Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
26 measurements spanning 96 days, net -1,195. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,628–7,181 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 16:07
5,807
-30
7 Nov 2026, 11:50
5,837
-13
4 Nov 2026, 21:26
5,850
-19
1 Nov 2026, 23:37
5,869
-28
29 Oct 2026, 13:45
5,897
-12
26 Oct 2026, 22:50
5,909
-18
24 Oct 2026, 00:04
5,927
-32
21 Oct 2026, 08:59
5,959
-14
17 Oct 2026, 22:28
5,973
-34
14 Oct 2026, 21:18
6,007
-56
11 Oct 2026, 14:19
6,063
-70
5 Oct 2026, 04:20
6,133
-164
26 Sept 2026, 08:15
6,297
-238
15 Sept 2026, 08:37
6,535
-53
11 Sept 2026, 18:38
6,588
-160
7 Sept 2026, 06:57
6,748
-57
2 Sept 2026, 16:44
6,805
-38
30 Aug 2026, 12:07
6,843
-23
27 Aug 2026, 09:53
6,866
-14
24 Aug 2026, 00:57
6,880
first reading
Engagement
41 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
36.1%
avg views ÷ 5,807 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,100
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 41 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 October 2026
Posts held
41 (9 July 2026 – 17 October 2026)
Views total
6,290
Reactions total
149
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Nov 2026, 15:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 54s
Average length
33s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,641 reactions across 41 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,510
95.0%
👌
50
1.89%
🙏
41
1.55%
🔥
23
0.871%
👍
17
0.644%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,641 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 17 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
العمل بالصحة ما يبرر أبدًا موت العاطفة، التعامل الفوقي من قبل الكادر باتجاه المريض هذه مشكلة، بالنهاية الكادر من الطبيب والممرض والصيدلي وغيره، يقبض راتب شهري لهذه الخدمة، هو عامل يقدم الخدمة للمجتمع، إن كانت ما عاجبته، يتركها ويروح، ألاف غيره يتمنون هذه الوظيفة.
يؤسفني بشدة، حينما اشاهد كوادر صحية تصور بمعاناة المرضى وتجعلها يوميات بحساباتهم دون تفكير بمشاعر المريض وعائلته، هذه قلة الذوق ضروري أن تعالج، باليد والحد…
*عن أمير المؤمنين الإمام علي بن أبي طالب عليه السلام ، عن النبي الأكرم محمد صلى الله عليه وآله ، أنَّه قال في وصيته له : يا عليّ ثمانية إن أُهينوا فلا يلوموا إلّا أنفسهم*
*الذاهب إلى مائدةٍ لم يدع إليها*
*والمتأمّر على ربِّ البيت*
*وطالب الخير مِن أعدائه*
*وطالب الفضل من اللئام*
*والداخل بين اثنين في سرٍّ لهم لم يدخلاه فيه*
*والمستخفُّ بالسلطان*
*والجالس في مجلس ليس له بأهل*
*والمقبل بالحديث على من لا …
انظروا الى الصورة .. مع المها .. الا انها هي الحقيقة للنظام العلماني .. أما شعارات الحرية والتعددية مجرد غطاء مرحلي وصولاً للعلمانية الشاملة التي تعمل على (حذف الدين) من الحياة.
وكما قال صاحبهم الأمريكي حين سئل عن جريمة قتل 168 طفلة في مدرسة ابتدائية في ميناب الايرانية بصاروخين امريكيين: "إنهم قتلوا حتى لا يكبروا في ظلّ نظام يوجِب عليهم فرض "البرقع"! "
هذه هي حقيقة الأنظمة العلمانية.. من دون رتوش! محاربة الدين.. و…
بعيداً عن رأي الدين الاسلامي والمرؤة
خل نحجي بمنطق الربح والخسارة :
نعم، من حق العراق أن يشوف مصلحته الاقتصادية والسياسية .
ولكن هل من مصلحة العراق اقتصادياً وسياسياً أن يكون العصا التي تضرب أمريكا بها خصومها؟
بالمقابل ماذا أخذنا من أمريكا مقابل هذه
التسهيلات لمن خلينا الأرض والأجواء العراقية ممر أساسي في قصف بلد مجاور وقتل المدنين فيه ؟؟ شنو حصلنا من مكاسب مادية؟
زين هو طبيعي إحنه كمسلمين نسمح لأمريكا تقصف من خ…
على طاري السيادة
الخزانة الأميركية تصدر ترخيصاً يسمح للخطوط الجوية العراقية بتسيير رحلات بين العراق وإيران، على أن تنطلق وتعود حصراً إلى مطار النجف، وتقتصر على نقل الزوار الإيرانيين لأغراض دينية، وينتهي الترخيص في 28 أكتوبر/تشرين الأول 2026 أو عند إتمام المعاملات المصرح بها. كما يحظر نقل الأموال والمواد والأشخاص الخاضعين للعقوبات، مع إلزام الخطوط العراقية بتقديم بيانات الركاب والمعاملات إلى OFAC.
أليس من حق العراق ان يبحث عن مصالحه كما تبحث ايران عن مصالحها؟
ايران ترى ان مصلحتها بأن تمتلك قرارها الوطني بالكامل، ان تكون مستقلة اقتصادياً وسياسياً وثقافياً. ايران تريد أن يكون لها الحق الذي تمتلكه اي دولة أخرى، دون أن يكون قرارها تابعاً لأحد. أليس هذا هو شعار المجتمع الدولي منذ الحرب العالمية الثانية؟
هل من حق العراق أن يبحث عن مصالحه؟ بالطبع، لكن هناك فرق كبير بين من يرى مصلحته في استقلال قراره وامتلاك سيادته …
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @denhamza. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
حمزة الجابري @a_hamzaaljabri · 85,858 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 17 August 2026
الشيخ حبيب الكاظمي @Jwahrh · 24,433 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 September 2026
الاستاذ طه حسين- مدرس اللغة الانكليزية @mr19944 · 41,750 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“حمزة الجابري ( القناة الثانية)” (@denhamza), 5,807 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/denhamza.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
