Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net +61. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,954–2,057 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 19:38
2,030
-2
13 Sept 2026, 05:01
2,032
+1
8 Sept 2026, 22:41
2,031
-9
3 Sept 2026, 23:39
2,040
-2
31 Aug 2026, 08:35
2,042
+9
28 Aug 2026, 15:02
2,033
-5
25 Aug 2026, 04:53
2,038
+1
22 Aug 2026, 11:54
2,037
-8
18 Aug 2026, 22:34
2,045
+11
15 Aug 2026, 19:43
2,034
+67
12 Aug 2026, 07:06
1,967
+1
9 Aug 2026, 17:51
1,966
-3
7 Aug 2026, 04:00
1,969
no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:48
1,969
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
203 reactions across 22 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
131
64.5%
❤🔥
48
23.6%
😍
12
5.91%
🤩
8
3.94%
🫡
3
1.48%
🍓
1
0.493%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 203 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎀پادکست شماره ی ۱🎀
چگونه عملگرا باشیم؟💯
پگاه نظیر ، مربی توسعه ی فردی✨️💗
خوشحال میشم این پادکست رو برای افرادی که می دونی نیاز دارن بشنون بفرستی تا انرژیش هزار برابر به زندگیت برگرده دوست قشنگم😍
#پادکست_اول
@tamrinejazb98 💖🌻
@nazirpegah 💖🌻
کانال بله: Pegahnazir
کانال روبیکا: Pegahnazir
🎀قانون عدد ۱🎀
🎀تا حالا چندبار شده بخوای کاری رو مثل ورزش، یاد گرفتن زبان، مطالعه کتاب و .. شروع کنی بری کلاس ثبت نام کنی یا وسایل مورد نیاز بخری اما ...
🎀یکی از این اتفاقات برات بیوفته؟
۱. اصلا شروع نکنی.
۲. کمی بعد از شروع ادامه ندی.
🎀حالا چرا این اتفاقا میوفته؟چون مغز ما آدم ها زیر بار وظایفی که انرژی زیادی ازمون میگیره نمیره!
🎀چاره چیه؟عاداتی در ما شکل میگیرن که در ساده ترین حالت ممکن شروع شده باشن.
🎀اینج…
من قانون جذب رو ۷سال پیش برای خودم شروع کردم و عاششششق متافیزیک و این مباحث هستم کلا و اعتقاد و یقیین ۱۰۰ دارم بهش.
من تو این ۷سال روزی نشده مطالعه نکرده باشم و ویس تو این مسیر گوش نداده باشم.
هرروز با عشق و ذوق فراوان مطالعه کردم.
برای خودم
و بعد با عشق به شماهاهم گفتم.❤️
چون این شغلی نیست که دوست داشته باشم توش معروف بشم🥹❤️
کاملا دلی اینجا باهاتونم و اگرم هزینه ای دریافت می کنم چون واقعا تایم و انرژی زیادی برای فعالیت تو کانال و ضبط دوره ها ازم میره🫶🏻
یه سری دوستان بهم گفتن هزینه ی کافی برای شرکت تو کارگاه رو ندارن.
دوستان توی چالشی که هدیه شده و کاملا رایگان از امروز برگزارش کردیم و شروع شده،من یه تمرینی واسه پول میگم بهتون که ۵۰۰ هزار تومان هیچه ، ۵۰۰ میلیون تومان تجلی میدی اگر انجامش بدی مستمر.
پس حتما در چالش شرکت کنید: 👈🏻 @nazirpegah
تاریخ دقیق ثبت نام <<کارگاه برگشت یار>>✨️❤️🫂
🦋سه شنبه ۲۷ مرداد ماه🫀
از ساعت ۸ صبح الی ۱۲ شب
با 50% تخفیف برای کسانی که در این روز ثبت نام می کنن
یعنی فقط با قیمت 500 هزار T میتونید عضو کارگاه عملی بازگشت عشق بشید در ۲۷ مرداد♥️
❇️به زودی درباره ی کارگاه توضیحات با جزئیات تری ارائه خواهم داد🙏✅✅✅
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @tamrinejazb98. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
خانواده مسعود @m_a_s_o_u_di · 37,861 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 1 September 2026
معصومه لشکری|روانشناس @masumeh_lashkari · 42,335 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 28 August 2026
تندخوانی و حافظه قوی🧠 @alireza_tajabadi · 52,480 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“پگاه نظیر | توسعه فردی🎀” (@tamrinejazb98), 2,030 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tamrinejazb98.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.