Channel
@marugaeva_ee
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
184subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002774228222 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @marugaeva_ee |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/marugaeva_ee |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 13:16 | 184 | -1 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 01:37 | 185 | +2 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 14:39 | 183 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 09:06 | 184 | -4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 188 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:05 | 187 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 187 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
171 reactions across 9 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 87 | 50.9% | |
| 🔥 | 34 | 19.9% | |
| 🎉 | 19 | 11.1% | |
| 😢 | 9 | 5.26% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 3.51% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 3.51% | |
| 💘 | 4 | 2.34% | |
| 🆒 | 2 | 1.17% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 1.17% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.585% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.585% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 171 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Почему психолог — это не тот человек, который знает, как Вам лучше? Быстрый ответ: потому что никто, кроме Вас, не знает, как лучше именно Вам. 🤩Как психолог я стараюсь делать процесс терапии максимально прозрачным: провожу психопросвещение, объясняю базовые механизмы когнитивно-поведенческой терапии и делюсь концептуализаций, а также подэтапами наших сессий. К чему идем, и что прошли. И, наверное, один из самых к…
❤3🔥2💘1😢1
Сегодня наконец-то дошел мой документ о повышении квалификации! ▫️ Официально освоенный подход КПТ! Всё еще собираюсь с силами записать длинную болталку в этот канал о моем 5 курсе. Недавно я задумалась, и пришла в ужас и одновременно восторг с того, сколько я на себя навесила на 1 год, и что всё в итоге успела! ▫️ Очень хочется поделиться тем периодом и тем, как я ощущаю это сейчас, летом, в постдипломном тильте …
❤13🎉4🔥3🤩1🆒1
Собрала (забрала) покемонов за 2025 😁
🔥9❤8🎉1😁1
Вот и завершился курс по КПТ 🎉 Сегодня прошла защита кейса, справились! И это только начало проф развития. Зато какое 👉 #путь@marugaeva_ee #лайф@marugaeva_ee
❤9🎉4💘1🔥1
Я дипломированный специалист! 👩🎓 Вчера я получила диплом о высшем психологическом образовании. Важная глава моей жизни завершена. Очень хочется поделиться ощущениями и впечатлениями, но пока нет сил и какой-то единой мысли… Но потом обязательно соберусь и что-нибудь расскажу))) Пока что, проживаем этот период и принимаем тревогу 🤩 #лайф@marugaeva_ee #путь@marugaeva_ee
❤14🔥6🎉5🤩2💘1
Недавно у меня под видео началось бурное обсуждение того факта, что эмоционального интеллекта не существует. На мой взгляд, даже если такого у нас нет, и это просто название способностей — не отменяет факта существования некого "интеллекта" которому просто дали название. Это просто термин. Тогда, а что такое мышление? Что такое интеллект? Это же все совокупность, которая объединяется одним названием. 🤩 Миллионы раб…
❤7🔥3💯2👀1💘1🤔1
Боль, которую несло целое поколение — одиночество. Сегодня случайно пересмотрела два мультфильма, на которых выросло и продолжает расти не одно поколение: Попугай Кеша и Домовенок Кузя. И в 22 года, впервые посмотрев это взрослой, я увидела страшное — от мультфильма к мультфильму раскрывается проблема детского одиночества… И это ужаснуло. 🎧 Если вспомните, то эта линия идет в каждом мультике О детях, где Взрослые —…
❤13😢6💯4🔥2🤔1
На прошлой неделе прошла защита ВКР. То, к чему идёшь все 5 лет обучения. Посмотрим же поэтапно, как это было 😁 1. Защита 2. Преддипломная практика 3. Процесс написания 4. Предзащита 5. Сдача печатной версии на кафедру 6. Оценки после защиты Даже не верится, что это был последний шаг в процессе обучения на специалитете... Осталось только получить сам диплом. Но дальше больше 💪🏻 #путь@marugaeva_ee #лайф@marugaeva_
❤10🔥5🤩3🎉2😢2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤10🎉3🔥3🆒1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @marugaeva_ee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Доказательно и без магии” (@marugaeva_ee), 184 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marugaeva_ee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.