غدًا يوم القيامة حيث لا يشترون أي شيء من الانسان،
فإنهم يشترون الدمعة على سيد الشهداء كحبّة الدُرٍ نقدًا.
#لأجل_المهدي
٢٢ ربيع الأول ١٤٤١ه
للتواصل هُنا:
@abo_baqr
Created
Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
27 measurements spanning 97 days, net -72. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,618–9,836 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 20:37
9,739
+8
7 Nov 2026, 21:58
9,731
-1
4 Nov 2026, 11:55
9,732
-2
1 Nov 2026, 10:14
9,734
+3
29 Oct 2026, 12:46
9,731
-10
26 Oct 2026, 14:20
9,741
-17
23 Oct 2026, 23:09
9,758
-3
21 Oct 2026, 01:28
9,761
+63
18 Oct 2026, 08:26
9,698
-6
15 Oct 2026, 16:06
9,704
-1
12 Oct 2026, 17:39
9,705
+62
5 Oct 2026, 17:38
9,643
-43
28 Sept 2026, 09:35
9,686
-21
18 Sept 2026, 20:17
9,707
-1
14 Sept 2026, 14:41
9,708
-11
10 Sept 2026, 18:42
9,719
-5
5 Sept 2026, 09:58
9,724
-7
1 Sept 2026, 20:33
9,731
-22
29 Aug 2026, 23:28
9,753
-20
24 Aug 2026, 03:46
9,773
first reading
Engagement
266 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.5%
avg views ÷ 9,739 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,510
93 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
93
of 266 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
266 (3 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
140,341
Reactions total
6,260
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 23:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈8,710
Videos
≈2,300
Links
≈1,230
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
26m 50s
Average length
1m 17s
Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
21,167 reactions across 266 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
6,897
32.6%
💔
4,806
22.7%
🤬
2,659
12.6%
❤
1,426
6.74%
🫡
1,379
6.51%
🤣
1,315
6.21%
⚡
635
3.00%
😭
568
2.68%
🙏
560
2.65%
🤯
346
1.63%
🔥
301
1.42%
👏
275
1.30%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 266 of the 266 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21,167 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 266 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 266 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mhdi3i3. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 266 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 11 of 93 posts held from the last 30 days (11.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
حركة النجباء تساند اخوانهم في كتا،ئب حزب الله، بعد الهجمة الخبيثة والممولة ضد الكتا،ئب وقادتها الشجعان.
نسأل الله ان يحفظ مقاومتنا الشريفة من كيد العدو المنافق.
البيئة مؤثرة جدًا، وهذا الواقع محد يگدر ينكر تأثير البيئة من حوله، والبيئة مو شرط بيئة الولادة، كذلك بيئة الاصدقاء والجامعة والوظيفة، مثل ما تشوف تأثيرها على الكثير الكثير من مدعي الوطنية والعلمانية والتحرر، مدحهم وتطبيلهم لشخص كل ما عرف به هو اخلاقه البذيئة في التجاوز على خصومه والتكـ،فير وقطع الرقاب والاعناق والتفـ،جير.
هذا مصداق واقعي حاليًا، لكن بنفس الوقت نشوف تأثير البيئة علينا جميعًا، على الكلمات والملابس وال…
الراية الصفراء المُباركة، ما يمكن المساس بيها، بسبب املاءات العدو المتغطرس الأمريكي، باراك وترامب إلى زوال، وقطعًا الي يتغطى بالمحتل يبقى عريان.
لا تصيروا ادوات بيد العدو، لأن محد يرحمكم، ودائمًا الخائن يكون بمزبلة التاريخ، وتذكروا، أي تعرض أمريكي للمقا،ومة الشريفة، هو تعرض للشعب الحر.
أمريكا تريدكم تتصادمون مع المجا،هدين، والمجا،هد ما يريد شيء غير خروج أمريكا وعدم تدخله بأرضه واستخدام السماء لعدوانه.
بحسب ما وصلنا هناك محاولة لتكرار سيناريو الدخول الفاشل إلى منطقة جرف النداف الذي شهدته المنطقة قبل أشهر ولكن هذه المرة في جرف النصر ومعسكر صقر.
فعلى عقلاء القوم التدخل العاجل والعمل على احتواء الموقف وفضّ الاشتباك قبل أن تتطور الأمور وتصل إلى ما لا يُحمد عقباه .
