4 measurements spanning 9 days, net +84. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 347–457 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 15:12
444
+83
7 Aug 2026, 02:52
361
+1
6 Aug 2026, 21:03
360
no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:43
360
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
88.4%
avg views ÷ 444 subscribers
Avg views / post
392
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026
Posts held
20 (11 July 2026 – 25 July 2026)
Views total
1,177
Reactions total
76
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 21:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
295 reactions across 19 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
295
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 295reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
حياكم الله جميعا
نعلن عن إطلاق مجموعة "الرفيق القرآني" لمن يبحث عن رفيق يعينه على الحفظ، ولمن لا يجد من يسمع عليه.
رابط مجموعة الذكور:
https://t.me/Al_Rafeeq_Al_Qurani
رابط مجموعة الإناث:
المجموعة تقوم عليها أخت متقنة لأحكام التجويد.
ملاحظة1: أي شاب يرسل طلب انضمام سيفضح.
ملاحظة2: يشترط عند الدخول تسجيل رسالة صوتية تقسم الأخت فيها بالله العظيم وتشهده على كونها أنثى وألا تري المجمو…
ويا أيها السالكون دروب النور، والراغبون في تجارة لن تبور:
إذا انطلقت ركائبكم في هذا المسير، ولاحت لكم تباشير الفتح والتيسير، فلا تحرمونا طيب البشائر، ولا تطووا عنا أخبار المآثر.
وافونا -رعاكم الله- بما يسَّر المولى لكم من قطاف الثمار، وأتحفونا بما بلغتم في سلم الحفظ من جليل المقدار، فإن في إعلان التوفيق شحذا للعزائم الفواتر، وإيقاظا للهمم السواتر.
وما يثلج صدورنا، ويقر عيوننا، شيء كرؤية بذور هذه الطريقة وقد أينعت ف…
كلمة ختامية نسيت نشرها:
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
الحمد لله الذي أنزل على عبده الكتاب ولم يجعل له عوجا، والصلاة والسلام على من كان خُلقه القرآن، فأنارَ به القلوب والمُهَجَ، وعلى آله وصحبه ومن سلك طريقهم ونَهَجَ.
أما بعد، أيها السادة الأخيار، والإخوة الأبرار:
فها نحن بلغنا مسك الختام في بيان طريقتنا لحفظ كتابِ الله عز وجل، راجياً أن تكون للمُشمِّرِ دليلاً، وللسالك سبيلاً.
واعلموا -رعاكم الله- أنَّ حفظ هذا الذِّكرِ الح…
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
الحمد لله الذي أنزل الكتاب نورًا وبصيرة، وجعله للقلوب حياةً وللأرواح ذخيرة.
أما بعد؛
فإن أعظم ما تُصرف فيه الأعمار، وتقطع لأجله الفيافي والقفار؛ ملازمةُ كلام الواحد القهار.
فهو حبل الله المتين، والذكر المبين، مَن حفظه فقد استدرج النبوة بين جنبيه، ومَن تلاه أقبلت الخيرات إليه.
يقول الحق جل جلاله:
﴿بَلْ هُوَ آيَاتٌ بَيِّنَاتٌ فِي صُدُورِ الَّذِينَ أُوتُوا الْعِ…
هامش المصادر:
تقوم هذه الطريقة على أسس علمية ومعرفية ونفسية وتربوية وسلوكية صحيحة.
النظريات العلمية والمعرفية والنفسية والتربوية والسلوكية المستعملة في طريقة «مرقاة الحفاظ»:
1- نظرية العبء المعرفي (Cognitive Load Theory).
2- نظرية معالجة المعلومات (Information Processing Theory).
3- مبدأ التشفير الحسي المتعدد (Multisensory Encoding).
4- نظرية التعلم الضمني (Implicit Learning).
5- النظرية البنائية (Constructivism)…
مرحلة ما بعد الختم
هذه المرحلة الثمرة الحقيقية لكل الجهد السابق؛ فعملية الحفظ المبدئي انتهت في هذه المرحلة، ولكن تعاهد القرآن رحلة لا تنتهي، فتمتد طيلة العمر، عملا بوصية سيدنا وحبيبنا أبو القاسم:
عن أبي موسى الأشعري رضي الله عنه، عن النبي ﷺ قال: «تَعَاهَدُوا القُرْآنَ، فَوَالَّذِي نَفْسِي بِيَدِهِ لَهُوَ أَشَدُّ تَفَلُّتًا مِنَ الإِبِلِ فِي عُقُلِهَا».
إليك خطوات يسيرة تضمن بها تعاهد القرآن الكريم والمحافظة علي…
حالة الطوارئ:
جعلتها على شكل سؤال وجواب.
س- ماذا لو توقفت عن التكرار بعد إنجاز ٦٠ قراءة -مثلا- بسبب ظرف طارئ؟
أكمل من القراءة رقم ٦١ في اليوم التالي أو حين زوال الظرف، ولا تعد إلى نقطة الصفر أبداً؛ أترى لو أنك بنيت بناء ولم تكمله إن رجعت إليه هل تهدمه أو تكمل ما بقي منه؟
وحاول ألا تقطع الحبل بينك وبين كتاب الله ولو عنى ذلك أن تحافظ على أقل القليل بأن تقرأ المقدار الذي حددته مرة واحدة فقط.
س- ماذا لو أصبت بمرض مفا…
❤9
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mirqatalhufaz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
هل ستستعمل طريقة مرقاة الحفاظ لتحفظ بها؟ سواء كنت طالبا أو معلما أخبرنا بذلك.
نعم (طالب)84%
نعم (معلم)12%
لا4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 25 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 147,746 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مرقاة الحفاظ” (@mirqatalhufaz), 444 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mirqatalhufaz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.