Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for فیلم آموزشی آشپزی

Channel

فیلم آموزشی آشپزی

@mehbano2

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

29,736subscribers

-54 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001086874340
TypeChannel
Username@mehbano2
Description« بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَنِ الرَّحِيمِ » @Mehrbano94 @mehbano4 @mehbano3 @ashpazzzzzi @selfservic منتظرحضورتون هستم https://instagram.com/_u/mehbano2_naderi
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mehbano2

Growth

29,73629,79029,7636 August 2026 — 29,790 subscribers7 August 2026 — 29,790 subscribers8 August 2026 — 29,783 subscribers9 August 2026 — 29,774 subscribers10 August 2026 — 29,761 subscribers11 August 2026 — 29,757 subscribers12 August 2026 — 29,748 subscribers13 August 2026 — 29,747 subscribers14 August 2026 — 29,736 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,728–29,798 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 20:4329,736-11
13 Aug 2026, 12:2529,747-1
12 Aug 2026, 09:0829,748-9
11 Aug 2026, 05:4729,757-4
10 Aug 2026, 09:0129,761-13
9 Aug 2026, 08:0129,774-9
8 Aug 2026, 07:3029,783-7
7 Aug 2026, 03:5629,790no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:1529,790first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.06%
avg views ÷ 29,736 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,400
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.357%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held40 (25 July 202615 August 2026)
Views total95,923
Reactions total342
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
8,870
Videos
22,200
Links
2,540

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
17m 10s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

342 reactions across 40 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
21763.5%
👏4011.7%
🥰3510.2%
👍349.94%
🔥72.05%
🤔51.46%
😐20.585%
🙈20.585%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 342reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 03:56 UTC686 views7 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

#فیلم_آموزشی #فیلم_آموزش_شیرینی_لوکس_فرانسوی @mehbano2 🍥🍥🍥🍥🍥🍥🍥

👏61

15 Aug 2026, 03:55 UTC691 views12 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

#فیلم_آموزشی #فیلم_آموزش_حلوا_با_فوت_و_فن @mehbano2 🥮🥮🥮🥮🥮🥮🥮

👏84

15 Aug 2026, 03:55 UTC588 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

#فیلم_آموزشی #فیلم_آموزش_سالاد_کریسمس @mehbano2 🥗🥗🥗🥗🥗🥗🥗

1

15 Aug 2026, 03:55 UTC578 views5 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

#فیلم_آموزشی #فیلم_آموزش_گارنیش_حرفه ای @mehbano2 🍚🍚🍚🍚🍚🍚🍚

👍4🤔1

15 Aug 2026, 03:48 UTC≈1,500 views6 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

🗣 جادوی سیاه کلمات کلماتی که روزانه استفاده می‌کنید، برنامه‌نویسیِ ضمیر ناخودآگاه شما هستند. کلماتی مثل "نمی‌توانم"، "سخت است"، "سعی می‌کنم"، ویروس‌هایی هستند که سیستم ذهن شما را مختل می‌کنند. کلمه "سعی می‌کنم" چرا خطرناک است؟ کلمه‌ای به نام "سعی کردن" نداریم! شما یا کاری را انجام می‌دهید، یا انجام نمی‌دهید! "سعی می‌کنم" بهانه ذهن برای آماده شدن جهت شکست است. از امروز به جای آن بگویید: "انجامش می‌دهم". عامل سوم که

6

13 Aug 2026, 03:57 UTC≈1,460 views11 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

#فیلم_آموزشی #فیلم_آموزش_پنیر_برشته @mehbano2 🧀🧀🧀🧀🧀🧀🧀

9🤔1😐1

13 Aug 2026, 03:57 UTC≈1,360 views14 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

#فیلم_آموزشی #فیلم_آموزش_ایده_تزیین @mehbano2 🍥🍥🍥🍥🍥🍥🍥

10👏4

13 Aug 2026, 03:57 UTC≈1,150 views8 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

#فیلم_آموزشی #فیلم_آموزش_عدسی @mehbano2 🍲🍲🍲🍲🍲🍲🍲

5👍3

13 Aug 2026, 03:57 UTC≈1,110 views7 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

#فیلم_آموزشی #فیلم_آموزش_انواع_چاقو @mehbano2 🍥🍥🍥🍥🍥🍥🍥

7

13 Aug 2026, 03:50 UTC≈3,100 views8 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

• جملاتی که کودک درونتون میخواد بشنوه : 1- لازم نیست کامل باشی تا لایق محبت و دوست داشته شدن باشی. 2- تو در امنیتی! 3- نیازی نیست خودت رو به دیگران ثابت کنی. 4- ناتوانی دیگران در قدردانی از تو،به این معنی نیست که تو بی ارزشی. 5- من تورو دوست دارم. 6- اتفاقاتی که افتاده تقصیر تو نبوده. 7- تو تمام تلاشت رو کردی. شما همون کودکی هستین که الان بزرگ شدین و کودک درون شما در اعماق ناخوداگاهتون زندگی میکنه.فراموشش نکنید و با

4🥰4

9 Aug 2026, 05:11 UTC≈2,690 views20 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

#فیلم_آموزش_ترشی_یک_روزه اینقدر خوشمزه میشه که باورت نمیشه یه روزه آماده شده @mehbano2 🍥🍥🍥🍥🍥🍥🍥

18👍2

9 Aug 2026, 05:11 UTC≈2,190 views11 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

#فیلم_آموزش_ترشی_بنه خوشمزه ترین و ترد ترین ترشی فصل همین ترشی بنه هست من قبلا خورده بودم ترشی بنه اما اصلا طعمش دوس نداشتم اما این مدلی خیلی ترد و خوشمزه شد همه خیلی دوس داشتن نکته مهمش اینه که بهتره بنه هاتون تازه و سبز رنگ باشن نیازی نیست تمام شاخه ها جدا کنید فقط شاخه های بزرگ جدا کنید مقدار اب و سرکه مساوی بود اصلا نیازی نیست آب جوش استفاده کنید فلفل توپی یا فلفل عنابی فرقی نداره سرکه سفید و قرمز فرقی ند

8👏3

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @mehbano2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 70,864 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“فیلم آموزشی آشپزی” (@mehbano2), 29,736 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mehbano2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.