10 measurements spanning 7 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,349–13,366 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 12:45
13,364
+4
12 Aug 2026, 12:16
13,360
+3
11 Aug 2026, 14:52
13,357
-7
10 Aug 2026, 13:24
13,364
+5
9 Aug 2026, 16:31
13,359
-2
8 Aug 2026, 16:54
13,361
+6
7 Aug 2026, 16:00
13,355
+4
6 Aug 2026, 18:53
13,351
-3
6 Aug 2026, 02:31
13,354
no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:48
13,354
first reading
Engagement
44 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.15%
avg views ÷ 13,364 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,090
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
44
of 44 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
44 (31 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
47,935
Reactions total
683
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 02:39 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
560 reactions across 35 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
252
45.0%
🔥
102
18.2%
👍
70
12.5%
😁
65
11.6%
custom 5210879448513024908
41
7.32%
🤩
25
4.46%
👎
3
0.536%
😡
1
0.179%
🤯
1
0.179%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 683reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 44 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mediomodo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 44 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
В Петербурге есть место, где можно оказаться в тропиках, не покупая билет до тропиков ☀️
Оранжерейный комплекс в Таврическом саду создавали для выращивания плодовых, овощных и теплолюбивых растений. А нынешняя оранжерея появилась здесь в 1930-е годы: сюда перенесли пальмовую оранжерею из Царского Села, построенную в 1900 году. Во время Великой Отечественной войны здание сильно пострадало, а в 1977 году его реконстру…
Встречайте фотографии:
vk.ru/album-101555956_313175193
7 августа в Петербурге прошла лекция Владимира Сурдина «Можно ли верить изображениям из космоса?»
#фото #сурдин
Друзья, вышло новое видео для наших донов — Атом-фест от Medio Modo.
Первый Атом Фест от Medio Modo! На нашем фестивале наши эксперты-лекторы рассказали о радиации с разных точек зрения — о повреждениях от радиационного облучения, об истории Чернобыльской катастрофы, а также о той пользе, которую может приносить радиация, например, в медицине.
Вы всегда можете присоединиться к сообществу донов Medio Modo, чтобы ре…
Когда-то за вещи, которые сегодня кажутся совершенно нормальными, можно было получить штраф, запрет или даже оказаться в суде...
Хотите носить бороду? Платите.
Хотите надеть шелк? Сначала убедитесь, что вам по статусу положено.
А если ваша свинья что-то натворила — ну, тут уже увидимся в суде.
Собрали несколько реальных правил и запретов из прошлого, которые сегодня звучат так, будто их придумал человек, которому…
Пять бесплатных билетов снова бесконтрольно гуляют по интернету.
Мы пытались их остановить... Не получилось.
Поэтому завтра они снова окажутся в нашем канале ВКонтакте.
В произвольное время выйдет пост с промокодом на бесплатный билет на любое мероприятие Medio Modo.
Промокод сработает только 5 раз!
Кто первым ввел — того и билет.
Кто пришел шестым — тот может винить интернет, работу, пробки, ретроградный Меркур…
😳 Санкт-Петербург, суббота, 5 сентября, 19:00
Светлана Гурьянова. «Авторка», «психологиня», «докторша»:
издевательство над языком или необходимость?
🔸О чём лекция?
Тема новых феминитивов часто делит людей на два противоборствующих лагеря, которые не могут услышать друг друга.
Одни готовы поставить на сторонниках феминитивов клеймо борцов (борчих?) с ветряными мельницами, уничтожающих русский язык. Другие настоль…
Лайк, если вы тоже уже видеть не можете покупной шашлык, и вернулись к заветам наших предков!
Дизлайк, если вы "фууууу, как можно личным контееееентом портить канал лектооооорияяяяяя!"
Кажется, мы нашли место, где лекции летом звучат еще лучше...
На крыше Дизайн Завода в Москве 29 августа устроим Крыша-Фест: три лекции — про историю крыш, творческие войны и средневековый «божий суд»: mediomodo.ru/krysha-fest
А на следующий день там же Алексей Решетун расскажет, зачем вообще люди придумали анатомические театры и как они развивались в Европе и России: mediomodo.ru/reshetun-msk
В общем, крыша будет…
Сегодня мы дополняем нашу книжную полку книгой «Открытие природы» Андреа Вульф.
«Открытие природы» Андреа Вульф — увлекательный роман о страсти к науке, к путешествиям и к самой жизни.
На страницах книги Александр фон Гумбольдт предстаёт не в пыльном кабинете, а в гуще тропического леса, на склоне дымящегося вулкана, на каноэ среди амазонских вод. Его жизнь — это сплошное приключение, но при этом — интеллектуальный…
Расписание на неделю:
👨🦳 🎥 12 августа, 19:30, Москва
Алексей Водовозов.
Аква Тофана и другие приключения мышьяка.
mediomodo.ru/vodovozov-msk-aqua-tofana
👨🦳 🎥 15 августа, 19:00, Москва
Алексей Третьяков.
Иуда Искариот. Научно-исторический взгляд на предателя и предательство.
mediomodo.ru/tretyakov-msk-iuda-iskariot
👨🦳 🎲 16 августа, 19:00, Москва
Быстрые свидания от Medio Modo.
mediomodo.ru/fastdating-msk-16augus…
👨🦳 🎲 Москва, воскресенье, 16 августа, 19:00
Medio Modo. Быстрые свидания.
Количество мест ограничено!
🔸Что будет на мероприятии:
Приглашаем вас на быстрые свидания от Medio Modo! Поможем интеллектуальным девочкам найти интеллектуальных мальчиков и наоборот.
Формат: классические быстрые свидания. Вы сидите за столиками и общаетесь с каждым из представителей противоположного пола по 5 минут.
Девочки сидят за сто…
👍4❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @mediomodo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@mediomodo edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Выбрали бы другую профессию (какую пишите в комменты)20%
Открыл бы своё дело (если вы сейчас работаете в найме)5%
Остался бы лучше в найме, а не занимался своим бизнесом2%
Вообще укатил бы в монастырь в горах и не манался вот с этим вот всем32%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 11,024 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лекторий Medio Modo” (@mediomodo), 13,364 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mediomodo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.