Channel
@mindgement
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,669subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001955185718 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mindgement |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mindgement |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 1,669 | -3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 1,672 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 1,676 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:18 | 1,677 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:30 | 1,677 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 17 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
128 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 73 | 57.0% | |
| 🔥 | 26 | 20.3% | |
| 👍 | 21 | 16.4% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 2.34% | |
| 🤗 | 3 | 2.34% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 1.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 17 December 2025 to 30 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Внутренний ребёнок и внутренний начальник: кто внутри вами управляет? Это не метафора. Это реальный конфликт, который определяет качество вашей жизни. Внутри каждого из нас живет два голоса Внутренний ребёнок — хочет удовольствия, свободы, интереса. Он — источник интуиции, креатива и «чуйки». Его не слышать опасно: он всё равно пробьётся, но в виде кризиса, апатии или безрассудных поступков. Внутренний начальник …
❤3
Занятие для возвращения себя в норму перед экзаменом или любым значимым событием (собеседованием, публичным выступлением и т.д.): В максе: https://max.ru/id490701123104_biz/AZ5JdNzzeWE В вк: https://vk.ru/wall-184342557_32304
МДЖ нужен отдельный канал в МАХ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Антикризисное управление для стартапов: как собрать сильную команду #бубнитоля Меня позвали в диалог, а я и не отказалась. Значит, пора не только работать, но и говорить вслух о том, что за эти годы наболело, наработалось и не раз спасало проекты от бодрого полёта в стену. За 20+ лет в маркетинге наблюдались зрелые бизнесы, странные собственники, прекрасные идеи, которые взлетали, и не менее прекрасные идеи, кото…
👍6
Video message, posted without a caption
❤5
Сегодня меня чуть было не завербовали в трудоголический ад.👀 Но сначала, коль уж так совпало: всех дам поздравляю с Восьмым марта! На связи Таня. Короче, сегодня утром встретилась со своей коллегой. Мы вместе проходили обучение по работе с участниками СВО и семьями – она психолог в местной психушке, а я, как вы понимаете, безработная мать-одиночка вполне профпригодная психологиня. И она такая: – Тань, а у тебя е…
❤12
Собрать команду, которая не развалится в кризис. Это вообще реально? У меня тут недавно дилемма. С одной стороны, насмотрелась на стартапы, где люди уходят пачками, потому что "потеряли смысл" (спойлер: они его и не находили, просто денег мало). С другой стороны, есть команды, которые в полном швахе вдруг собираются плотнее и вывозят то, чего не могли и не должны были вывозить по всем раскладам. И я думаю: а чё так…
❤5🔥3🤔2
Channel name was changed to «МДЖ•работай с головой»
С завтрашнего дня мы переименуем канал. Несмотря на то, что слова MINDGEMENT в принципе нигде особенно нет и мы его слепили из двух: MIND и МЕНЕДЖМЕНТ Зато, у нас есть достойная альтернатива✔️ МДЖ•работай с головой P.S. Как-то так повелось, что между собой мы пишем МДЖ. Так удобнее. Теперь вы знаете, что это значит, не запутаетесь🕒
❤7👍6
✔️ Что общего в профориентации детей и взрослых? И чем они принципиально отличаются. ✔️Когда и с чего её нужно начинать? Практические шаги для разных возрастов. ✔️ Как связаны возрастные и профессиональные кризисы? Почему они наступают и как их проходить осознанно. ✔️ Много интересных фактов о поиске своего места в жизни — то, о чём редко говорят открыто. ТГ-канал Татьяны Пушковой ТГ-канал Алены Гарус https://rutub…
🔥3❤1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤1
Моя подруга-психолог пишет для души. А в этот раз актуально для трудоголиков, делюсь🤝
🔥20
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @mindgement. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
МДЖ нужен отдельный канал в МАХ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 17 December 2025 to 30 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 866,352 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“МДЖ•работай с головой” (@mindgement), 1,669 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mindgement.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.