Подруга угостила баклажанами, я приготовила салат с хрустящими 👍 Впервые попробовала его и полюбила в 2021г в ресторане «Телеграф» в городе Зеленоградск🥰 А вы любите?
❤13👍13🔥4🥰3

Channel
@mb_cook
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,729subscribers
-83 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001285741555 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mb_cook |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mb_cook |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 9,729 | -17 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 16:20 | 9,746 | -8 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 00:00 | 9,754 | -8 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 12:19 | 9,762 | -12 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 14:15 | 9,774 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:47 | 9,775 | -5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:28 | 9,780 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:52 | 9,785 | +4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 9,781 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:12 | 9,783 | -6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:26 | 9,789 | -10 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 9,799 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 9,805 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:53 | 9,813 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:00 | 9,812 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 9,812 | first reading |
54 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 54 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,106 reactions across 54 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 696 | 33.0% | |
| 👍 | 404 | 19.2% | |
| 🥰 | 380 | 18.0% | |
| 🔥 | 255 | 12.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 74 | 3.51% | |
| 🤣 | 54 | 2.56% | |
| 🎉 | 52 | 2.47% | |
| 🙏 | 36 | 1.71% | |
| 💯 | 35 | 1.66% | |
| 😁 | 32 | 1.52% | |
| 👏 | 31 | 1.47% | |
| 😍 | 21 | 0.997% | |
| 🤩 | 12 | 0.57% | |
| 💋 | 10 | 0.475% | |
| 😢 | 9 | 0.427% | |
| 🍾 | 4 | 0.19% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.047% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,106 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5jtCeReNx12oajzgVmbBXL1 | 1 | 8 August 2026 | 8 August 2026 |
| 5jtCeReNx12oajzgWDdvFsW | 1 | 12 August 2026 | 12 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Подруга угостила баклажанами, я приготовила салат с хрустящими 👍 Впервые попробовала его и полюбила в 2021г в ресторане «Телеграф» в городе Зеленоградск🥰 А вы любите?
❤13👍13🔥4🥰3
Сливовый пирог🔥🔥🔥 Еще один рецепт в вашу копилку вкусных сливовых пирогов! Сливу не очень люблю, но в пирогах она божественна👌 Она дает кислинку, сочность, аромат- всё, что нужно вкусному пирогу. Без лишних слов… Листайте карусель фотографий, отправляйте 👍🏻❤️🔥, сохраняйте рецепт и готовьте с удовольствием 😀
❤21👍6🥰2
Доброе утро 🫶🏻
🥰11❤5👍5
ВЯЛЕНЫЕ СЛИВЫ⠀ Если в двух словах, то для меня это еще вкуснее, чем вяленые помидоры!⠀ ⠀ А если не в двух, то это все равно оочень вкусно. Рецепт похож на помидорный, только вот ломтики чеснока я кладу на каждую половинку сливы. Баночки с ними тоже храню в холодильнике.⠀ ⠀ Как использовать? Да как угодно! -бутерброд с паштетом и вялеными сливами (как на фото)⠀ -тост с мясом и в.с.⠀ -брускетта с творо…
👍20❤8🥰4
Доброе утро 🫶🏻
🥰16👍8😍4👌1
Вчера опубликовала пост с рецептом этого чудесного пирога. А это видео - все просто, красиво и вкусно! Рецепт в граммах смотрите во вчерашнем посте❤️
❤25🥰10👍6🔥3🎉1😍1
Доброе утро 🫶🏻
❤10👍4💯4🥰2🎉1🔥1😍1
Сезон слив на прилавках в самом разгаре. Решила напомнить вам этот чудесный рецепт! БЮРГЕРСКОЕ СЧАСТЬЕ. Красивый, вкусный, эффектный внешне и несложный в приготовлении. Если вы его еще не пробовали- пробуйте! Если уже пекли - повторите! Это божественно вкусно и фантастически нарядно!🔥 Пеките с удовольствием ❤️ Я этот рецепт нашла несколько лет назад у Алены Спириной и влюбилась с первого взгляда и с первого кус…
❤🔥26👍14💯4❤3🔥2🥰2😍2🎉1
Доброе утро 🫶🏻
❤18👍6🥰5❤🔥1🎉1💯1🔥1😍1
Доброе утро 🫶🏻 Оказывается, я уже вчера показала этот лист календаря🙈🤣 Сейчас только это заметила)
❤19😁7🥰5❤🔥3👍2🔥2💯1
Доброе утро 🫶🏻 Я сегодня выспалась 🥳
👍20🥰12🔥6❤🔥2😁2🎉1👏1😍1
Захотелось оладьев на завтрак. Мои любимые - на кефире без яиц Рецепт тут⤵️ https://t.me/mb_cook/12644
🔥17👍9❤6🥰4😍4👏2💯2❤🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @mb_cook. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 34 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Марина Баранова” (@mb_cook), 9,729 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mb_cook.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.