Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
158,000 average views per post against 106,138 subscribers — an engagement rate of 148.6%. Across the 2,340 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,022–316,171 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.39% and 20.6%, with a median of 9.80%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured
13 of 13 published in the window (0 exact, 13 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
2,049,700
Mature posts only
157.2% over 12 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 95 days, net +23,139. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 79,718–109,855 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 15:07
106,334
-44
8 Nov 2026, 09:34
106,378
+14
7 Nov 2026, 04:46
106,364
+145
6 Nov 2026, 05:19
106,219
+81
5 Nov 2026, 05:50
106,138
+18
4 Nov 2026, 05:56
106,120
+116
3 Nov 2026, 06:47
106,004
+154
2 Nov 2026, 06:28
105,850
+54
1 Nov 2026, 08:46
105,796
+136
31 Oct 2026, 09:15
105,660
+258
30 Oct 2026, 11:59
105,402
-91
29 Oct 2026, 15:21
105,493
-156
28 Oct 2026, 12:26
105,649
+3
27 Oct 2026, 14:50
105,646
+22
26 Oct 2026, 16:19
105,624
+124
25 Oct 2026, 12:46
105,500
+106
24 Oct 2026, 11:46
105,394
+155
23 Oct 2026, 10:20
105,239
+259
22 Oct 2026, 09:17
104,980
+288
21 Oct 2026, 04:16
104,692
first reading
Engagement
65 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 196 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
156.9%
avg views ÷ 106,334 subscribers
Avg views / post
167,000
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.66%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 65 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
65 (18 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
2,669,300
Reactions total
44,342
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 05:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,720
Videos
≈490
Links
≈251
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
15s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
201,871 reactions across 65 posts, in 61 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 7.23% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5247152805264764626
14,600
7.23%
custom 5364035680185894959
12,970
6.42%
custom 5400289189893780856
8,500
4.21%
custom 5226622994733866956
7,220
3.58%
custom 5253481529769734511
6,950
3.44%
custom 5226748837275641387
6,390
3.17%
custom 5404774510140345659
6,160
3.05%
custom 4906683235813033114
5,610
2.78%
custom 5303327674666609766
5,020
2.49%
custom 5226838537667617343
4,970
2.46%
custom 5300893308678059921
4,720
2.34%
custom 4909234858703717208
4,590
2.27%
custom 5188533330672383158
4,170
2.07%
custom 5307532555023556119
4,100
2.03%
custom 5201745564902891277
3,790
1.88%
custom 5192857499451021759
3,720
1.84%
custom 5424876833986355714
3,620
1.79%
custom 5323309911226982377
3,600
1.78%
custom 5230950547946745533
3,590
1.78%
custom 5427007953808932136
3,280
1.62%
41 further kinds
84,301
41.8%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 65 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 201,871 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
910
across the posts below
Posts paid on
60
of 65 we hold a reading for · 92%
Most on one post
121
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @marmarrries. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 65 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 16 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
если кто знает прикольные детские бренды, можете пожалуйста посоветовать их под этим постом. с фотками и названиями, что конкретно в ассортименте прикольного
(бутылочки, одежда, игрушки, пеленки, декор и прочие детские штуки и свои полезные находки)
под прошлым постом много хороших советов относительно матрасиков. я уверена, вам известна куча прикольных вещей.
заранее огромное спасибо 🥰
я никогда не трогала младенцев. никогда не держала малыша на руках, не видела новорожденного. впервые я увидела маленького ребенка вблизи этим летом, в 25 лет, когда к нам во двор вышел тренер Юлика с семьей.
очень предвкушаю роды. жду, когда родится Нина и я испытаю все эти ранее незнакомые чувства 🫡
в итоге описала это состояние двум врачам. оказалось, то была не изжога.
схватывало живот, жгло внутри и отпускало. длилось на протяжении 2-4 часов, точно не помню уже. изжога это что-то другое, как выяснилось. её у меня никогда не было и нет.
к чему я это.
слух о том, что волосы на голове у ребенка вызывают изжогу - лишь слух.
были вчера на скрининге, видели у Нины шевелюру уже, а изжоги за беременность у меня не …
на днях пойдем на финальный скрининг и также заглянем в роддом, в котором оплачены роды.
составила список покупок по советам из под старого поста, чтобы проконсультироваться со врачом по этому поводу.
пока что, если кто разбирается, можете раскритиковать этот список: дополнить или ужать. буду признательна ☺️
дорогие мамы, к вам вопросы личного характера 🥲
как вы начали рожать? при каких обстоятельствах это произошло? как добирались до роддома? сколько часов длились роды? были ли разрывы и (уж совсем личное) как произошел первый поход в туалет?
безумно интересно почитать ваш индивидуальный опыт, буду признательна, если решите поделиться 🥰
отзыв на третий триместр.
- девятый месяц. 34ая эмбриональная/36ая акушерская неделя.
за последние 2-3 недели живот уже значительно вырос.
раньше казалось, что тяжело дышать - то были цветочки. вот теперь действительно тяжело дышать.
• сплю плохо. просыпаюсь ночами, чтобы перевернуться на другой бок. переворот на другой бок теперь испытание 🫡
• матка давит на мочевой пузырь. постоянно кажется, что хочется в туалет…
Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @marmarrries. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @marmarrries as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
14 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
14 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
30 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
векши @vekshy08 · 31,097 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 13 September 2026
небога от бога @neboga_ot_boga · 96,993 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 15 August 2026
ул.Графская️👑 @graphdg · 110,270 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 14 August 2026
Лисса Авеми @LissaAveme · 90,658 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 16 August 2026
гот стиль бля @gothstyle_blya · 165,358 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 15 September 2026
PETROVA @milanapetrovaqueen · 197,670 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 11 August 2026
лиззка @cringeahoy · 33,856 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 15 September 2026
Любимый ВПШ 😮💨 @lyubimyivpsh · 142,012 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 13 August 2026
Юлик @juliusspeak · 108,410 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 14 August 2026
Приятный Ильдар @unpleasent · 483,679 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 14 August 2026
Clapp Snap! @KateClappTelegram · 170,871 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 12 August 2026
Elmofeo Life @elmofeo_life · 25,335 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 14 September 2026
НЕКИЙ КАНАЛ🎬 @kanalnekiy · 178,551 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 12 August 2026
KOSTI @kosti · 550,990 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 8 August 2026
дед инсайд блонд @deadblonde · 156,489 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 12 August 2026
маркус тут @markkalinin · 29,100 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 15 September 2026
♻️ Femmo ♻️ @egorafullhd · 240 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 13 September 2026
EkaterinaKoreaTG @ekaterinakoreatg · 111,878 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 14 August 2026
КК @petrovtel · 541,590 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 9 August 2026
Это Лиза @etolizochka · 115,158 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
2 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“маша мармарис печатает..” (@marmarrries), 106,334 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marmarrries.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
