Channel

海外素材 · 生活素材 · 精品素材 · 人物包装素材

@sucai1II

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,340subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1003441406941
Type	Channel
Username	@sucai1II
Created	Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	13 August 2026
Last confirmed live	14 August 2026
Measurements held	2
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegram	t.me/sucai1II

Growth

2 measurements spanning 1 day, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,338–8,354 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
14 Aug 2026, 14:18	8,340	-12
13 Aug 2026, 08:01	8,352	first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days: 4.00%; avg views ÷ 8,340 subscribers
Avg views / post: 334; 7 posts measured
Reaction rate: 0.244%; reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window: 7; of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
Window	Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held	7 (11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total	2,338
Reactions total	1
Forwards / comments	not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken	13 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime: 17s
Average length: 17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share	Share, drawn
❤	1	100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 2,861 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

【日本素材】日本美食-日常生活-人物包装 @qw_sucai
@riben_sucais · 3,3811 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 39 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

查档|开户|司法查询犯罪记录开房记录
@chadangho · 2,7551 post 搞笑视频吃瓜群众吃瓜新闻 chigua
@chiguagi · 2,1921 post 迪拜套图男🇦🇪迪拜素材🇦🇪迪拜人设🇦🇪迪拜三方
@dibai_taotu · 2,7771 post 俄罗斯套图男🇷🇺俄罗斯素材🇷🇺俄罗斯人设🇷🇺俄罗斯三方
@eluosi_taotuu · 2,8071 post 海外话术-精聊话术-精品话术-成功案例
@haushu5 · 1,6201 post Hello GPT 智能翻译销冠必备 Hello_Gpt168 Hello_GPT88
@Hello_GPT888A · 1,1821 post 电话轰炸-短信轰炸-手机轰炸-电话闹钟-轰炸短信-轰炸电话-轰炸手机
@hongzhajiggg · 4,3401 post 代开会员💢飞机会员💢TG会员💢电报会员
@huiyuanxx · 7671 post 柬埔寨套图女🇭🇹柬埔寨素材🇭🇹柬埔寨人设🇭🇹柬埔寨三方
@jianpuzhai_taotuu · 2,8391 post 军人素材👮🏻‍军人男性套图👮🏻‍军人人物包装【@qw_sucai乔碗素材】
@Junren_renshe · 2,6181 post 军人素材👮🏻‍军人女性套图👮🏻‍军人人物包装【@qw_sucai乔碗素材】
@Junren_taotuu · 2,6081 post 马来西亚套图男🇲🇾马来西亚素材🇲🇾马来西亚人设🇲🇾马来西亚三方
@malaixiya_taotuu · 2,7801 post PS证件美工设计 p图美工
@meigong7899 · 1,1541 post 墨西哥套图女🇲🇽墨西哥素材🇲🇽墨西哥人设🇲🇽墨西哥三方
@moxige_taotu · 2,8251 post 免费私密男素材
@siminan_sucai · 5291 post 套图｜人设套图【亚洲男】乔碗素材｜三方素材
@taotugm · 6,3431 post 私密女套图👙私密套图👙人设套图👙私密女素材👙私密素材👙私密包装👙私密人设
@taotugppp · 2,2561 post 土耳其套图男🇹🇷土耳其素材🇹🇷土耳其人设🇹🇷土耳其三方
@tuerqi_taotuu · 2,8211 post 香港套图男🇭🇰香港素材🇭🇰香港人设🇭🇰香港三方 @taotuia
@xianggang_taotuu · 3,2251 post 虚拟视频素材💋合适虚拟视频女性套图💋人物包装 sucai taotu
@xunishipin_renshe · 2,5501 post 虚拟视频素材💋合适虚拟视频男性套图💋人物包装 sucai taotu
@xunishipin_taotut · 2,5641 post p图-转账模拟器-作图软件功能介绍群-P图·作图
@zuotu_2345ZUOTU · 6,6441 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“海外素材 · 生活素材 · 精品素材 · 人物包装素材” (@sucai1II), 8,340 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sucai1II.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.