Channel
@anatomiareputacii
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
233subscribers
+12 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003894023103 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @anatomiareputacii |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/anatomiareputacii |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 233 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:28 | 232 | +14 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 09:13 | 218 | +2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:37 | 216 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 221 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:32 | 221 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
39 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 30.8% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 28.2% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 20.5% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 12.8% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 2.56% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 2.56% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 2.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Режиссёр против электрика Свежий кейс. Случился накануне премьеры фильма «Последний богатырь. Колобок» (ради него в России перенесли «Человека-паука») Что было В комментариях к посту актера Журавлева о съемках электрик Владимир спросил: «Почему в трейлере так отвратительно нарисован Колобок?». И понеслось … Вернее, покатилось … Началось вроде вполне безобидно: режиссер Антон Маслов ответил, что трейлер и фильм — …
🤝1
Пламенный привет от отпускницы! ☀️ Даже отдыхая, думаю о вас 😛 Собрала для тех, у кого отдых впереди, подборку отпускных аватарок (честно каюсь,накопала в инсте — не могла мимо пройти милоты такой). Указать автора не могу, увы. Потому что взяла там, где тырено-перетырено #жиза #личное
🔥5❤3👍2😁1
Чем грешат А как говорят пиарщики 😎 Давайте честно: у нас, пиарщиков, есть свой язык. И свои клише 😄 На картинках мой топ: Далее идут «на самом деле», «все чаще», «по сути» )) А вы узнали свои любимые словечки? 😉 Хэштеги: #пиар #коммуникации #профессиональный_сленг #я_наблюдаю
❤6👍3🔥2
А у вас на работе есть коллеги, которые обожают замысловатые словечки? «Синергетическое лидерство», «парадигмы роста», «экосистема кросс-функциональных взаимодействий» — Корнельский университет утверждает: за этим прячется профессиональная пустота… Что выяснили ученые Когнитивный психолог Шейн Литтрелл опросил больше 1000 офисных работников и выяснил: те, кто ведется на корпоративный жаргон, хуже принимают решения…
👍2❤1💯1
Доброе утро! Давайте немного посплетничаем, чтобы начать пятницу с улыбки 😉 Холланд Холанду писал Том Холланд (это который человек-паук) пригласил на ужин футболиста Эрлинга Холанда. Написал ему в соцсетях. И — тишина… А потом выяснилось: спортсмен просто не знал, кто вообще это такой. Он не смотрит кино. Увидел сообщение от незнакомца и проигнорировал Сам Том отнесся к ситуации с юмором: «Это именно тот поучител…
😁4👍2🦄1
Cision — международная платформа для мониторинга СМИ и PR-аналитики (что-то вроде нашей «Медиалогии», только глобально)— каждый год опрашивает журналистов по всему миру и выпускает отчёт «State of the Media». В этот раз коллеги сделали чек-лист, что делать и не делать в письмах редакциям, опросив 1800+ журналистов. Тут коротко выжимка, а док приложила 1. Письмо, написанное ИИ, сразу летит в корзину. Ну, не любят СМ…
❤2👍2🔥1
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @anatomiareputacii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Анатомия репутации” (@anatomiareputacii), 233 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anatomiareputacii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.