Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Мишанина

@mishaninaaaa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

409subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002784579952
TypeChannel
Username@mishaninaaaa
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mishaninaaaa

Growth

4096 Aug 2026, 23:18 — 409 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 23:24 — 409 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 23:187 Aug 2026, 23:24
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 408–410 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 23:24409no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:18409first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 27 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
85.3%
avg views ÷ 409 subscribers
Avg views / post
349
1 post measured
Reaction rate
10.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 6 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held6 (27 June 202622 July 2026)
Views total349
Reactions total35
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 23:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

313 reactions across 6 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥17656.2%
😁4012.8%
🤯3812.1%
custom 5449860787596186576165.11%
custom 5402483505865171290154.79%
😈103.19%
👍82.56%
🐳51.60%
custom 519738531410399258020.639%
💩20.639%
🏆10.319%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 313reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Jul 2026, 15:02 UTC349 views35 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Мы тут кстати приехали с компанией в шато в Мюнхене. Тут рядом есть озеро, много вкусной еды, интересных людей из разных офисов Teza. Забавно, что выбрали именно Мюнхен

🔥34👍1

2 Jul 2026, 08:03 UTC822 views41 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Москва Хочу ещё немного рассказать про поездку в Москву. Поездка длилась 3 дня, получилась очень насыщенной. 24 июня Прилетел ночью, семья устроила мне сюрприз и встретила в аэропорту. Утром и вечером праздновали день рождения брата и заодно заранее отметили мой день рождения. Ещё сгоняли с братом по магазинам, купили ему бомбер и кепку, теперь он модный. 25 июня Утром пошёл проводить собеседования в ШАД по математ

🔥40🏆1

1 Jul 2026, 08:10 UTC621 views53 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

У меня теперь есть любимая фотография с выпуска

😁39🔥14

29 Jun 2026, 22:20 UTC626 views38 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Женева После защиты диплома заскочил в Швейцарию, приехал в Женеву. Попал сюда как раз на свой день рождения 28 июня. Тут много красивых домов с офигительными подъездами, озеро Leman с прикольным фонтаном, вкусный шоколад. Рядом находится CERN(это там где большой адронный коллайдер, например), съездил туда на экскурсию. Чтобы посмотреть на сами эксперименты типо коллайдера или CMS, нужно бронить экскурсию заранее,

🔥31👍5💩2

27 Jun 2026, 18:34 UTC697 views61 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Чет мне сейчас почти плохо стало. Подхожу сдавать багаж - девушка спрашивает паспорт, смотрит на мою немецкую визу и спрашивает есть ли у меня немецкий внж. Я говорю что пока нет, а она говорит, что по визе через Брюссель нельзя лететь. Я чет стою минуту, офигеваю от жизни, прокручиваю в голове диалог с gpt, который подтвердил что через Брюссель лететь можно. Потом она пошла советоваться с коллегами, все-таки выясн

🤯38custom 540248350586517129015🐳5custom 51973853141039925802😁1

27 Jun 2026, 12:27 UTC698 views85 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Я теперь магистр! Защитил вчера диплом на Физтехе на кафедре Российского Квантового Центра. За магистратуру успел сделать постер на конференцию ICQT 2025, поучаствовать в двух статьях от лаборатории. Обе уже лежат на arXiv, одну отправили в ЖЭТФ, другую в Physical Review Applied. Ждем their honest opinion. Забавно, что защиту магистратуры отмечали перед защитой, а не после - собрались с коллегами по лаборатории в б

🔥57custom 544986078759618657616😈10👍2

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @mishaninaaaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 446,066 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мишанина” (@mishaninaaaa), 409 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mishaninaaaa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.