Channel
@meigong7899
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,154subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1004329931854 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @meigong7899 @p6515 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 15 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/meigong7899 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:13 | 1,154 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:03 | 1,154 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 6 (15 July 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 113 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
👌美国驾驶证资料示例 ①正脸照片（必须正脸） ②姓:Ana名: tuomas ③出生年月日：1988/06/20 ④身高：180cm ⑤体重：80kg ⑥头发颜色： 黑色 ⑦眼睛颜色：棕色 ⑧地址：27453 Calicut Rd, Malibu, CA 90265 👌美国绿卡示例 ①正脸照片（必须正脸） ②姓:Ana名: tuomas ③出生年月日：1988/06/20 ④国籍：新加坡共和国 ⑤绿卡有效期10年：2015-2025年 ⑥出生国家：新加坡 👌美国护照示例 正脸照片（必须正脸） ① 姓：zhang名：san ②出生日期：1991/10/26 ③国籍：美利坚合众国 ⑤出生地：美国加州 ⑥护照有效期：2015-2025
需要看模版直接点击下方即可跳转⬇️⬇️⬇️ #工作证 #名片 #机票 #毕业证 证件 #中国 #台湾 #香港 #日本 #美国 #韩国 #英国 #英国 #波兰 #捷克 #科威 #瑞典 #瑞士 #印度 #澳门 #巴西 #德国 #法国 #老挝 #缅甸 #泰国 #英国 #越南 #荷兰 #阿根廷 #爱尔兰 #奥地利 #比利时 #菲律宾 #葡萄牙 #土耳其 #西班牙 #匈牙利 #俄罗斯 #柬埔寨 #新加坡 #意大利 #墨西哥 #加拿大 #格鲁吉亚 #罗马尼亚 #澳大利亚 #马来西亚 #印度尼西亚 需要看模版直接点击下方即可跳转👆👆 😙😙😴😴🔤@taotuia 😙😙😴😴🔤@sucaitaotu1Bot
#中国 #毕业证 🦧🦇🌻💋@taotuia
#荷兰 🦧🦇🌻💋@taotuia
#机票 🦧🦇🌻💋@taotuia
#中国 🦧🦇🌻💋@taotuia
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @meigong7899. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 137,815 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PS证件 美工设计 p图美工” (@meigong7899), 1,154 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/meigong7899.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.