Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

выхожу один я на дорогу

@martyrlamb

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

208subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002344080346
TypeChannel
Username@martyrlamb
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/martyrlamb

Growth

20811 Aug 2026, 19:46 — 208 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 07:03 — 208 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 19:4612 Aug 2026, 07:03
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 207–209 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 07:03208no change
11 Aug 2026, 19:46208first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 10 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
77.4%
avg views ÷ 208 subscribers
Avg views / post
161
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held10 (10 June 20261 August 2026)
Views total644
Reactions total112
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

305 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52201445433740032396521.3%
custom 54564988785954805755819.0%
custom 52515222687685315274916.1%
custom 52605415325864015494615.1%
custom 53057350940303243493611.8%
custom 5337117161636782557299.51%
custom 5192973197280038999227.21%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 305reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 10 we hold a reading for · 40%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @martyrlamb. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 June 2026 to 1 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC89 views28 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Шершни, но в лесу я и мои besties.

custom 545649887859548057512custom 52515222687685315279custom 53371171616367825577

29 Jul 2026, 12:08 UTC105 views15 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @swannynestPhoto

По сверхъестественному выйдут два комиксных спиноффа, где братья окажутся порознь и сюжет будет исследовать как долго, они смогут оставаться по отдельности. Выход 02.09.2026 Притворимся, что Крипке не исследовал эту тему 5 сезонов и словно на очередное сэмовское Дину "ты мне больше не брат", тот не валялся у него в ногах через месяц. Биба и Боба идут набором, если вы выкрутили одного тамогочи, то второй тоже скоро о

custom 53057350940303243496custom 54564988785954805755custom 53371171616367825573custom 52201445433740032391

24 Jul 2026, 09:31 UTC143 views30 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀Он окружен убогими призраками, а не людьми. Они терзают, как могут терзать только бессмысленные видения, дурные сны, отбросы бреда — и все то, что сходит у нас за жизнь. ⠀⠀⠀В теории, ему хотелось бы проснуться. Но проснуться не в силах без посторонней помощи, а этой помощи безумно боится, да и душа износилась, привыкла к своим тесным пеленам. ⠀⠀ 𝖙𝖆𝖌 { 🤩 🏎️ }: #georgerussell

custom 522014454337400323912custom 530573509403032434910custom 52515222687685315278

17 Jul 2026, 14:55 UTC307 views39 reactions3 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀Двоякость бытия, два неразлучных символа, пара противоположностей. Горе и радость, несчастье и счастье, черное и белое. Сирин представала райской птицей, чье пение на земле зачаровывало людей, но, даже разгоняя тоску и обещая блаженство, она оставалась опасным существом, способным погубить человека. Алконост — райская птица. Ее пение так же прекрасно и так же небезопасно, как пение Сирин. Оно считалось утеш

custom 545649887859548057517custom 522014454337400323912custom 526054153258640154910

11 Jul 2026, 11:55 UTC199 views29 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @georgerussellsprincessPhoto

"бык на ринге" I came crawlin' in on all fours Knockin' at your door Knockin' at your door I don't wanna bleed anymore I just wanted love But you wanted gore You're my matador #russtappen #f1 буду очень рада репосту

custom 522014454337400323913custom 52515222687685315278custom 52605415325864015498

5 Jul 2026, 17:02 UTC201 views48 reactions3 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀Королева наблюдала за ним с той холодной отстраненностью, с какой рассматривают любопытный, но бесполезный экспонат в местном музее. В то время как он, разгильдяй всея школы, чувствовал себя, будто его только что причислили к безликим статистам в ее личном спектакле, где главная звездная роль навсегда оставалась за ней. ⠀⠀ ⠀ 𝖙𝖆𝖌 { 🌟 📹 }: #reginageorge ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀ ⠀#rodrickheffley :: ⠀⠀

custom 519297319728003899922custom 545649887859548057515custom 525152226876853152710custom 53057350940303243491

22 Jun 2026, 13:04 UTC197 views30 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Актуально или нет ответьте...

custom 525152226876853152714custom 52605415325864015499custom 53371171616367825577

22 Jun 2026, 09:52 UTC232 views42 reactions2 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀С детства я занимался футболом, теннисом, плаванием, соревновался и выигрывал. Но когда в девять лет пришел на картинг, сердце забилось чаще, я просыпался рано утром и уже не мог уснуть в предвкушении момента, когда выйду на трассу. ⠀⠀⠀⠀Выходит, я влюбился. ⠀⠀ ⠀𝖙𝖆𝖌 { 💪🖤 }: #daniilkvyat ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀

custom 530573509403032434918custom 522014454337400323912custom 533711716163678255712

10 Jun 2026, 11:43 UTC227 views35 reactions3 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀ Я уже долго живу, я прожил сто шестьдесят два года, а ты только начала жить, а теперь ты хочешь, чтоб тебя убили? ⠀⠀... это не геройство, Елена, это трагедия. ⠀⠀𝖙𝖆𝖌 { 🩶🖤 }: #stefansalvatore ⠀⠀

custom 522014454337400323915custom 526054153258640154910custom 54564988785954805759custom 53057350940303243491

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @martyrlamb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 343,249 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“выхожу один я на дорогу” (@martyrlamb), 208 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/martyrlamb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.