Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 台灣喝茶總覽🐳賴🆔mcmc88

Channel

台灣喝茶總覽🐳賴🆔mcmc88

@Lnana0909

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

942subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002217178311
TypeChannel
Username@Lnana0909
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Lnana0909

Growth

942945943.57 August 2026 — 943 subscribers7 August 2026 — 945 subscribers13 August 2026 — 942 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 942–945 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 23:48942-3
7 Aug 2026, 10:27945+2
7 Aug 2026, 00:47943first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 4 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.9%
avg views ÷ 942 subscribers
Avg views / post
103
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held14 (4 March 20266 August 2026)
Views total103
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 00:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 4 March 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 12:15 UTC103 viewsread 7 August 2026

新加入頻道的哥哥們 也歡迎主動來詢問夢夢目前推薦的類型 頻道裡更新的內容 只是夢夢手上的一部分 還有不少優質名單不會全部公開 告訴我你的喜好 預算和需求 夢夢會依照你的條件 幫你推薦更適合的人選❤️ https://t.me/mm0902

1 Jul 2026, 04:34 UTC331 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @xr956

營業中唷~ 沒更新代表在介紹安排妹~ 有需要的哥哥一樣可以來密我唷 https://t.me/mm0902

27 Jun 2026, 04:48 UTC318 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @xr956

Gleezy 外流影片群 強力推薦加入!! 全台最淫最騷外流影片資源,保證看一次硬到底! 全台色爆外流影片總匯 ⭐ https://c.gleezy.top/tRnEsCKb 🔜偷拍真槍實彈 – 酒店偷錄猛幹騷穴 ⭐️ https://c.gleezy.top/0WSyVbEt 🔜 辣妹騷浪外流影片 – 淫娃主動騎乘狂扭水多叫床 ⭐️ https://c.gleezy.top/zViEd6aI 🔜 清純制服被幹到高潮叫床 – 學生妹哭喊著被插到噴水 ⭐️ https://c.gleezy.top/pQSEXFB0 🔜 直接內射狂幹真實畫面 – 無套中出狂射滿穴流精 ⭐️ https://c.gleezy.top/T3DPSCdm 🔜 素人自拍流出專區 – 真實自慰騷逼手指猛扣高潮 ⭐️ https://c.gleezy.top/pM8B1gNr 每日大量更新 • 高清無碼 • 超刺激真實外流 • 安全隱私 想看就看!

1

27 Jun 2026, 04:32 UTC253 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @xr956

Gleezy 備用群組 強力推薦加入❗️❗️ 全台高端外約 一站式資源中心 🔜全台高端外約資源班表 ⭐ https://c.gleezy.top/vcRJVMOl 🔜北部專區 ⭐️ https://c.gleezy.top/sTGxdhhE 🔜中部專區 ⭐️ https://c.gleezy.top/4mydSTAr 🔜 南部專區 ⭐️ https://c.gleezy.top/xy4PmPQX 🔜學生妹專區 ⭐️ https://c.gleezy.top/NqaupPmB 🔜無套專區 ⭐️ https://c.gleezy.top/LUCN0YIA 🔜大奶專區 ⭐️ https://c.gleezy.top/yZIWAyfP 🔜熟女專區 ⭐️ https://c.gleezy.top/bMMBqlUf 🔜素人自拍流出 ⭐️https://c.gleezy.top/tRnEsCKb 每日更新 • 高質感 •

4 Jun 2026, 07:27 UTC415 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @xr956

先前帳號與頻道接連遭到封禁 所有心血一夜化為烏有 無奈只能改名重新開始 以小 M 的身分從頭打拼 不少熟客千辛萬苦找到新帳號 卻因為改名不敢相認 因為之前賬號一直被封實在沒辦法才把名字從夢夢改成小 M 真的很開心你們特地找過來 別懷疑啦 一直都是我唷😆 為了不让大家再認不出我 現在決定改回夢夢啦 一切從頭來過 感謝一路不離不棄 未來也會繼續用心經營~

4 Jun 2026, 07:16 UTC383 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @xr956

之前得簽到群又被炸啦~~~ https://t.me/mm09028 這是小M得新簽到群 歡迎哥哥們加入 加入新簽到群約妹妹立減3000呦~

22 Apr 2026, 09:26 UTC767 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @xr956

https://t.me/tw960 小M福利簽到群 一起來簽到領福利咯~~~

15 Mar 2026, 09:17 UTC≈1,060 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @xr956Photo

最近註冊新TG出現了需付費情況 加上近期不穩定 總是出現問題 以備不時之需 丟失聯繫 已開設𝑮𝒍𝒆𝒆𝒛𝒚頻道請各位加入 ⭐𝑮𝒍𝒆𝒆𝒛𝒚:mcmc88 https://gleezy.net/mcmc88

14 Mar 2026, 11:58 UTC710 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @xr956

換個名字 換個心情✨ 最近頻道被炸得有點誇張 所以決定換個新名字重新開始 之後就改名叫 小M 至於「夢夢」這個名字到底得罪了誰 我也真的不知道o(╥﹏╥)o 頻道跟帳號一直被炸 我平時也沒有去得罪誰 不過沒關係 就當重新開始啦~ 以後請多多關照 小M 💗

14 Mar 2026, 07:53 UTC835 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

天塌了 頻道又被炸了 加夢夢新頻道獲得5000現金券 求求大家一定要加入~~ https://t.me/xr956 https://t.me/xr920

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Lnana0909. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 3,946 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“台灣喝茶總覽🐳賴🆔mcmc88” (@Lnana0909), 942 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lnana0909.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.