Channel
@maxvalpro
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
247subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002056326704 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @maxvalpro |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/maxvalpro |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 02:18 | 247 | +2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 14:38 | 245 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 247 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:49 | 248 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 246 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 246 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
104 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 62 | 59.6% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 16.3% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 5.77% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 5.77% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 4.81% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 3.85% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 3.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 104 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как фанатка Gallup, не могла пройти мимо их свежего исследования 👀 Вовлечённость сотрудников в США застыла на 31% — как в 2025-м. Но интересно другое: искусственный интеллект сам по себе вовлечённость не повышает. Работает только связка «ИИ + чёткие ожидания + поддержка руководителя». Главные цифры от Gallup: — Сотрудники, чей руководитель активно поддерживает использование ИИ, вовлечены в 1,6 раза чаще (48% проти…
❤6🥰4🔥2
В новом выпуске у меня в гостях Юля — её история — это 11 лет внутри Dodo Brands: от ухода из банка в индустрию общепита до руководства IT-юнитом и работы над продуктом, который ежедневно видят миллионы людей. Мы говорили о том, как в стартап-культуре можно вырасти очень быстро, если не бояться брать на себя больше, чем написано в должностной инструкции, и почему человекоцентричная среда иногда удерживает сильнее лю…
❤5🔥5
Вэл из MAXVAL pinned «Не бывает плохой музыки Новый выпуск подкаста «Я хочу от тебя инсайт» уже здесь. Сегодня у нас в гостях — Дима Кирин — диджей, артист и художественный руководитель REVOLD PROJECT. Человек, который после работы в строительстве полностью посвятил себя музыке.…»
Не бывает плохой музыки Новый выпуск подкаста «Я хочу от тебя инсайт» уже здесь. Сегодня у нас в гостях — Дима Кирин — диджей, артист и художественный руководитель REVOLD PROJECT. Человек, который после работы в строительстве полностью посвятил себя музыке. Вместе с Вэл обсудили, что делает диджея профессионалом, зачем артисту личный бренд, как научиться слушать музыку осознанно и почему хороший диджей — это прежд…
❤8🤩6🔥4
Вэл из MAXVAL pinned «40 миллионов просмотров — вообще не гарантия успеха Подкаст «Я хочу от тебя инсайт» продолжает знакомить вас с людьми, которым не просто «повезло». За их историями стоят годы трудов, ошибок и маленьких шагов. В новом выпуске у нас в гостях — фуд-блогер Анна…»
40 миллионов просмотров — вообще не гарантия успеха Подкаст «Я хочу от тебя инсайт» продолжает знакомить вас с людьми, которым не просто «повезло». За их историями стоят годы трудов, ошибок и маленьких шагов. В новом выпуске у нас в гостях — фуд-блогер Анна Биркина. Когда-то она работала школьным учителем, а сегодня её рецепты собирают миллионы просмотров. Но что стоит за красивой картинкой? Аня и Вэл поговорили о…
😍4❤2
В новом выпуске «Я хочу от тебя инсайт» у меня в гостях Дима Кирин — диджей-артист, создатель и руководитель творческого проекта Revold Project, коллекционер музыки и наставник для начинающих диджеев. Мы говорили о том, что: Личный бренд диджея — это аутентичность Не «маска на сцене», а живой меломан, который честно делится тем, что сам любит, и не делит музыку на «правильную» и «неправильную». Revold Project — ка…
❤10🔥6👍5
Хорошие были выходные 🤍 А можно ещё? А то у меня, кажись, спонтанная дофаминовая яма нарисовалась. Ну или я после финала ЧМ не выспалась. Хоть бы поэтому, хоть бы поэтому
❤7
Нерпочки, действительно как мы себя ведут 🤣🙏🏻
❤12😁6
💔
❤12
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @maxvalpro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вэл из MAXVAL” (@maxvalpro), 247 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maxvalpro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.