Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for canale di sii_te

Channel

canale di sii_te

@sii_te

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

276subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001157421137
TypeChannel
Username@sii_te
Created28 January 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 October 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/sii_te

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2752772767 August 2026 — 277 subscribers8 August 2026 — 277 subscribers10 October 2026 — 276 subscribers16 October 2026 — 275 subscribers23 October 2026 — 276 subscribers7 August 202623 October 2026
5 measurements spanning 77 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 275–277 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Oct 2026, 20:07276+1
16 Oct 2026, 09:55275-1
10 Oct 2026, 02:39276-1
8 Aug 2026, 08:35277no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:59277first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 24s
Average length
1m 42s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏342.9%
❤‍🔥228.6%
⚡114.3%
👍114.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC16 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZGdxkmKpX/

👏1

Signed M-A:N.S.

7 Aug 2026, 05:57 UTC13 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @IIFUfficialeVideo

Video, posted without a caption

⚡1

Signed M-A:N.S.

6 Aug 2026, 05:56 UTC16 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Lamberto_Rimondini_CANALE

🚨 LA RESA DEI CONTI CON LA NARRATIVA COVID È INIZIATA. E adesso, per i “cani da riporto” della controinformazione, si apre un problema enorme. Per anni ci hanno raccontato che nulla sarebbe mai cambiato. Che il sistema era intoccabile. Che il Deep State controllava tutto. Che Trump non avrebbe potuto — o voluto — scalfire nulla. Poi arriva Jay Bhattacharya alla guida del NIH, uno dei più duri critici delle politic…

👏1

Signed M-A:N.S.

5 Aug 2026, 21:36 UTC22 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHgqnIIhI7k

Signed M-A:N.S.

5 Aug 2026, 21:36 UTC14 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Lamberto_Rimondini_CANALE

IL MAROCCO L’HA FATTO: MA PERCHÉ? Il Marocco non ha facilitato questa situazione per punire la Spagna su Gaza. Non stava agendo su ordini degli Stati Uniti o di Israele. La ragione è molto più semplice: aveva funzionato in precedenza. Il Marocco ha usato la stessa tattica durante la crisi di Ceuta del 2021 e ha concluso che la migrazione è uno strumento efficace di pressione politica. Quindi l’ha usata di nuovo, qu…

Signed M-A:N.S.

5 Aug 2026, 21:36 UTC12 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Lamberto_Rimondini_CANALE

1. «La Camera ha autorizzato il trasferimento di territorio spagnolo al Marocco» ❌ FALSO Questo è l'errore principale. Esiste davvero un documento del Congresso americano che parla di Ceuta e Melilla. È il report della House Appropriations Committee che accompagna H.R. 8595, il National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2027. La pagina ufficiale della House Rules Committee iden…

Signed M-A:N.S.

5 Aug 2026, 21:36 UTC15 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Lamberto_Rimondini_CANALE

6. C'è però una coincidenza temporale interessante? 🟡 SÌ, ma non prova una regia Qui il post tocca un elemento che merita attenzione. Il rapporto americano è precedente alla grande crisi migratoria. La crisi di fine luglio ha poi visto decine di migliaia di persone tentare/effettuare attraversamenti verso Ceuta. Reuters ha ricostruito come un importante fattore scatenante sia stata la diffusione sui social di info…

Signed M-A:N.S.

5 Aug 2026, 21:36 UTC15 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Lamberto_Rimondini_CANALE

rapporto congressuale → trasferimento territoriale → autorizzazione dell'invasione → complotto Trump/Israele/golpe. Il primo elemento è documentato. Gli altri non discendono dalle prove disponibili. Documento ufficiale della House Appropriations Committee H.R. 8595 – House Rules Committee Testo ufficiale H.R. 8595 su GovInfo Votazione ufficiale della Camera del 15 luglio Se vuoi, posso fare anche una cosa più i…

Signed M-A:N.S.

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @sii_te. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“canale di sii_te” (@sii_te), 276 subscribers as measured 23 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sii_te.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.