Channel
@maslomvnis
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
744subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001380344246 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @maslomvnis |
| Created | 11 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/maslomvnis |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Sept 2026, 20:16 | 744 | -1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 01:40 | 745 | +1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 744 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:44 | 746 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 748 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 750 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 750 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 27 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
98 reactions across 6 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 55 | 56.1% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 14.3% | |
| custom 5370843439573247792 | 8 | 8.16% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 8.16% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 5.10% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 4.08% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 3.06% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.02% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 98 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Даешь деконструкцию! Дали. А дальше-то что? — А ничто. Над кучей ненужных деталей сидим в мирозданье пустом. Постылые эти бирюльки то так мы разложим, то сяк, и эхом неясным и гулким кромешный ответствует мрак. Не склеить уже эти штучки, и дрючки уже не собрать. И мы продолжаем докучно развинчивать и расщеплять. Кто делает вид, кто и вправду никак не поймет, дурачок, что шуточки эти не в радость и эта премудрость …
❤6🔥3😁3
В одном букинисте нашла неожиданное-приятное: каталог выставки японского современного искусства в СССР 1962 года. Это, конечно, скорее памятник эпохи, чем научный источник. Пока в Японии активно развивался авангард на обломках капитуляции, обвала всех авторитетов и кошмарного потрясения атомных бомбежек, в каталог включили только соц реализм, соответствующий советским вкусам и понятиям об искусстве. А в статье есть …
❤7custom 53708434395732477923
А вот ещё возможность нам увидеться: 25 июля в 15:00 в Библиотеке «В Озерках» рассказываю про дружбу Репина и Чуковского, про вегетарианские среды в «Пенатах» и рисунки окурками в альманахе «Чукоккала». Вход бесплатный, можно заранее зарегистрироваться здесь: https://vk.ru/topic-101045506_66930453 Все это удовольствие в честь выставки «Далекие — близкие» нашего музея, которая там же проходит. Кто у меня бывал — зна…
❤9🔥7💯4
Я совершенно не киноман. Ещё меньше шарю в японском кино. Но в один вечер мне захотелось чего-то эдакого, и я последовала принципу одного кинокритика в тиктоке — открыла японский топ100 на Letterboxed и запустила генератор случайных чисел. Так я открыла для себя абсолютный шедевр — «Бирманская арфа» 1956 года режиссера Итикава Кон. Конец Второй мировой. Японский отряд затерян в лесах Бирмы, они пытаются добраться д…
❤11❤🔥8🔥4
Сегодня все выгуливают свои хаори в БДТ на российско-японском фестивале! 🐱🤩 Программа крутая: пытаюсь определиться, хочу ли я смотреть дефиле кимоно или слушать лекцию про современный японский театр. Кто тоже здесь? Давайте встретимся!
❤12custom 53708434395732477925🥰1
Во время моего обучения в Академии был какой-то прикол вечно спрашивать у меня, искусствоведа — а вы наверное и сами рисуете? А я могу максимум в такое, как на картинке. Сейчас, к счастью, спрашивать перестали. То ли искусство испортилось изменилось, то ли к 32 непонятые творцы все-таки выглядят похуже, чем я со своим музейно-выствочным недосыпом. Фото с последней ярмарки PAF в севкабеле.
❤10👍3😁2
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @maslomvnis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Маслом вниз” (@maslomvnis), 744 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maslomvnis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.