Channel
@eempire
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
37subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001515937440 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @cirelyn @diilraba @eempire @joames |
| Created | 3 March 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/eempire |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 37 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 37 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 37 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 37 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 3 March 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
784 reactions across 5 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5785313534598451184 | 113 | 14.4% | |
| custom 6116021468020083234 | 84 | 10.7% | |
| custom 6142956848610805231 | 79 | 10.1% | |
| custom 5424646370336195781 | 78 | 9.95% | |
| custom 6167776120289626230 | 78 | 9.95% | |
| custom 5371101867755446871 | 76 | 9.69% | |
| custom 6334835539056789480 | 74 | 9.44% | |
| custom 6059969842704812136 | 69 | 8.80% | |
| custom 6133927070712989939 | 68 | 8.67% | |
| custom 6149731334886525492 | 65 | 8.29% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 784reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 3 March 2022 to 19 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @eempire. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 March 2022 to 19 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ㅤ yang nanya username atau gift lewat anon, ga akan aku balas yaa 😊 langsung chat @jcici atau @jcicibot aja. untuk pricenya bisa cek t.me/studdio/668 dan t.me/upggrade/10, avail nego, book wdp. thanks in advance! ❤️ ㅤ
custom 57853135345984511848custom 61160214680200832347custom 61429568486108052317custom 61677761202896262307custom 63348355390567894807custom 54246463703361957816
Posted without readable text
Channel photo updated
𝐂irelyn 𝐄iree 🂡 pinned «ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤmaaf kalau bot atau segala macamnya gabisa di klik, itu karena akun @bycici aku ter banned, dan semuanya tersimpan dsana 🙏🏻 untuk sementara terima orderan atau apapun melalui…»
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤ ( 𐂗 ) schemes whispers. the purveyor of enigmatic letter-hole is concealed. feel free allocation; mumble you may have, embrace commentary, suggestions, advice or veiled communiqué for our palatinate’s. 𖤝
custom 578531353459845118434custom 537110186775544687124custom 611602146802008323424custom 542464637033619578123custom 613392707071298993923custom 614295684861080523123custom 605996984270481213622custom 633483553905678948022
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤ( 👑 ) poetic • cici's home! 📜 .. I, paper roll unfolded “.. 📒 — allure, owner ” ▸ usern : @jcici ▸ name : cirelyn eiree ▸ numeric : 724981423 ▸ account status : p/ba “.. 📒 — allure, others ” ▸ bot : @jcicibot ▸ clone acc : @bycici (👻) ▸ numeric : 6114138761 (👻) ▸ clone acc : @v…
custom 578531353459845118436custom 537110186775544687123custom 542464637033619578122custom 611602146802008323422custom 614295684861080523122custom 616777612028962623022custom 605996984270481213620custom 614973133488652549220
Sticker, posted without a caption
💜💜💜💜💜 t.me/addemoji/fromcici t.me/addemoji/EmojiJcici t.me/addemoji/adaptive_1 t.me/addemoji/adaptive_2 💜💜💜💜💜💜💜 t.me/addstickers/fromcici2 t.me/addstickers/jualan_cici 💜💜💜💜💜 💜💜💜💜💜💜 t.me/addstickers/fromjcici aku ngga jual emoji premium, yang di atas bebas dipakai kok! kalau butuh rekomendasi seller, coba cek ini: 1. @ebidLe 2. @beaverz 3. @carandle 4. @BLUE_NBHD 5. @PinkiesPromises atau mau request emoji supaya ak…
Channel name was changed to «𝐂irelyn 𝐄iree 🂡»
Channel photo updated
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @eempire. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 136,573 of 1,625,404entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@eempire named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐂irelyn 𝐄iree 🂡” (@eempire), 37 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eempire.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.