⬇️ https://t.me/addlist/ADJkF2PPZQxjYTM1

21 Jul 2026, 12:53 UTC162 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔈夢夢推薦 NT$ 6000 👧 心漫 162cm E奶 22歲 46kg 📍#夢夢雙北新竹推薦 俏皮小女友 爆乳手感好 前凸後翹 床上主動熱情 可無套 69 舔蛋 深情騎乘 💝一天3位名額 🍑全台喝茶班表: @Lnana0909 🍑北中南班表 :@xr956 📱LINE:mcmc88 📱LINE:621158 ⭐ Gleezy 搜mcmc88 📱TG: @mm0902 📱TG: @LINE621158 📱TG: @yy5233 📱論壇 www.alice8833.com ✔️一鍵加入性福樂園🍑⬇️ https://t.me/addlist/ADJkF2PPZQxjYTM1

1

21 Jul 2026, 12:52 UTC133 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔈夢夢推薦 NT$ 8000 👧 樂思 163cm D奶 19歲 45kg 📍#夢夢高雄台南推薦 白皙肌膚笑容可愛 讓人一見就心動 床上表現乖巧聽話 帶來超新鮮的舒服快感~ 💝一天2位名額 🍑全台喝茶班表: @Lnana0909 🍑北中南班表 :@xr956 📱LINE:mcmc88 📱LINE:621158 ⭐ Gleezy 搜mcmc88 📱TG: @mm0902 📱TG: @LINE621158 📱TG: @yy5233 📱論壇 www.alice8833.com ✔️一鍵加入性福樂園🍑⬇️ https://t.me/addlist/ADJkF2PPZQxjYTM1

21 Jul 2026, 12:51 UTC129 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔈夢夢推薦 NT$ 6000 👧 思悅 163cm E奶 22歲 46kg 📍#夢夢台中烏日推薦 奶子超好玩 下面緊實又很會吸 服務很熱情 酥胸大奶堅挺柔軟 可品鮑 身材勻稱整體95分 可舌吻 主動豪放 服務全方位 CP值超高~ 💝一天3位名額 🍑全台喝茶班表: @Lnana0909 🍑北中南班表 :@xr956 📱LINE:mcmc88 📱LINE:621158 ⭐ Gleezy 搜mcmc88 📱TG: @mm0902 📱TG: @LINE621158 📱TG: @yy5233 📱論壇 www.alice8833.com ✔️一鍵加入性福樂園🍑⬇️ https://t.me/addlist/ADJkF2PPZQxjYTM1

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @mm090224. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 656,887 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🇹🇼夢夢台灣中價位茶💰6K-8K賴mcmc88” (@mm090224), 206 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mm090224.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.