*HOOD AIRDROP* ✅ _Relax, the farming is just for 60 days so let's just do it for doing sake._ *This is giving $DOG vibe and remember $DOG also started in July, 2024 after $NOTCOIN.* https://t.me/Hoodappbot?start=HOODHGG6JK ✅Click and Join ✅Connect Wallet ✅Go to missions and do tasks ✅Daily check in ✅So far TON or STARS is not required, keep doing it. WAGMI 😎✅

Channel
Astuce 100%👍[airdrop, opportunité, etc...]
@memelandcrypto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002087451549 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @memelandcrypto |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/memelandcrypto |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 9 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:12 | 9 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 13 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 88.9%
- avg views ÷ 9 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 8.0
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (13 May 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 56 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 8
- Links
- 22
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
https://t.me/Hoodappbot?start=HOODHGG6JK
❕And most importantly, even before the TGE, your pets purchased with $GRAM will become NFT and will be tradable on GETGEMS. Listing on 17 September. 📈DEDUST / STON.FI / STORM TRADE / SWAP COFFEE 🦎 @grainlings_bot
https://t.me/Grainlings_bot/play?startapp=5409118496
https://t.me/+55j2Ouu3xuJjYWM0
https://telegram.me/Gramnetwork_bot?startapp=5409118496 Join Gram Network Bot and earn tokens!
@sixsevenclub_bot Mog
https://t.me/sixsevenclub_bot/app?startapp=ref_c8e83d75
https://t.me/BioProtocolMiningBot?start=7040215696 🚀 Join BIO Protocol Mining! Earn 1000 BIO just for signing up!
https://t.me/Xeffy_Bot?start=ref_5409118496
https://t.me/gramevents_bot?startapp=ref_302173 Join Gram Events and earn TON! 💎
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @memelandcrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Astuce 100%👍[airdrop, opportunité, etc...]” (@memelandcrypto), 9 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/memelandcrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.