Channel
@marusyatupit
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
142subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001219869413 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @marusyatupit |
| Created | 8 July 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/marusyatupit |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 142 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 141 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 141 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 10 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
60 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 27 | 45.0% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 13.3% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 13.3% | |
| 🤩 | 8 | 13.3% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 6.67% | |
| 🤨 | 2 | 3.33% | |
| 🤪 | 2 | 3.33% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2025 to 21 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
принесла домой страшно даже распечатывать сигареты и то выглядят безопаснее дома такое держать не понято как, в доме дети малые, но грамотные. нужен какой-то сейф. но пока его нет, вращая глазами для пущего устрашения, сообщила, что это не для детей, не брать, не трогать и, конечно, не читать. надеюсь, послушаются
😁2
воздух вокруг такой... такой напряженный, густой, гудящий, как будто май и скоро грохнет и сверкнет я всегда боялась грозы и только несколько раз не позволяла себе паниковать, когда рядом был кто-то слабее меня. а приближение всегда чувствовала раньше всех. потому что тревожинка. походу пересмотрела "мартовские иды". надо теперь жахнуть "день выборов". ну или "отчаянных домохозяек". для разрядки
❤2
так и живем бгг
подмосковные электрички в 6 утра (да и в люьое другое время) с обмороженными дверьми и покрытыми льдом вагонами выглядят очень даже постапокалиптично. два-три дня таких адских покатушек пережить можно, вроде даже мне удалось. как люди это годами выносят (это - катание по несколько часов ежедневно на работу и обратно с рандомными отменами, переносами и пр) мне понять не под силу. ябысдох
Интересную новость прочла я вчера в CNews. «Компания Apple заблокировала пользователю доступ ко всем своим сервисам после того, как он попытался активировать недействительную подарочную карту. Этот пользователь – сам Парис Баттфилд-Аддисон, автор кипы книг по разработке на языках Objective-C и Swift, на которых пишется софт для iOS. Без него не было бы столько программистов для iOS. Сам себя он называет "евангелистом…
🤨2🤪2
все елки одинаково украшены баранками поэтому у меня - золотые шары и никаких баранок маруся против трендов хехе
😁4
камчатские рыбы почти путеводитель есть еще видос по лососевым, в замедленном ютубчике https://youtu.be/JN7pYlUrFwc?si=M_XbGp7YG7KUGwRx
👍4🔥1
File, posted without a caption
❤1
и вот эта какая навязчивая ужс не слушайте просто адище на сутки
😱1
настроение такое - посмотри вокруг
❤2🔥1
#ословесности Не было у славистов занятия любимее, чем расшифровывать наше всё - главный памятник русской письменности «Слово о полку Игореве». Дело не только в том, что «Слово» было написано очень давно и язык с тех пор поменялся до неузнаваемости. Дело в том, что: а) оно было написано вообще без пробелов между словами, как тогда было принято; б) оригинал до нас не дошел, а дошел только «испорченный телефон», п…
🔥10
лучшее, что случилось на этих длинных выходных - шоу "ферма кларксона" от этого сельского часа невозможно оторваться. никакой детектив меня так не захватывал оценка зрителей на разных ресурсах от 9, то есть на уровне твин пикс, во все тяжкие, игры престолов, чернобыля. потрясающая работа, прекрасный джереми кларкс, огненная картинка, английский юмор - идеальное комбо
🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @marusyatupit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 680,331 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“маруся и тупыш” (@marusyatupit), 142 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marusyatupit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.