дневник заморожен, пока немного не разберусь с учебой, после снова будет активен
🕊2

Channel
@miiichK
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
22subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002569763235 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @miiichK |
| Created | 25 May 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/miiichK |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 22 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:32 | 23 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 23 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 25 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
129 reactions across 8 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🕊 | 31 | 24.0% | |
| ☃ | 26 | 20.2% | |
| custom 5465430911627587323 | 22 | 17.1% | |
| 👀 | 22 | 17.1% | |
| custom 5422646693692736744 | 9 | 6.98% | |
| custom 5416014186150923856 | 6 | 4.65% | |
| custom 5375336598135139331 | 3 | 2.33% | |
| custom 5415963084630031263 | 3 | 2.33% | |
| custom 5197398671452304231 | 2 | 1.55% | |
| custom 5456587917562499140 | 2 | 1.55% | |
| 👻 | 2 | 1.55% | |
| custom 5215495301405624615 | 1 | 0.775% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2025 to 3 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
дневник заморожен, пока немного не разберусь с учебой, после снова будет активен
🕊2
❤️🤩 ⚫️all ⚫️all in ⚫️all 𝖎𝖓 love 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 ⚫️all in ⚫️🤍🔠🤍🌟🤍🤍🔗🤍 🤍🔗 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 ⚫️all 𝖎𝖓 love ⭐⚫️gain 𝐚𝐧𝐝 again ⚫️all 𝖎𝖓 love ⭐⭐⚫️gain 𝐚𝐧𝐝 again ⚫️all 𝖎𝖓 love ⭐⭐⭐⚫️gain 𝐚𝐧𝐝 again ⚫️all 𝖎𝖓 love 🎁🤩🤩🤩⭐⭐⭐🤩🤩 ⚫️gain 𝐚𝐧𝐝 again ⭐⚫️all 𝖎𝖓 love ⚫️gain 𝐚𝐧𝐝 again ⭐⭐⚫️all 𝖎𝖓 love ⚫️gain 𝐚𝐧𝐝 again ⭐⭐⭐⚫️all 𝖎𝖓 love ⚫️gain 𝐚𝐧𝐝 again 🔇🔇🔇
🕊14👀13☃11
💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙 ➿🤩🤩🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ➿🤩🤩 🗡🗡 💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙 🔤ель: создать бинго своего персонажа. 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🔤ринял:: 𝘈𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘢 𝘎𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘯𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘴𝘴 🔤ередаю:: 𝘊𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘦𝘭 𝘙𝘰𝘰𝘬, 𝘋𝘦𝘢𝘯 𝘛𝘩𝘰𝘮𝘢𝘴, 𝘔𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘢 𝘌𝘥𝘨𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘣𝘦, 𝘛𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘏𝘪𝘨𝘨𝘴, 𝘏𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘎𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘳 и остальным коннектам. 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
custom 54654309116275873238custom 54160141861509238566🕊5☃3👀1
🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 🪔🪔🪔 ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 🪔🪔🪔 🌟🪔🪔 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟Симус знает все тайные ходы и укромные уголки Хогвартса не потому, что хотел подслушивать, а потому что ему было просто интересно, куда ведёт эта дверь. 🌟Его лучший друг(Дин) — тот, кто готов держать огнетушитель,пока Симус пробует новое заклинание. Эта дружба проверена дымом и гарью. 💙💙 🌟 Несмотря на свою взрывную натуру, Финниган невероятно предан друзьям. Если ком…
custom 54654309116275873237custom 54226466936927367446☃5🕊4👀2
🔔⚫️🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🍙аконец-то война закончилась. Закончив Хогвартс, наша троица как и мечтала обрести свободу, переехала в дом. Он был на окраине поляны 🌟 возле леса,рядом было небольшое озеро. Дом был двух этажным и довольно большим для нас троих, но нас это устраивало, особенно за такую чудесную цену, что казалось мне подозрительным. Первые несколько дней были просто чудесными:мы осваивались на новой территории, си…
☃6custom 53753365981351393313custom 54159630846300312633custom 54654309116275873233custom 51973986714523042312custom 54226466936927367442custom 52154953014056246151custom 54565879175624991401
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 54565879175624991401
📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏 🍙ружба 🌟 это одно из самых ценных моментов в жизни. Друзья 🌟 это те люди, которые являются твое поддержкой и опорой, те кому ты доверяешь. Друзья словно твоя вторая семья, которая тоже всегда рядом. 🍙имус всегда считал своих друзей второй семьёй, ведь в Хогвартсе он был с ними чуть ли не каждую минуту. Он ценил своих друзей и всегда старался беречь дружбу. 📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️ 🍙равила конне…
🕊4👀3custom 54654309116275873233custom 54226466936927367441
🔮🤩𝐀𝐕𝐈𝐆𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 🤩имус часто проявляет любопытство, особенно к тому, что касается магии. Он не боится экспериментировать, хотя эти эксперименты иногда приводят к комичным или опасным последствиям (например, его попытки создавать взрывные зелья). 🪙Навигация позволит вам узнать, что описанно в данном дневнике 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 #𝐌𝐔𝐒𝐈𝐂 — музыка #𝐇𝐄𝐀𝐃𝐊𝐀𝐍𝐎𝐍𝐒 — хедканоны #𝐓𝐑𝐄𝐍𝐃 — тренд #𝐈𝐍𝐓𝐄𝐑𝐀𝐂𝐓𝐈𝐕𝐄 — интерактив #𝐋𝐎𝐕𝐄 — любовь и чувст…
👀3👻2🕊2☃1custom 54654309116275873231
Channel created
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @miiichK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 421,262 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@miiichK named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Frozen |𝐒. 𝐅𝐢𝐧𝐧𝐢𝐠𝐚𝐧” (@miiichK), 22 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/miiichK.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.