Независимый взгляд на строительство, недвижимость, архитектуру и PR. Разбираю решения девелоперов, городские проекты и рыночные тренды — коротко, с контекстом и личным мнением. Автор — Антон Мастренков.
Created
Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 363–365 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 06:32
364
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:24
364
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
40.7%
avg views ÷ 364 subscribers
Avg views / post
148
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
17 (28 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
2,518
Reactions total
196
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 06:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
456
Videos
12
Links
124
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
18s
Average length
18s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
196 reactions across 17 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
56
28.6%
❤
30
15.3%
💯
23
11.7%
👏
18
9.18%
😁
8
4.08%
🤔
8
4.08%
⚡
7
3.57%
👀
6
3.06%
✍
5
2.55%
🍾
5
2.55%
👍
5
2.55%
🕊
5
2.55%
💋
4
2.04%
🤪
4
2.04%
❤🔥
2
1.02%
👾
2
1.02%
😇
2
1.02%
😱
2
1.02%
🙏
2
1.02%
custom 5264737672684907396
1
0.51%
1 further kind
1
0.51%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 196reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В столице нет Бурбон-стрит как в Новом Орлеане или Рубинштейна как в Питере. И это доказывает, что Москва – город победившего полицентризма, по крайней мере, если судить по карте баров!
Согласно исследованию CORE.XP в Москве 650 баров, пабов и рюмочных.
🍻 Около 60% — внутри Садового кольца, еще 8% расположено между Садовым и ТТК, а оставшаяся треть — в спальных районах и возле фудмоллов - для удобства жителей!
🍷С…
Что есть норма? А норматив?
Вот гендиректор ФАУ "ФЦС" Владимир Калинкин утверждает, что принятый на днях Свод правил станет эталоном планирования территорий в России.
Документ интересный и всеобъемлющий, он задает пример обеспечения людей всякой инфраструктурой.
Например, регламентирует количество квадратных метров пляжа на каждого отдыхающего, ширину проездов для электросамокатов, а также минимальное расстояние м…
Чтобы ни у кого не возникало вопросов ху из… ху, собрал список агентств и людей, которые могут в строительный (и не только) PR
Вчера активно обсуждали появление нового агентства на рынке недвижимости и коллеги пожаловались, что не всех знают. Ну что же, восполняю этот пробел.
Агентства:
Maksimova & Bykov Consulting
Be Tone Agency
Pr. Dev
Сообщники
Wainbrand Partners
Правила общения
Community Real Estate
PR …
На улицы Москвы вышли роботы-полицейские!
🤖 Когда в детстве мы смотрели "Робокопа" нам казалось, что это далекая фантастика. Но будущее наступило гораздо быстрее.
🐩 На западе Москвы началось тестирование патрульных робособак: они обходят территорию смарт-района СберСити и берут на себя функции обеспечения безопасности и общественного порядка.
🤖 Это мобильная платформа, которая оснащена динамиком для двусторонней с…
Как Москва и Питер превратились в "черные" дыры для страны?
Нужно увязать жилищное строительство и вопросы расселения с демографическими целями России. А значит - переходить от мегаполисов к равномерному расселению людей по стране.
Такой точкой зрения поделился президент Союза архитекторов России Николай Шумаков.
"Сегодня основная масса населения сосредоточена в Москве, Санкт-Петербурге и еще нескольких крупных го…
Строитель, который старше профессионального праздника!
Старейший депутат Госдумы Владимир Ресин в преддверии Дня строителя рассказал о диалоге бизнеса и власти, планах на будущее и болевых точках отрасли.
Наслаждайтесь!
2 300 магазинов в ТЦ закрылись. Страшно?
В Ассоциации торговой недвижимости и экспертов ритейла (АТЭР) успокоили – это не исчезновение торговых центров, а очередной этап их перестройки.
Сопредседатель АТЭР Павел Люлин пояснил, что покупатели продолжают ходить в ТЦ, но меняется структура их расходов.
Около 50-60% закрытий пришлось на магазины одежды. При этом более востребованы стали точки общепита, развлечений, сп…
Что в имени тебе моем?
Тема городского нейминга стала особенно актуальной после запрета иностранных названий и вывесок. Но на самом деле, она гораздо глубже и интереснее.
Неофициальные названия, присвоенные местам и зданиям самими горожанами - это важная часть городской культурной идентичности и социализации.
Как пояснил доцент факультета городского и регионального развития НИУ ВШЭ Кирилл Пузанов, это отражение жи…
Рекордный запас строек "на потом" сложился в России
На проекты жилья площадью почти 315 млн кв.м подготовлена градостроительная документация, но они не выведены на рынок.
Как сложился такой объем? Очевидно - заметную его часть составляют проекты, которые девелоперы откладывают на будущее – до лучших времен.
По оценкам экспертов, таким образом, формируется запас будущего предложения, который позволит девелоперам бы…
Нет мастер-плана = нет КРТ
Наличие мастер-плана должно стать обязательной частью решения о реализации проекта КРТ! С таким заявлением выступила главный архитектор Подмосковья Александра Кузьмина.
"Стадия подготовки проекта решения о КРТ дает уникальную возможность обеспечить формирование легенды развития территории. Поэтому предлагаем включить мастер-план как неотъемлемую и обязательную часть решения о КРТ для всех…
Заместитель Председателя Правительства Приморского края Ольга Иванникова
❤3👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @mastrenkov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 788,962 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Das ist Мастренкоff” (@mastrenkov), 364 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mastrenkov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
