Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝐂ici’s 𝐏ayment

@miinta

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001283542424
TypeChannel
Username@miinta
Created13 December 2021measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/miinta

Growth

510 August 2026 — 5 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5 subscribers10 August 202613 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4–6 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 03:485no change
10 Aug 2026, 21:175first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 13 December 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

167 reactions across 5 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 61141405729921467964828.7%
custom 61164459954725218753219.2%
custom 6114086598138137460127.19%
custom 6113934710914681973105.99%
custom 543141326740470108774.19%
custom 511627520890634342963.59%
custom 543169002221235636863.59%
custom 543148182796764961452.99%
custom 543157328929621885952.99%
custom 584592950326355999452.99%
custom 584613056356759079052.99%
custom 584620506836527144052.99%
custom 584800266250250266352.99%
custom 543134497312972732442.40%
custom 543183685425930265642.40%
custom 611382974620893532642.40%
custom 611386715537408268842.40%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 167reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 13 December 2021 to 20 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Jun 2024, 13:06 UTC≈1,470 views36 reactionsread 13 August 2026

ㅤ 🪧 GUIDE MAP 🪧 🖱️ regulation 🖱️ spay, gopay, ovo, seabank, pulsa, dll 🖱️ khusus dana ㅤ

custom 54314132674047010877custom 54316900222123563686custom 54314818279676496145custom 54315732892962188595custom 61141405729921467965custom 54313449731297273244custom 54318368542593026564

27 Sept 2023, 01:40 UTC≈1,500 views35 reactionsread 13 August 2026

ㅤ ╰꯱ YOUR SECOND CLASS. Niscellaneous classes have retained an increase; it has become a thread that’s attached to all buyers who are sojourning. The encased poem’s verses are always diverse but have identical aspirations. That’s my prominent sentence. { ”Absorbed from various strings of poetry found out there: QRIS enrolled it there.” } | ... ⌗. QRIS diatas hanya dapat di scan pada aplikasi DANA saja, karena adany

custom 611414057299214679619custom 611644599547252187516

5 Sept 2023, 14:29 UTC≈1,460 views46 reactionsread 13 August 2026

ㅤ ╰꯱ YOUR FIRST CLASS. With the demeanor of a channel that aims to exhibit your poetry readings, it is wonderful if you purely forecast the essence of your newsletter. It’s only a dream for you. ㅤI. QRIS. ❘ Located upwards, ❘ in the name of Studdio x Bellanja ㅤII. SEABANK. ❘ 901366491706 ❘ in the name of K** G** ㅤIII. PULSA. ❘ 082394893767 ❘ telkomsel ❘ rate : mengikuti ra

custom 611644599547252187516custom 611408659813813746012custom 611393471091468197310custom 61138297462089353264custom 61138671553740826884

13 Dec 2021, 13:40 UTC≈1,130 views26 reactionsread 13 August 2026

ㅤ ۩ .. Regulations! This is a spreadsheet from the firestorms in my regulations that retains the information to be discussed in my continent residence. ㅤ── · · The unspecified thing that’s avowed indicates which is truly written for my public channel and for anyone who reads it: ۩ .. Adanya peraturan yang berlaku untuk ditaati dan dipahami dalam waktu yang singkat, itu bertujuan agar menjadikan seseorang lebih t

custom 51162752089063434296custom 58459295032635599945custom 58461305635675907905custom 58462050683652714405custom 58480026625025026635

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @miinta. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 439,444 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐂ici’s 𝐏ayment” (@miinta), 5 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/miinta.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.