3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 378–379 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 05:49
378
-1
6 Aug 2026, 20:18
379
no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:08
379
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
73.3%
avg views ÷ 378 subscribers
Avg views / post
277
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held
18 (28 May 2026 – 1 August 2026)
Views total
1,109
Reactions total
45
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 20:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
210 reactions across 18 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
167
79.5%
👍
43
20.5%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 210reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❓چرا صحبت کردن درمورد نیمه پر لیوان و همواره امید دادن در دل بحران، رنج افراد رو کم نمیکنه؟
.
گاهی وقتا ما فکر میکنیم که وقتی فرد وسط بحران قرار داره، اینکه بهش از آینده بگیم یا به امیدواری دعوتش کنیم داریم کمکش میکنیم از درد بیاد بیرون. در واقع به نوعی ممکنه احساس کنیم که فرد چون ناامیده هیچ چیزی رو نمیتونه ببینه. ممکنه چنین فرضی درست باشه، اما یک لحظه خودمون رو بذاریم جای اون فرد. اون فرد دقیقا کجا وایساده و در…
ما نجات دهنده نیستیم!
.
از همان روزهایی که کار رواندرمانی را آغاز میکنید یا با رویای درمانگر شدن دوران کارشناسی را طی میکنید، شاید گاهی فانتزی «نجات دهنده بودن» در سرتان بچرخد یا آن را در میان همکلاسیها و همکاران خودتان مشاهده کنید. حالا که شاید در یک خاک بحرانزده قرار داریم این تفکر حتی بیشتر مشاهده شود.
.
فانتزی از این جنس که «رسالت من نجات دادن است». فانتزی که ما را به حرکت وامیدارد تا تصور کنیم که مسئولیت «…
این یک پویش ملی است
مردم ایران در بحرانهای مختلف بارها نشان دادهاند که حمایت از یکدیگر، بخشی از فرهنگ جمعی آنهاست؛ از زلزلۀ بم، آذربایجان و سرپلذهاب تا صفهای طولانی اهدای خون و میزبانی از یکدیگر در روزهای جنگ دوازدهروزه. ما در تاریکترین روزهای این سرزمین، کنار یکدیگر ایستادهایم.
امروز جامعۀ ما به شکل دیگری از این همراهی نیاز دارد: اینکه بیاموزیم هنگام مواجهه با هموطنی که در بحران روانی قرار دارد، چگونه آگا…
پذیرش، به معنای تسلیم شدن نیست.
.
در واقع، پذیرش به معنای گشودن فضایی است که بتونیم گذشته رو با خودمون همراه کنیم. در واقع برای تأثیر رنج و فقدان در شکلگیری تمام آن چیزی که امروز هستیم، جایگاهی قائل بشیم.
.
در این مسیر، سوگواری کردن برای آن چیزی که از دست رفته(فرصتها، نیازها، اهداف، روابط، اشخاص و...) دریچهای ایجاد میکنه و به فرد اجازه میده تا با اون چیزی که از دست داده و همچنین خودش، ارتباط و پیوند عمیقتری برق…
وقتی افراد به خشم سازگار خودشان در واکنش به ظلمی که بر آنها روا داشته شده، دست پیدا میکنند معمولاً با دو احساس روبهرو میشوند:
1) از یک سو، به دلیل برآورده نشدن نیازهایشان و نادیده گرفته شدنشان خشمگیناند،
2) از سوی دیگر، مراجعین برای فرصتها، زمان و تمام آن چیزی که از دست دادهاند، احساسی از جنس غم را تجربه میکنند.
.
درمانگر باید به مراجع کمک کند تا برای نیازهایی که به دلیل ظلم و پایمال شدن حقوق هرگز برآورده ن…
اونور توی کانال آرشیو کتاب 3تا لیست از #هیجان_مدار ، #تنظیم_هیجان ، #خودکشی قرار دادم. این لیستها آپدیت میشن و صرفا مرتب سازی فایلهایی بوده که جسته و گریخته روی کانال قرار میدادم. ترتیب خاصی هم ندارن بر مبنای علاقه و نیاز میتونین استفاده کنین.
غالب منابع گذاشته شده مناسب برای درمانگران هست.
لینک کانال آرشیو کتاب و مقالات
در جلسه درمانگر، مراجع را همراهی و از او حمایت میکند تا خشم سازگار خود را در مواجهه با مسائلی نظیر بیعدالتی، حس رهاشدگی، یا تجارب تلخ بدرفتاری و آزار، به شکل آزادانه و بدون هیچگونه مانعی ابراز کند. چنین ابراز بهجا و مناسبی از خشم، به تقویت ابراز و بیان جراتمندانه نیازهای میانفردی، توانمندسازی خود و تعیین مرزهای شخصی منجر میشود(گرینبرگ، رایس و الیوت، ۱۹۹۳). وقتی که مراجع به خشم اولیهای که از آگاهیاش به دور بود…
در راستای چیزی که پیشتر نوشته بودم این تیکه رو به شکل برداشتی از کتاب «Shame and Anger in Psychotherapy» آوردم:
گاهی اوقات، همدلی اصیل با خشم مراجع برای درمانگر دشوار است؛ بهویژه زمانی که این خشم از جنس ثانویه یا ناسازگار باشد. شاید مهمترین مانع برای پردازش هیجانی خشم، بیزاری و اجتناب درمانگر از این هیجان است. در واقع افراد بسیار کمی تمایل دارند تا در معرض خشم دیگری قرار بگیرند و درمانگر در جلسات نیز ممکن است چن…
حالا که صحبت از یالوم داغه. به یاد کتابی افتادم که احتمالا خیلی جاها اسمش رو شنیدین: When it is darkest
.
روری اوکانر که خودش پژوهشگر حوزه خودکشیه دوتا تجربه تلخ توی زندگیش داره. اولین تجربهاش استادی که ازش دعوت میکنه که پژوهش دکتری خودش رو در حوزه خودکشی انجام بده؛ اما چندی بعد همون استاد دست به خودکشی میزنه.
دومین تجربه تلخی که اوکانر بهش اشاره میکنه خودکشی یکی از دوستای نزدیکش بوده
.
اوکانر حتی توی کتاب اشاره می…
❤15
Signed Mehran.P
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @mehranpourmousavian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,133,542 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“هزارتوی روان| پورموسویان” (@mehranpourmousavian), 378 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mehranpourmousavian.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
