Валентина Когут - писательница, блогер ютюб, эзотерический следователь.
На этом канале дополнительные разгадки и личные наблюдения.
Номер Роскомнадзор № 4778513929
Created
Between 1 August 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 63 days, net -190. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,441–21,688 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Oct 2026, 00:37
21,469
-12
4 Oct 2026, 15:19
21,481
-29
26 Sept 2026, 07:39
21,510
-19
19 Sept 2026, 08:59
21,529
-2
16 Sept 2026, 19:58
21,531
-8
14 Sept 2026, 19:39
21,539
-5
13 Sept 2026, 05:40
21,544
-5
11 Sept 2026, 07:59
21,549
-5
8 Sept 2026, 14:17
21,554
-7
5 Sept 2026, 10:15
21,561
-6
3 Sept 2026, 13:58
21,567
-3
2 Sept 2026, 08:13
21,570
-1
31 Aug 2026, 10:25
21,571
-5
30 Aug 2026, 09:36
21,576
-1
29 Aug 2026, 09:18
21,577
-4
28 Aug 2026, 06:03
21,581
-4
26 Aug 2026, 06:16
21,585
+1
25 Aug 2026, 05:47
21,584
-5
24 Aug 2026, 06:07
21,589
-6
22 Aug 2026, 14:46
21,595
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
153
Videos
482
Links
768
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1h 15m
Average length
6m 15s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
37,422 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
17,134
45.8%
👍
9,017
24.1%
💯
5,336
14.3%
🥰
3,391
9.06%
😱
1,068
2.85%
🔥
881
2.35%
🤔
543
1.45%
😍
52
0.139%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37,422 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2025 to 24 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Больше не Блогер
❌🎦❌🎦❌🎦
Друзья, вчера 23.05.2025 прошло финальное заседание суда, по результатам которого меня объявили виновной и назначили:
1. Условный срок на 2 года
2. Запрет вести деятельность на 2 года.
В связи с чем я больше не могу вести ни один свой канал и выкладывать на них какую-либо информацию в течение двух лет.
При этом доступ в интернет мне разрешён и общаться с вами в личных сообщениях я пока могу.…
Реакция Оператора
😠🎦😠🎦😠🎦
Вы уже знаете, что я сейчас нахожусь в процессе судебных заседаний по заведённому на меня уголовному делу. И на одно из судебных заседаний суд вызвал для опроса моего оператора.
Ему задавали вопросы прокурор и судья.
И на мой взгляд всё прошло спокойно, уважительно и корректно. Но после заседания я неожиданно обнаружила, что мой оператор очень возмущён.
После расспросов, что именно его так вы…
Как Оно Начиналось
📑🎦 📑🎦 📑🎦
Продолжаю делиться деталями из своей полицтории.
А именно, с чего начинало фабриковаться моё уголовное дело.
Я думала, что всё началось с лингвистической экспертизы, но нет.
Оказалось, что всё началось с понятых и свидетелей моего «преступления».
Вот именно о них, а вернее об их свидетельских показаниях я сегодня и хочу вам рассказать.
Если найдете время и посмотрите всё видео (38 минут), …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mir_kogut. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Путь к себе 🔆 Алхимия Феникса 🔥 @pytksebecherezlubov · 282 (as read 23 September 2026)#80
Биорезонансные приборы и устроства Самодиагностика @liferezonans · 992 (as read 23 September 2026)#81
NeuroFinance | Family Office @finance_gerasimov · 592 (as read 23 September 2026)#82
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Анна Ефремова | экстрасенс @EfremovaAnna · 28,796 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 9 September 2026
Tirtha Relax @TirthaRelax · 49,055 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 September 2026
Мій Світ @mii_svit · 38,884 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мир Валентины Ко́гут” (@mir_kogut), 21,469 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mir_kogut.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
