Posted without readable text

Channel
💬 Маркировочная / digital с юристом
@markirovochnaya
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
755subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001930349169 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @markirovochnaya |
| Description | Собираем правовые новости цифрового мира — рассказываем, как законно работать в digital Сотрудничество: @olgakoptseva Бесплатная консультация в чате @markiruy со Светланой Кузевановой @svetlana_kuzevanova Канал ведёт PR-агентство @mediacom_pr PR в СМИ |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/markirovochnaya |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:00 | 755 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 755 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 25 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 16.4%
- avg views ÷ 755 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 124
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.35%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (25 March 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 495 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 02:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 251
- Videos
- 12
- Links
- 218
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1m 25s
- Average length
- 1m 25s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
38 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 14 | 36.8% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 15.8% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 13.2% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 10.5% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 7.89% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 7.89% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 2.63% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.63% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 2.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Телеграм-канал Код Дурова изменил название Основателя Telegram Павла Дурова* внесли в список экстремистов и террористов Росфинмониторинга
Степени риска: как дело Дурова может отразиться на пользователях Telegram Уголовное дело против Павла Дурова встревожило клиентов Telegram: депутаты уже не исключают признания мессенджера террористической организацией и предостерегают от оформления платных подписок. Что все это значит для обычных пользователей — в колонке для Forbes объясняет медиаюрист Светлана Кузеванова. Пока юридических рисков нет, успокаивает …
ИИ всё чаще стал сомневаться, не нарушает ли запрос "правила использования контента", имея ввиду авторские права С 1 сентября 2026 года в России вступает в силу первый закон, регулирующий использование искусственного интеллекта: ФЗ «О поддержке развития технологий искусственного интеллекта в РФ» Про регулировании работы ИИ и маркировку контента, созданную с использованием нейросетей размышляет медиаюрист Светлана К…
👍2🤔2
🤡 «А сами-то?» Midjourney обвинила засудивший её за авторские права Голливуд в лицемерии — ИИ-компания утверждает, что Disney, Universal и Warner Bros. сами нарушают чужие авторские права с помощью ИИ. Подробнее за что судятся по ссылке: ↖️ https://kod.ru/midjourney-hollywood-ai-discovery
🗂 Маркетплейсы в ответе за тех, кого размещают Конституционный суд уточнил границы ответственности маркетплейсов за подделки. Платформы не обязаны заранее отслеживать нарушения прав продавцами, но после получения обоснованной претензии от правообладателя должны проверить доводы и принять меры. Если площадка проигнорирует доказательства и не ограничит продажу контрафакта — понесет ответственность наряду с продавцом.…
👍4😎1
Автор: @andreyzaitsevt 💻 Маркировочная — рассказываем о правовых аспектах работы в digital
👍1🔥1
👑 Разыграем 3 билета для наших любимых подписчиков на «Неделю Российского Ритейла» в Москве (22-25 июня) На форуме соберутся руководители всех крупных торговых сетей, маркетплейсов, агрегаторов доставки, ИТ-компаний, сервисных организациц, девелоперов, логистических операторов, представителей банковского сектора В прошлом году мы модерировали сессию про e-commerce: «Маркетплейсы – новые соцсети» с Wildberries&Russ…
Разыгрываем 3 билета на «Неделю Российского Ритейла» в Москве 22-25 июня 🔜 👍 mediacom_pr
Совсем скоро встретимся в Экспертном клубе НРФ, чтобы обсудить вызовы и проблемы, с которыми агентства и маркетинговые команды столкнулись в 2026-м. Попытаемся понять как адаптироваться и безопасно жить дальше. Поговорим про актуальное: использование русского языка и реклама. 📌 Вебинар «Новые правила игры: что важно знать брендам и агентствам в 2026 году» 📍11 июня в 16:00 Мероприятие бесплатное, но нужна регистра…
Сегодня День фрилансера. С праздником, свободные 🤣 👍 Mediacom_pr | VK
Threads — вы там?
- Да, веду личный блог14%
- Активно раскручиваю проект3%
- Почитываю, кто что пишет32%
- Активно комменчу8%
- Тредс. А что это?48%
- Я там живу и работаю2%
- Планирую завести10%
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @markirovochnaya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Threads — вы там?
- Да, веду личный блог14%
- Активно раскручиваю проект3%
- Почитываю, кто что пишет32%
- Активно комменчу8%
- Тредс. А что это?48%
- Я там живу и работаю2%
- Планирую завести10%
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2026 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💬 Маркировочная / digital с юристом” (@markirovochnaya), 755 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/markirovochnaya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.