Channel
@masumeh_lashkari
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
42,627subscribers
-621 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001848756083 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @masumeh_lashkari |
| Description | #معصومه_لشکری روانشناس و نویسنده شماره دفتر:02144385637 02140440867 #زوج_درمانی #نوروتراپی با ما سلامت روان و رابطه ی خود را بیمه کنید وبسایت رسمی استادلشکری👇 http://masoumehlashkari.com |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 22 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/masumeh_lashkari |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:02 | 42,627 | -44 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 12:40 | 42,671 | -58 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:17 | 42,729 | -59 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 14:07 | 42,788 | -40 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:06 | 42,828 | -28 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:35 | 42,856 | -41 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 42,897 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:14 | 42,904 | -15 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:23 | 42,919 | +11 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:02 | 42,908 | +13 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 42,895 | -11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 42,906 | +83 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:44 | 42,823 | +122 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:44 | 42,701 | -112 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 05:53 | 42,813 | -49 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 42,862 | -69 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 08:06 | 42,931 | -46 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 09:27 | 42,977 | -55 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:08 | 43,032 | -77 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 43,109 | first reading |
99 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 70 of 85 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 99 (8 August 2026 – 9 September 2026) |
| Views total | 171,436 |
| Reactions total | 2,368 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Sept 2026, 12:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,710 reactions across 83 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 938 | 34.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 592 | 21.8% | |
| 👌 | 403 | 14.9% | |
| 👍 | 387 | 14.3% | |
| 🔥 | 103 | 3.80% | |
| 💔 | 81 | 2.99% | |
| 🕊 | 36 | 1.33% | |
| 🥰 | 33 | 1.22% | |
| 🗿 | 32 | 1.18% | |
| 🫡 | 24 | 0.886% | |
| 🙏 | 23 | 0.849% | |
| 💯 | 18 | 0.664% | |
| 😍 | 12 | 0.443% | |
| 🤷 | 10 | 0.369% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 0.185% | |
| 🆒 | 4 | 0.148% | |
| 🤨 | 4 | 0.148% | |
| 🤷♀ | 3 | 0.111% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 0.074% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 83 of the 99 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,710 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 99 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
نتیجهی اون عددی که انتخاب کردی، «شخصیت» تو نیست؛ مرحلهایه که الان توش قرار داری. بعد از خیانت، بیشتر آدمها بین شوک، خشم، وابستگی، عذاب وجدان و بیاعتمادی دستبهدست میشن. برای همین، تصمیمهای عجولانه معمولاً از روی احساس گرفته میشن، نه آگاهی. اگر احساس میکنی توی یکی از این مرحلهها گیر کردی، من میتونم کمکت کنم اول بفهمی الان دقیقاً کجای این مسیر ایستادی و بعد درباره ادامه رابطه تصمیم بگیری. کلمه «ارزیابی» + شم…
👏11
اگر همین امروز بفهمی همسرت بهت خیانت کرده… اولین واکنشت چیه؟ 1️⃣ همون لحظه همهچیز رو تموم میکنم. 2️⃣ میدونم اشتباه کرده، ولی هنوز نمیتونم ازش جدا بشم. 3️⃣ دلم میخواد ببخشم، اما دیگه نمیدونم چطور اعتماد کنم. 4️⃣ هنوز نمیدونم دقیقاً چی شده و مدام خودم رو سرزنش میکنم. 5️⃣ از رابطه بیرون اومدم، ولی ذهنم هنوز درگیرشه.
رفقای جان یه نکته طلایی ما توقع داریم اول مسیر رشد 🌱 • بدون نقص باشیم • اشتباهی نکنیم • عالی باشیم همین باعث میشه مدت ها از زندگی عقب بیوفتیم ...🫠
👏20
وقتی همیشه سکوت میکنی، اطرافیانت فکر میکنن حق دارن بیشتر پیش برن...
