File, posted without a caption

Channel
𝐑𝐎𝐌𝐈𝐋𝐃𝐀 𝐕.
@infooorssx
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002617567872 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @infooorssx |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 3 May 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/infooorssx |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 2 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 2 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 3 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 7
- Videos
- 3
- Links
- 12
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 41s
- Average length
- 14s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
🍒🍒🍒🍒🍒😈😈🤍🤍🤍🤩🤩 😈😈🍒🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🤩🤩 😈𝓡𝐎𝐌𝐈𝐋𝐃𝐀 𝓥𝐀𝐍𝐄 &𝓒𝐀𝐒𝐒𝐈𝐔𝐒 𝓦𝐀𝐑𝐑𝐈𝐍𝐆𝐓𝐎𝐍😈 😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈 — Как вам удалось растопить сердце Кассиуса. Ходят слухи, что начало вашей истории было... не совсем обычным? — О, скрывать уже нет смысла. Я была влюблена в него с четвертого курса, а он меня будто не замечал. И да, я признаюсь: я воспользовалась приворотным зельем. Это было глупо и отчаянно, я просто хотела, чтобы он хотя бы раз посм…
у меня пополнились фавориты в каналах/дневниках, поэтому обновляю папку (сюда вошли даже я хочу и канал по дракодору 🙏🏻🙏🏻) хоть их и много в папке, но за этими дневниками мне правда интересно следить. папка фаворитов у этих дневников самый прекрасный слог. их посты я могу перечитывать вечность. папка дневников с прекрасным слогом.
😻𝗥𝗢𝗠𝗜𝗟𝗗𝗔 𝗩𝗔𝗡𝗘 😻Отдел регулирования магических популяций и контроля над ними. Структурная единица в британском Министерстве магии, подчиняющаяся Отделу регулирования магических популяций и контроля над ними. Расследует инциденты, произошедшие с магическими тварями. В крайних случаях комиссия принимает решение о казни опасного животного, этим занимается палач, состоящий при Министерстве. 😻Куратор по адаптации.…
ОПЯТЬ?... ладно. 1. https://t.me/Druwjo_siskp 2. https://t.me/D_Malfoys 3. https://t.me/ESP7RANZZA 4. https://t.me/r0m1ldaa 5. https://t.me/j1mmy_ph 6. https://t.me/PPark1ns 7. https://t.me/MayaNixHarris 8. https://t.me/VNSTW и дневники обреченной, персефоны, но я их потерял. порядок не имеет значения.
Photo, posted without a caption
📁📁Берегись бланджера! 📏📏📏📏📏🤩📏📏📏📏 Любимые дв? 📏📏📏📏📏🤩📏📏📏📏 🌟: нет таких. они все дебилы. бесят прям.
родную с 30!
не буду писать очень длинный текст, в общем это папка моих фаворитов в сфере. (язва на первом месте должен был быть, ало)
⠀ ⠀⋆ ˖˚ ♡ ˚˖ ⋆ ⠀ ⠀𝘿𝙖𝙥𝙝𝙣𝙚 𝙂𝙧𝙚𝙚𝙣𝙜𝙧𝙖𝙨𝙨 ⠀ ⠀ × ⠀ ⠀𝙍𝙤𝙢𝙞𝙡𝙙𝙖 𝙑𝙖𝙣𝙚 ⠀ ⠀⠀ ⋆ ˖˚ ♡ ˚˖ ⋆ #𝐹𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑠 #𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑡
https://t.me/OBSESO_MILS https://t.me/r0m1ldaa https://t.me/VNSTW https://t.me/CARPADEATH
Моя дорогая Ромильда. Честно сказать, оформление хромает, постов не читал, ибо по-моему было переоформление. На общий формат если смотреть, то оценка 7/10. Прошу прощения за оценку. Не стоит забывать, что это просто мое личное мнение, которое может и не иметь никакого смысла или отношения оскорбить вас. Благодарю за участие!
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @infooorssx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@r0m1ldaa · 228 postsПереоформление #𝐃𝐄𝐀𝐓𝐇| T.M.R.
@CARPADEATH · 971 post𝑰𝑻’𝑺 𝑹𝑶𝑶𝑲
@castielrook · 221 post𝐂𝐎𝐀𝐋 𝐃𝐄𝐀𝐍. #𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐧𝐧𝐢𝐲
@coaldean · 221 post𝑴𝒓. 𝑫𝒆𝒗𝒊𝒍 | 𝑫𝒓𝒂𝒄𝒐 𝑴𝒂𝒍𝒇𝒐𝒚’𝒔 𝒅𝒊𝒂𝒓𝒚🦋
@D_Malfoys · 1121 post𝗔𝗱𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝗠𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗣𝘂𝘀𝗲𝘆
@Druwjo_siskp · 1161 postFrozen |𝐒. 𝐅𝐢𝐧𝐧𝐢𝐠𝐚𝐧
@miiichK · 221 post𝔖𝐻𝐼𝑀𝑀€𝑅𝐼𝑁𝐺 𝐹𝐿𝟏𝑅𝑇𝟏𝑁𝐺
@PPark1ns · 1511 postЗакрыта || 𝘾𝙖𝙡𝙞𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙚 || 𝙂𝙧𝙚𝙚𝙣𝙜𝙧𝙖𝙨𝙨 #Ⲭⲁⲧⲟⲣ
@YourGreengrass · 591 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@infooorssx named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐑𝐎𝐌𝐈𝐋𝐃𝐀 𝐕.” (@infooorssx), 2 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/infooorssx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.