Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 50 days, net +17,667. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 106,111–133,012 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 09:57
126,882
-2,154
19 Sept 2026, 00:58
129,036
-272
16 Sept 2026, 17:17
129,308
-297
14 Sept 2026, 16:56
129,605
-172
13 Sept 2026, 02:39
129,777
-66
11 Sept 2026, 05:22
129,843
+598
8 Sept 2026, 10:20
129,245
-309
5 Sept 2026, 04:18
129,554
-354
3 Sept 2026, 09:54
129,908
+7,608
2 Sept 2026, 04:33
122,300
+6,010
1 Sept 2026, 06:55
116,290
+66
31 Aug 2026, 07:46
116,224
-94
30 Aug 2026, 07:54
116,318
-62
29 Aug 2026, 10:48
116,380
-156
28 Aug 2026, 11:04
116,536
-167
27 Aug 2026, 09:03
116,703
-161
26 Aug 2026, 05:37
116,864
-138
25 Aug 2026, 04:08
117,002
-72
23 Aug 2026, 21:33
117,074
-226
22 Aug 2026, 05:27
117,300
first reading
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 120 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.9%
avg views ÷ 126,882 subscribers
Avg views / post
25,200
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held
28 (24 July 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total
75,600
Reactions total
2,092
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Oct 2026, 10:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
15
Links
18
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
103,221 reactions across 28 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
53,554
51.9%
👍
37,969
36.8%
custom 5238108342873762772
4,538
4.40%
👀
3,107
3.01%
🏆
1,454
1.41%
🆒
1,442
1.40%
👨💻
1,157
1.12%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103,221 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
274
across the posts below
Posts paid on
24
of 28 we hold a reading for · 86%
Most on one post
40
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @grainlings. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 24 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🦎Grainlings — protocol update.
Investor negotiations are complete, all questions settled. $GRAIL TGE moves to October 1. Farming closes September 29, two days before TGE. Launch is days away.
ℹ️More information will be available within 6 hours. We did everything we could to ensure the delay didn’t drag on for too long. We managed it.
We’ve already mentioned that our NFT will be available soon.
🧿You can now apply for an NFT in one simple way: by completing all the tasks in the “EARN” section.
📸To receive an NFT, you must complete all the tasks. The NFT CLAIM period will begin on 12 September at 18:00.
❕There are 7 days left until the TGE.
Listing on 17 September.
📈DEDUST / STON.FI / STORM TRADE / SWAP COFFEE
🦎 @grainlings_bot
Top leaderboards aren’t just numbers.
They represent an additional allocation of $GRAIL tokens.
17 September. The day we’ve all been waiting for.
The update everyone’s been waiting for is on its way. It’s going to be exciting.
GRAINLINGS SCATTER – it’s going to be epic.
We reckon a lot of you are familiar with Pragmatic Play’s GATES OF OLYMPUS, aren’t you?
The update is just around the corner.
It’s going to be…
🦎
🤝A major update is currently being uploaded to the server as our partner is still preparing for the launch. The launch is tentatively scheduled for Friday.
🦎GRAINLINGS continues to grow and now has 640,000 users!
We are also currently supporting a new project that has just opened its whitelist.
🎣Introducing: opahrex.app
You can now secure your place amongst the first 5,000 users to receive bonuses.
The real game…
🦎16 HOURS TO GO. THE BIGGEST UPDATE YET.
You know Sweet Bonanza and Gates of Olympus. Tomorrow Grainlings gets its own — GRAINLINGS SCATTER.
Tumbling reels, multiplier orbs up to 500x, free spins where the multiplier never resets. Highest win: 2,234x your bet.
👛USDT ON TON DROPS WHILE YOU PLAY. Coins land during normal spins and pay real USDT. No deposit, no purchase.
🐱CLAIM YOUR $GRAIL NFT.
Open EARN section, fi…
I hope many of you have noticed that we’ve now reached 400,000.
Why?
— Because we’re actively engaged in marketing.
Why?
— Because the TGE is on 17 September 2026.
Will we reach 1,000,000?
— Yes, and very quickly at that.
When will the campaign we recently wrote about take place?
— Everything is ready; we’re currently awaiting the final tweaks from our partner and will launch shortly.
Will there be another promo…
Official announcement!
A collaboration with a project that many of you will be familiar with kicks off on Monday! The project’s token is traded on Binance and a couple of other Tier 1 exchanges.
Get ready for Monday.
🦎GRAM referral promotion will be reactivated. The auto-withdrawal feature will be improved and will be able to process any number of requests.
🦎You’ll receive a gift from their project. They’ve alloc…
Take a look at the top clans and players.
Make a note of them.
We have a new partner, and they’ve set aside a prize pool of 6,000 $GRAM as a gesture of support.
The distribution is already underway.
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @grainlings. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 24 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Grainlings Announcement” (@grainlings), 126,882 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/grainlings.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.