Channel
@mkostin_ru
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
18,274subscribers
+128 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001136980189 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mkostin_ru |
| Description | Заявление № 5485850385 Пишу о московских ресторанах с 2003 instagram.com/mkostin_ru Обо мне: t.me/mkostin_ru/644 Оценки: t.me/mkostin_ru/545 Важно: t.me/mkostin_ru/542 Чат @moscow_restaurants Реклама: https://msk.rest/ads Рестораны НЕ рекламирую |
| Created | 28 November 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mkostin_ru |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 18,274 | +71 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 18,203 | -6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 18,209 | +8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 18,201 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 18,200 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:30 | 18,201 | +54 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:11 | 18,147 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:20 | 18,145 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 18,146 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 18,146 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (27 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 106,170 |
| Reactions total | 1,228 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 09:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
1,228 reactions across 11 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 350 | 28.5% | |
| ❤ | 223 | 18.2% | |
| 🤣 | 126 | 10.3% | |
| 👀 | 102 | 8.31% | |
| 😁 | 102 | 8.31% | |
| 😱 | 69 | 5.62% | |
| 🔥 | 68 | 5.54% | |
| 🫡 | 47 | 3.83% | |
| 💔 | 32 | 2.61% | |
| 😢 | 31 | 2.52% | |
| ⚡ | 27 | 2.20% | |
| 🤯 | 14 | 1.14% | |
| 🙈 | 12 | 0.977% | |
| 🤪 | 7 | 0.57% | |
| 🥴 | 5 | 0.407% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 0.244% | |
| 🤮 | 3 | 0.244% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.081% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 0.081% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.081% | |
| 4 further kinds | 4 | 0.326% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,228reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mkostin_ru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
#мысливслух Увы, еще один долгожитель столичного общепита пал. Закрылся ресторан Baan Thai, который был с нами с 2000-го года и который я долгое время считал одним из лучших ресторанов тайской кухни в Москве. Что-то становится прямо-таки «урожайно» на закрытия давних точек общепита. Ох, не к добру это, очень не к добру.
🫡47💔32😢31❤6😁2
#мысливслух Шикарный вид в зале нового @sentimenti_moscow на ул. Льва Толстого)) Прям трон! Ну или намек ))
🤣126❤10👍8😁7👀4
#рецепт В последнее время по разным причинам частенько передвигаюсь по миру через Баку и всегда стараюсь отведать там что-нибудь местное, азербайджанское и вкусное. Уже дома, заглянув в холодильник, увидел банку консервированного щавеля. В голове сразу всплыл традиционный лёгкий летний суп Туршу-сыйыг, напоминающий зелёные щи. Обычно этот суп включает куриный бульон, фрикадельки из куриного фарша, щавель или шпинат…
❤38👍25🔥9
#рецензия Rusty Rat & Pizza – место от молодежи для молодежи, наполненное юношеским беззаботным времяпрепровождением. Меню американское. Еда простая, сытная, без лишних грации и утонченности. В нее трут много сыра, в соусы закладывают много сахара. Если хочется потолкаться у входа и в зале, съесть лишнего и, безусловно, не похудеть, то данное заведение точно подойдет, но если кто-то ищет стопроцентный «Бруклин» в Мос…
👍55❤21🔥3✍1🍌1👏1🤗1
Так, кому мясо японское, заморское, 160 г., всего 73000 ₽ за 386 ккал )) ? Не расходимся, занимаем очередь, потому что в недрах своего облака и сайта я откопал меню @megumi_moscow от 2019-го года (более ранние версии показывать не буду, станет совсем грустно), тенденция очевидна, брать надо сейчас )) (Ну и понятное дело, рецензия уже скоро)
😁39⚡27👀9❤7🤪7
#мысливслух А обещали хрен)) На фото «Студень из бычьих хвостов с хреном» от нового ресторана Рубель (ударение на «е») за 810₽ в меню и 850₽ в чеке. Ох уж эта инфляция. Кстати, борщ тоже вышел дороже, в меню 780₽, у меня 850₽, а еще котлета (880₽ vs 950₽) и морской гребешок (1680₽ vs 1750₽). (Рецензия уже близко )) )
👀89🔥42❤13😁12🙈12👍3🤯3🌚1
#рецензия Нюанс в «Нюансе» заключается в том, что он пролетел или не долетел до самого определения термина – «Нюанс — едва уловимое различие, тонкий оттенок, мелкая подробность или переход в чем-либо (в цвете, звуке, смысле или значении)». Тонкости и едва уловимого различия с другими заведениями столицы не вышло, вместо этого есть приятный двор, скорее всего веселые вечера для молодежи, лаконичное меню и слабая, даже…
👍62❤18💯1
#грустнаяеда Еда сегодня даже не грустная, а пугающая. )) Из всего мирового фастфуда у меня есть три греха. И да, я знаю, как к этим заведениям относится большая часть общественности. Итак, мои три греха — Taco Bell, Long John Silver’s и Arby’s. Каждый раз, когда оказываюсь где-то рядом, обязательно заглядываю. Но точку Arby’s в Стамбульском аэропорту пришлось исключить: я даже не решился попробовать то, что скрыв…
😱66😁29❤7👍5🥴5🤮3
#рецепт Фо Бо: • 2 кг говяжьих рёбер • 1 ст. л. соли • 2 ст. л. сахара • 2 лука • 3–4 ломтика имбиря • 3–4 звёзды бадьяна • 1 палочка корицы • кардамон (семена) • 3–4 ст. л. рыбного соуса Для подачи: • 1 упаковка рисовой лапши • говядина • много зелёного лука Бульон: 1. В кастрюлю с кипящей водой опускаем говяжьи кости и мясо (у меня — рёбра) и варим 10 мин. 2. Сливаем воду, промываем кости и мясо, с…
👍92❤24🔥11✍2🗿1
#рецензия «Мягко открыться» — людей насмешить, иначе и не описать данный визит. Возможно, в северной столице Joli — заведение достойное и внимания, и денег, но то, что сейчас работает в официальной столице, ничего, кроме слёз, не вызывает, при этом восторга вокруг много. Понятно, что мне, как обычно, не повезло, но деньги взяли, еду приготовили, а она откровенно слабая. Может, стоило бы не мягко (soft) открываться, а…
👍67❤28😁12🤯11
#грустнаяеда Позор пришел откуда не ждал, из ANAN by Co Chin Chin в Цюрихе, где за большие деньги мне вместо обычного супа Фо Бо выдали что-то коричневое и оранжевое, плюс мясо из морозилки, зелень и лапшу, уваренную в труху, и без всякого сознания или понимания Вьетнама. Что ж, я погрустил денек, а потом сделал свой обычной простой ханойский фо бо) Рецепт скоро ) и да, бульон для Фо должен быть прозрачным))
❤51👍33🔥3😱3😁1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @mkostin_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 12,123 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Михаил Костин” (@mkostin_ru), 18,274 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mkostin_ru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.