Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Men of the World

Channel

Men of the World

@menoftheworld

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

132subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002208062662
TypeChannel
Username@menoftheworld
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/menoftheworld

Growth

1327 Aug 2026, 14:02 — 132 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 00:31 — 132 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 14:029 Aug 2026, 00:31
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 131–133 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 00:31132no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:02132first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.0%
avg views ÷ 132 subscribers
Avg views / post
40.9
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (31 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total818
Reactions total125
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 00:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
365
Videos
147
Links
346

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 33s
Average length
1m 33s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

125 reactions across 20 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2822.4%
💯2217.6%
👍1411.2%
👏1310.4%
🔥118.80%
😢118.80%
😁54.00%
🤷‍♀43.20%
🙏32.40%
🤔32.40%
💊21.60%
😱21.60%
🤨21.60%
🤯21.60%
🍌10.8%
🤷‍♂10.8%
🥰10.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 125reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC18 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

X ≠ Y или очевидная математика социума – 7 – А как живут Y Теперь соберём положение Y в одном месте. Y: · живёт на 8–12 лет меньше; · позже выходит на пенсию; · подлежит воинской повинности по признаку пола; · может быть лишён права покинуть страну; · может быть заключён в тюрьму за отказ служить; · может быть насильно отправлен убивать и умирать; · составляет 95% погибших р

3💯3😱2

8 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC16 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

X ≠ Y или очевидная математика социума – 6 – Родительские и репродуктивные права X В большинстве правовых систем X автоматически получает монопольный родительский статус, который Y должен дополнительно устанавливать. Например, в Европе зачастую X вне брака автоматически является единственным опекуном ребёнка. Y приобретает опекунство через брак, совместную декларацию, соответствующее сожительство либо обращение в су

👏32💯2

8 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC15 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

X ≠ Y или очевидная математика социума – 5 – Институциональная поддержка X Для X существуют: · отдельная структура ООН; · отдельная комиссия ООН; · официально признанный ООН международный день; · государственные стратегии здоровья; · специализированные гранты; · целевые предпринимательские программы; · образовательные инициативы; · премии, квоты и кампании представител

👏32💯2

8 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC16 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

X ≠ Y или очевидная математика социума – 4 – интерпретация Стеклянный потолок X считается общественной катастрофой. Заколоченность в гробу вины и ограничений Y, считается его личным выбором. Равенство уверенно доходит до совета директоров — и загадочным образом заканчивается у дверей обязанностей. X уже заметно опережает Y в образовании. В ЕС высшее образование имеют 50,6% молодых представителей X против 39,3% пред

💯51🔥1

8 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC15 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

X ≠ Y или очевидная математика социума – 3 – А как там на Западе? В Великобритании в 2024/25 году X составил только 5% погибших работников: остальные 95% были представителями Y. В США в 2024 году погибли 5 070 работников, из которых 4 657 — представители Y, то есть 91,9%. В тюрьмах ЕС X составляет лишь 5,5% заключённых. Следовательно, на Y приходится примерно 94,5%. В большинстве стран с доступными данными среди б

💯4🔥21

8 Aug 2026, 12:44 UTC19 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

X ≠ Y или очевидная математика социума – 2 – немного об Х Пол X: · живёт на 8–12 лет дольше. · Во многих государствах имеет право выходить на пенсию на 2–5 лет раньше, хотя Y умирает раньше. Закон предоставляет X право прекратить работать раньше исключительно по признаку пола. · Не подлежит сопоставимой принудительной мобилизации. · Не лишается права покинуть страну только из-за пола. ·

💯32🔥1🤔1🤷‍♀1

8 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC20 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

X ≠ Y или очевидная математика социума – 1 – Условие задачи У меня для тебя загадка. Представим два пола инопланетян — X и Y. Мы пока не будем раскрывать, кто из них кто. Иначе идеологический автопилот мгновенно определит, чьи страдания разрешено считать системными, а чьи положено объяснять неправильным образом жизни. [Legatus Virilis]

2🤔2🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 23:45 UTC32 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Демонстрация своего привилегированного статуса и возвышения принципов гедонизма является всеобъемлющей частью женского поведения, бессмысленного с моральной точки зрения. Женщина - это самовлюблённый нарцисс, трус, подлец и мерзавец. Все то что вы воображаете о самом мерзком типе из мужчин в женщине установлено по умолчанию, разница лишь в неявной реализации. Женщина - это завуалированный психопат, который никогда

👍8🤨2🤯2

7 Aug 2026, 13:53 UTC33 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁5🍌1👍1🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC70 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Ну чувак, защитник - ты уже выполнил долг - можешь быть свободен вместе со своей культей. И шо ты теперь сделаешь на одной ноге, а? Ебало завали и гордись Родиной, калека! А вы идите на фронт - а то придут буряты и шо они тогда с вами сделают?!

😢9💊2🤷‍♂1

3 Aug 2026, 21:24 UTC58 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ЕСТЬ ЛИ В МИРЕ МЕСТО, ГДЕ МУЖЧИНАМ ЖИВЕТСЯ ХОРОШО? - 3 Феминизм или "традиционные ценности" в СНГ - основная директива современного мира, которая на Западе обернута в обёртку "гендерного равенства". Так получилось, что у скандинавии и исландии "сошлись звезды": они очень богаты, а демократичная повестка левых требует чтобы все выглядело идеально. Мужчины там получает исключительно по касательной. Маскулизм как само

3👏3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @menoftheworld. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 466,325 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Men of the World” (@menoftheworld), 132 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/menoftheworld.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.