Channel
@marmarrries
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
83,441subscribers
+246 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001436585931 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @marmarrries |
| Description | сотрудничество: @dinatimer проголосовать: https://t.me/marmarrries?boost регистрация канала: https://clck.ru/3GXKvx по разбану: @PSlX0 по вопросам и предложениям: @marmariesbot сотрудничество: @dinatimer |
| Created | 24 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/marmarrries |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
89,800 average views per post against 83,441 subscribers — an engagement rate of 107.6%. Across the 7,904 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,623–99,961 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.93% and 21.0%, with a median of 10.4%.
| Window | 30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 19 of 19 published in the window (0 exact, 19 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 1,705,900 |
| Mature posts only | 118.0% over 17 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 83,441 measured 12 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b31623:rus · 7,904 channels · p10 2.39% · p25 4.93% · p50 10.4% · p75 21.0% · p90 37.1% |
| Position in cohort | 99.747th percentile · 10.4× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.062% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 83,441 | +43 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:49 | 83,398 | +20 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 83,378 | +7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 83,371 | +48 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:20 | 83,323 | +94 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 83,229 | +15 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:43 | 83,214 | +19 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 83,195 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (18 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,705,900 |
| Reactions total | 44,557 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
44,557 reactions across 19 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5364035680185894959 | 10,100 | 22.7% | |
| custom 5307532555023556119 | 4,100 | 9.20% | |
| custom 4909234858703717208 | 3,530 | 7.92% | |
| custom 5388708325976190525 | 2,640 | 5.92% | |
| custom 4906683235813033114 | 2,530 | 5.68% | |
| custom 5413329131511260984 | 2,310 | 5.18% | |
| custom 5253793653633070995 | 2,200 | 4.94% | |
| custom 5395338312372206254 | 2,070 | 4.65% | |
| custom 5231096843122779616 | 1,830 | 4.11% | |
| custom 5312507660455648638 | 1,780 | 3.99% | |
| custom 5426839324802974542 | 1,760 | 3.95% | |
| custom 5336865562452579278 | 1,750 | 3.93% | |
| custom 5388741736526787140 | 1,720 | 3.86% | |
| custom 5323309911226982377 | 1,570 | 3.52% | |
| custom 5242334234210742485 | 1,480 | 3.32% | |
| custom 5300893308678059921 | 1,440 | 3.23% | |
| custom 5339255565723903023 | 1,130 | 2.54% | |
| custom 5231089455779031491 | 617 | 1.38% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44,557reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @marmarrries. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
последний шанс угадать 🥰
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
custom 5231089455779031491617
угадайте почему мы плакали
custom 53008933086780599211,440
вчера мне исполнилось 25 лет.
custom 49092348587037172083,530
посвятите меня пожалуйста, что ещё нельзя со мной будет делать на родах. чтобы я знала не только про выдавливание ребенка, насильное введение катетера и капельницу.
custom 52423342342107424851,480
есть два типа людей
custom 52310968431227796161,830
почему эта информация до беременности попадалась мне ноль раз?
custom 53953383123722062542,070
последние пару дней оч тошнит, нет сил ни на что, но зато животик уже появился 🫦🤗
custom 53887083259761905252,640
хочу связать эту хайповую люльку 👶 кто знает, где они берут эти матрасики с краями и сборочками? и насколько эта люлька прочная, имеет ли смысл тратить время или лучше оставить эту идею кто-то мб вязал и вынес какие-то наблюдения, буду признательна, если поделитесь (или вообще где-то эти люльки продаются готовые просто) upd: большое спасибо за советы, а то бы связала за зря
custom 54268393248029745421,760
друзья, как некоторые знают, моя тётя помогает кошечкам. сейчас она борется за жизнь кошечки Глаши. приложить остальные фотографии тут не могу, т.к. они тяжелые для восприятия. можете полностью почитать этот пост, если хотите больше подробностей: https://vk.ru/wall-185553613_4920 кошечке нужен круглосуточный стационар, я уже закинула от себя и предлагаю вам тоже принять участие в спасении её маленькой жизни. помимо …
custom 53392555657239030231,130
кто разбирается, какие приколы от государства мне положены как будущей маме? мб подарки или пособия какие, помимо маткапитала за рождение. я как ИП же тоже могу в декретный отпуск уйти, по идее 🧐 ещё видела в рилсах, что в спб дают какую-то крутую коробку с подгонами для малыша. если кто знает, как это всё организовать, буду признательна, если поделитесь 🎁
custom 53125076604556486381,780
если что, нам сказали, что уже понятен пол, но мы пока что не слушали ждем гендер пати. на след неделе пойдем на второй скрининг, там уже прям супер-точно будет понятно. у меня уже некоторым близким снились сны, что пацан 😮 тч тоже можете предположить в комментариях, кто родится 😉🤰
custom 49066832358130331142,530
я надеюсь, что, когда бро родится, он будет смотреть со мной атаку и ловить плюс вайб потому что, как утверждают эксперты из рилс, он как-то запомнил, что слушал опенинги еще в утробе 🌟
custom 54133291315112609842,310
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @marmarrries. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
последний шанс угадать 🥰
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 929,704 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
2 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“маша мармарис печатает..” (@marmarrries), 83,441 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marmarrries.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.