👌28👍14👏1
اینجا یک اشتباه رایج اتفاق میافته: زن بهجای اینکه بفهمه چه چیزی در رابطه تغییر کرده، شروع میکنه خودش رو زیر سؤال بردن: «نکنه من جذاب نیستم؟» «نکنه دیگه دوستم نداره؟» «نکنه زن دیگهای هست؟» در حالی که گاهی مرد، خانه و رابطه را تبدیل کرده به جایی برای امنیت، عادت و تکرار؛ جایی که مطمئنه تو هستی و دیگر لازم نمیبینه برای بهدست آوردنت تلاش کنه. اما اینجا قرار نیست زن بیشتر محبت کنه یا بیشتر کوتاه بیاد… باید نوع ارتبا…
👌33👍9👏1
تا حالا شده همسرت توی جمع با بقیه خیلی صمیمی و گرم باشه… ولی توی همون جمع، یهجوری با تو رفتار کنه که انگار اصلاً همسرش نیستی؟! نه لزوماً خیانت… نه حتی حرف بد… فقط یک چیزی ته دلت بگه: «چرا برای بقیه اینقدر حواسش جمعه، برای من نه؟» یه سؤال: اگر این اتفاق برات افتاده، بیشتر ناراحت شدی یا حسودی کردی؟
👏35
چقدر گردش زندگی عجیبه دوستان دقیقا هر کسی هر مدلی باهات رفتار میکنه ، دقیقا در رابطت با اون آدم تو با خودت رفتار میکنی مثلا دوستت نداره ، چون تو در مقابلش خودت رو نادیده میگیری بهت عشق نمیده ؟ چون بهش میرسی به خودت عشق نمیدی ! نادیدت میگیره؟ چون اونقدر ی که تو اون رو میبینی خودت رو نمیبینی 📍کل ماجرای روابط ما همینه 📍 🗯️با خودت چطوری؟❤️
👏48👍27👌1
نتیجه عزیز دلم از دانشپذیران دوره های آموزشی مجموعه ، بدقت گوش بدید ❤️ #دوره_لیدی_سنس #دوره_ققنوس
👏16
💫میدونی هدفم چیه💪؟؟؟ یک روز به جای اینکه با خودت بگی: «چرا سرد شده؟»❌ «چرا مثل قبل نیست؟»❌ «نکنه دیگه دوستم نداره؟»❌ «چیکار کنم دوباره جذبم بشه؟»❌ بتونی با آرامش بفهمی💃: چه اتفاقی در رابطه افتاده و من دقیقاً باید چه واکنشی نشون بدم. دیگه برای گرفتن توجه، خودت رو کوچک نکنی. برای نگه داشتن رابطه، از خواستههات نگذری. برای دوست داشته شدن، نقش بازی نکنی. و مهمتر از همه… ❤️ رابطهات از جایی تغییر میکنه که رابطه…
👏27🥰6🗿1
فاز ۳-عزت نفس، سلفلاو و کاریزمای ملکه اینجا کاریزمای مغناطیسی زنانه رو فعال میکنی. جادوی سلفلاو یعنی دیگه برای توجه گدایی نمیکنی خودت چشمهٔ جذابیت میشی. راه رفتنت، نگاهت، سکوتت سلاح میشن.
👏13
فاز ۲: تسلط هیجانی و شفای درونی هر بار که توی عشق زخم خوردی یه تیکه از قدرتت رو جا گذاشتی. اینجا با Shadow Work و شفای کودک درون ، زخمها رو ترمیم میکنی و از مثلث کارپمن خارج میشی. تکنیکهای تخصصی پاکسازی و رهایی کدهای مخفی پاکسازی ذهنی و انرژیایی که لجنهای گذشته رو از بدنت میشوره. ترکیب پاکسازی و مدیتیشن انگار روح و رحمت رو با نور میشوری. یاد میگیری بیتقلا، بیالتماس، بیگدایی، عشق رو جذب کنی.
اگر دوس داشتی بقیش رو بگم قلب بزارم
❤🔥62🥰5
Showing the 12 most recent of 99 posts we hold for @masumeh_lashkari. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@masumeh_lashkari edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
کدوم گزینه در مورد شما صدق میکنه⁉️⁉️⁉️
The shares total 363%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
از کارگاه لیدی سنس چیزی نشدی
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
تو کدومش رو داری
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 99 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 9 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“معصومه لشکری|روانشناس” (@masumeh_lashkari), 42,627 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/masumeh_lashkari.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.