Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

میراث خبر

@miraskhabar

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

414subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001157489805
TypeChannel
Username@miraskhabar
Created29 January 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/miraskhabar

Growth

413414413.56 August 2026 — 414 subscribers6 August 2026 — 414 subscribers6 August 2026 — 413 subscribers14 August 2026 — 414 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 9 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 413–414 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 20:36414+1
6 Aug 2026, 23:51413-1
6 Aug 2026, 19:32414no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:29414first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 14 May 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

30 Jun 2024, 11:22 UTC≈1,960 viewsread 6 August 2026

دکتر نگهبان مخالف برگزاری جشن های 2500 ساله بود/ دادستانی مرودشت باید وارد عمل شود! 👈«وقتی بحث برگزاری جشن‌های 2500 ساله در تخت‌جمشید بود، مرحوم دکتر نگهبان به واسطه مخالفت‌هایش با برگزاری این جشن در آن محوطه مهم و باستانی چندین‌بار به ساواک احضار شد تا توضیح دهد چرا با برگزاری جشن‌ها مخالف است؛ اما در آن زمان کسی حاضر نبود باور کند تنها دلیل این مخالفت‌ها «جان نداشتن» سنگ‌های دو هزار و 500 ساله تخت‌جمشید است» 🔸به

30 Jun 2024, 11:22 UTC≈2,220 viewsread 6 August 2026

🔻در برخی اظهارنظرها به برگزاری کنسرت در آکروپولیس یونان اشاره شده که به نظر من این هم یک مقایسه بلاوجه است. اولا آکروپولیس به میزان تخت‌جمشید آسیب ندیده، از سوی دیگر اقدامات حفاظتی مستمر و سالانه در آن مجموعه بسیار بالاست و ده‌ها سال است که صدها مرمت‌گر در آنجا مشغول فعالیت هستند. معابر با روکش و حفاظ پوشیده شده‌اند. 🔻به هر روی، چنانچه مقرر باشد اینگونه برنامه‌ها با برنامه قبلی در مجاورت تخت‌جمشید یا پاسارگاد برگزار

24 Jun 2024, 16:59 UTC≈2,250 viewsread 6 August 2026

انتخابات در فقدان وعده‌هاي حفاظت از ميراث ‌فرهنگي نامزدها «كوه ‌نور» ايران را نديدند ✍فاطمه علي اصغر ⭕️اين يك هشدار است. هشدار براي فضاي انتخاباتي يك ملت 7 هزارساله. انتخاباتي كه رنگ و بويي از اين ملت در درازاي تاريخ ندارد. 🔻هر چند هويت ملي همواره در بزنگاه‌هاي سياسي اين مملكت مفهوم پيدا كرده است اما مصاديق عيني‌اش كه مي‌شوند؛ «ميراث‌فرهنگي» نشان داده براي نامزدهاي محترم رياست‌جمهوري پيشيزي ارزش ندارد. 🔻 اين ناد

20 Jun 2024, 19:44 UTC≈2,110 viewsread 6 August 2026

☝️ همانطور که در ویدیو بالا می‌بینید، روز گذشته دَرِ چوبی گرمابه ثبت ملی «جنت» در اهواز آتش گرفت، شاید پای دلالان بناهای تاریخی در میان باشد ✍مجتبی گهستونی 👈ساعت یک بامداد پنجشنبه 31 خرداد 1402 دَرِ چوبی گرمابه ثبت ملی جنت اهواز در آتش سوخت و بیم آن می‌رود که پای دلالان بناهای تاریخی که به جان خانه‌های بافت تاریخی اهواز افتاده‌اند در میان باشد. در صورتی که هرچه سریعتر دَرِ چوبی گرمابه ثبت ملی جنت اهواز ترمیم نشود و

11 Jun 2024, 08:45 UTC573 viewsread 6 August 2026

https://donya-e-eqtesad.com/%D8%A8%D8%AE%D8%B4-%D8%AE%D8%A8%D8%B1-64/4077125-%D8%AC%D9%86%D8%AC%D8%A7%D9%84-%D8%A2%D9%84%D8%A8%D9%88%D9%85-%D9%87%D8%A7%DB%8C-%D9%82%D8%A8%D9%84%D9%87-%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85

5 Jun 2024, 18:40 UTC≈1,050 viewsread 6 August 2026

🔴چگاسفلا سند پسکرانه‌های دریای پارس 🔸چگاسفلا الگوی زیستگاهی و سند روشنی است از توجه به کرانه‌ها و پسکرانه‌های شمالی دریای پارس از هزاره‌ی پنجم پ.م، با این حال بی‌مهری‌های اخیر به این محوطه تمامی ندارد. آخرین مشاهدات این سوال را تداعی می‌کند، چرا باید سندهای دریای پارس را بگذاریم نابود شود؟ 👈عباس مقدم، کاوشگر محوطه‌ ی چگاسفلا می‌گوید: «چگاسفلا، الگویی تمام عیار از پیشینة مذهبی، فرهنگی، سیاسی و اقتصادی دوگانه‌ی شوشا

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @miraskhabar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 764,101 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“میراث خبر” (@miraskhabar), 414 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/miraskhabar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.