Channel
@SongOfBlood
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
43subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002643345565 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SongOfBlood |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SongOfBlood |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:54 | 43 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:30 | 44 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 44 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 14 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
61 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5413499031827546552 | 32 | 52.5% | |
| custom 5413666758890388240 | 29 | 47.5% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 14 September 2025 to 13 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⠀⠀⠀⠀❞Его глаза, бледные и холодные, как утренний иней, скользили по толпе без всякого интереса, будто он рассматривал скот на рынке. В них не читалось ни восхищения роскошью Тиреллов, ни предвкушения турнирных потех. Лишь расчетливая, отстраненная оценка.❝ 🤩🤩🤩 #посты 🤩🤩🤩#русеболтон 🤩🤩🤩#aestheticsoftheweek💭 ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀💭ㅤrole-play 💭 ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
custom 54134990318275465526custom 54136667588903882406
🤩🤩 ❞ Улыбка на её лице вновь превратилась в привычный оскал холодный и острый, словно клинок. А глаза, казалось, заискрились злорадным светом. Серсея явно гордилась своими словами, наслаждаясь этим мгновением власти. Её золотистые волосы, сверкали на свету, а платье из тончайшего бархата подчеркивало стройность и грацию. ❝ 🤩🤩🤩 #посты 🤩🤩🤩#серсеяланнистер 🤩🤩🤩#aestheticsoftheweek💭 ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀💭ㅤrole-play 💭
custom 54134990318275465526custom 54136667588903882404
🤩🤩 ❞ Зрелищность больше не заботила её, оставшуюся один на один со вмиг опустевшим замком и его призраками. Призраками памяти, скорби и утраченного наследия. ❝ 🌟🌟#посты 🌟🌟#аллириядейн 🌟🌟#aestheticsoftheweek💭 ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀💭ㅤrole-play 💭
custom 54134990318275465526custom 54136667588903882405
⠀⠀⠀❞ Серсея не спешила говорить. Она наблюдала за Мирцеллой так, словно хотела прочесть в её взгляде зарождающуюся мысль, увидеть, какой урок вынесет дочь из случившегося. Где-то вдали раздавался звон стали и смех, напоминание о празднике, который шёл своим чередом, несмотря на мгновенно вспыхнувший и столь же быстро угасший шторм эмоций. Наконец она чуть приподняла подбородок, позволив губам тронуться едва заметной …
custom 541349903182754655210custom 54136667588903882409
🤩🤩 ❞ В свои юные годы леди Мирцелла только училась читать между строк. Ей было так далеко до ядовитой проницательности матери, а её мысли всё ещё были полны доброй, детской наивности и «глупостей», как с усмешкой называла их Серсея. ❝ 🤩🌟🌟 #посты 🤩🤩🤩#мирцеллабаратеон 🤩🤩🤩#aestheticsoftheweek💭 ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀💭ㅤrole-play 💭
custom 54136667588903882405custom 54134990318275465524
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @SongOfBlood. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,046,836 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐈𝐍𝐅𝐎 | 𝐒𝐎𝐍𝐆 𝐎𝐅 𝐁𝐋𝐎𝐎𝐃” (@SongOfBlood), 43 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SongOfBlood.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.