بعض المرتزقة يحاول يعتبر قضية الفا،طس العلواني قضية طائفية، وهذا نوع من انواع التدليس الخبيثة، الجميع يعرف ما عدنا مشكلة مع ابناء العامة، الدليل فلسطين وقفنا معهم بالدم والمال ضد العدو الصهـ،يوني وضحينا بأعظم ما نملك من قيادة ورموز وكان موقفكم موقف المتفرج والمتشفي من دمائنا ضد الصهـ،اينة.
لكن موقفنا مع العلواني ليس مع مذهبه، بل مع كل اسباب خراب العراق من بداية ٢٠١٢م وصولًا لاحتلال ثلاث محافظات عراقية بيد د١عش ومجزر…
اكثر ما يثير السخرية، هو منشورات القوم عن "شرف الخصومة"، يا أخي اي خصومة هذه؟ رموزنا استشهدوا وهم يواجهون امريكا والكيان الصهـ،يوني وانتم تستهزؤن بيهم ليل نهار، بينما رموزكم النتنة إما في حفرة أو صحيات!.
عجيب، يحاسبني على رد فعلي وهو الطائفي النتن الي سفك دمي وشرع قـ،تلي، اللعـ،نة على مثاليتكم الزئفة يا أوباش..
هالمرتزقة ما يهمهم اي دم شيعي، بقدر ما يهمهم الاقتـ،تال الداخلي، فهو يدعم تشرين والتيار الصدري وجهاز مكافحة الار،هاب بطريقة تدعو للاقتـ،تال الشيعي - الشيعي، بالنهاية تشرين هي من رحم الجنوب الشيعي والتيار الصدري هو عبارة عن شيعة وجهاز مكافحة الار،هاب كذلك يعتبروه شيعة!
وإلا العلواني قـ،تل ابطال ٢ من الجهاز وهم لا يرون قيمة لهؤلاء الشهـ،داء ويرون قيمة للعلواني اعلى منهم وحينما شاب بسيط استهزاء بمقـ،تل العلواني، سب تشر…
هذا النويشط مثلًا صار مدة يدعي "الوطنية" بل وصل يتملق لسيد مقتدى والتيار الصدري ويدعي بأنها مقرب منهم، بس علمود يخلق اقتـ،تال شيعي، هذا النويشط، ليل نهار مجند حساباته ومحتواه لمهاجمة المقا،ومة والجمهورية الإسلامية، بل حتى امس في تجمع صوتي على برنامج X حينما احد الشباب المنتمين لتشرين ضحك على مقـ،تل العلواني، قام هالنويشط بسب تشرين وضحايها اجمع، تجاوزه لو صدر من غيره لانفعلوا "التشارنة" لكن يؤسفني مجاملة..
ثقوا يا اخ…
شعارات وتحريض طائفي خلال سنوات، من قادمون يا بغداد، وقادمون يا طهران، ومليشيات صفوية والجيش الصفوي، الى تهديد بقطع الرؤوس والأعناق والحذر من المد الشيعي وبعدها يتراجع ويقول "الايراني".
نفس الاسلوب الي حاليًا يتداولوا كان يستخدموا سنة ٢٠١٣م وحينما تم اعتقاله، صار المظلوم الثوري المجا،هد وهو وعشيرته من محاربة الجـ،يش صاروا عشتو محاربي الارها،ب وحاليًا بعدما فطس صار الشهـ،يد المغدور!.
هُزلت والله هُزلت، ينظرون علينا ب…
❤41👏8❤🔥1🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 266 posts we hold for @mhdi3i3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@mhdi3i3 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
11 November 2026
Most recent edit
11 November 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
دِفءٌ وآيَات @Miracles_20 · 20,393 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 September 2026
محمد عدنان @hgjghfgj · 25,775 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 September 2026
Ailia Emame @AiliaEmame1185 · 22,596 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 September 2026
مرتضى المدرسي @smortadha · 39,000 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
هالة الجبوري @eng_hala95 · 39,683 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
السّيد محسن المُدَرسي @Mohsen_Modarresi · 33,424 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
قناه وضائف بغداد @BAGHDAD50_2022 · 24,677 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 17 September 2026
خذ لقلبك مايرويه @yamahdimdd3133 · 27,839 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 9 September 2026
الصَّحِيفَة السَّجَّادِيَّة. @imamsajadas · 30,732 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 September 2026
الحسين حكاية حب @b313ali · 26,336 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“حبةُ الدُر” (@mhdi3i3), 9,739 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mhdi3i3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.